Right wing extremism vs Islamic terror

>>136566141
trying to find the facts, i remember seeing some fbi crime stats page or something that totally btfo'd that argument but cant find it, halp

>>136566141
Depends where you live, in the UK its defo muslims

>>136566408
yeah there has to be a counter argument, like the population of right wing extremists vs Muslim extremists or something though. i dunno i just think its a weak jew argument to use and there has to be facts out there that prove it wrong, honestly swear i saw a topic on /pol/ about this not too long ago and someone had dropped some good red pill that i didnt save

That person is correct.

right wingers wont bother you if you dont bother them
not sure how thats been working out with muslims

>>136566805
Didnt see the thread sadly, but i would say its just an average increase in the population. I wouldnt really say one group is more violent than the other in any regard, they are both following a twisted version of an idea (although one of them doesnt belong in the west anyway cough cough)

Yeah, the argument goes like "There have been more victims of right-wing terrorist attacks since 9/12 than Muslim-" and you stop listening there because they're retarded. Also they don't count the guy that shot up the fag bar last year. Look at the stats they're using, they BTFO themselves.

>>136566141
Any time you see that being pushed in the UK dig a little and behind it all is an ugly little affirmative action Paki. As is the case with that retarded web game they put up recently.

>>136567104
Are you kidding? Right wing politics is all about getting in other people's business.

>>136567104
censorship will definitely not work out well though.
you stop giving these people a voice on the internet and they will have no choice but to meet in person. wait wtf, i love google now.

>>136566141
Not per capita, no.

People will try and mislead you and say there is more right wing violence than Islamic when your country only has a few percent Muslims.

Plus, "right wing" violence in secondary and reactionary to Islamic violence. It wouldn't exist without Islam. It's a false equivalency.

Find the stats of white right wingers that move to an Islamic country and start blowing things up. There are none.

>>136566141
Not in America it isn't.

>>136567328
my point is from my experience, people like me only recently developed a political opinion. we have to see all this liberal bs on our tvs and video games. we can't even escape it in our homes. now youtube censorship.. if everyone deserves a vioce, then doesnt EVERYONE deserve a voice? claiming only a minority of people are far or alt right doesnt mean they dont deserve to be heard. in fact by liberal logic, we should be pitied and helped

>>136567449
lol yes it fucking would. That's the thing about the far-right, there needs to be a target for it to exist, so there's always a target one way or another.

>>136567574
You misunderstood me. The far right is very interested in getting into the business of people's religion, sexual relationships, friendships, career etc... It restricts everything.

>>136566141
It's a talking point for lefties because they don't want the (white) right wing to take power. They want it perpetually squashed and harmless, and they want everybody to hate on it. They know that if people started realizing the truth how deadly it would get for them. So they tell you to ignore Islamic attacks and treat it like an every day accident like a car crash, it can't be helped, just go on with your life. Because even though Islam calls for the destruction of Western civilization, and kills and rapes people in the streets, it doesn't matter because they're a brown people and not white, so they can do no wrong. Your real enemy is 60 iq rednecks and neonazis.

>>136567685
>You misunderstood me. The far right is very interested in getting into the business of people's religion, sexual relationships, friendships, career etc... It restricts everything.
What is libertarianism? Also this sounds more like the left wing desu, but that's politics for you.

>>136566141

Ofc the far right killed 6000000 jews.

File: 1498754478002.jpg (58KB, 528x498px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 528x498px

>>136567818
9999999999999999999999999 Jews*
Never forget goiym

>>136567685
only when it comes to our country. i truly believe a people has a right to protect its sovereign borders if it chooses to. i also do not think equality, when 13% of our population commits 40% of the crime and uses 40% of foodstamps and welfare (roughly). or how any organization of white people is deemed inherently racist , see BLM and others. not on the SPLC hatelist. our countries changing demographics change the direction of our country, we are being forced to develop political views. doesnt matter if you dont see it yet, you most likely will one day, or your children will.

>>136567734
Libertarianism, if we're talking about the usual right wing economic term, is just abstract authoritarianism. Usually in the form of having 2 awful choices and people justifying it to you with 'but you chose it'.

You can say what you want about the left wing, but they're very concerned with personal social freedom.

Of course it's true, because if they kill people they're not real muslims.
Excuse me, it's my turn to get raped by our refugee boarders and it's rude to keep them waiting.

>>136567611
Islamic violence and war has occurred for over 1000 years.

Please inform me about all the right wing skinheads in Victorian England.

Pretty much all of Western civilization up until about 40 years ago would be considered "right-wing"

File: 1495755982813.jpg (1MB, 1176x2360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1176x2360px

>>136566141
you tell me

in the sixties, the left was considered politically incorrect...

guys for real tho, read up on the different forms of islamic jihad, and the moaist warfare guide. its literally what islam is doing to the west.. they knew they couldnt beat us with weapons, so they do this instead. we have to wake up before its too late.

>>136567328
how the fuck do you figure that?

>>136566141
Depends what country you look at, but broadly speaking, no, it's a damn lie. They're usually quoting the number starting from 9/12/01, which pretty conveniently leaves out certain events. And even then, it's probably not true for Europe.

>>136566141
White Rage

The black rage is their defense.

Now when the young guy in Charleston did his shootings, they instantly convicted me which gave us lots of publicity.

The guy who just did the Jewish Center killings has just been convicted. At the beginning of his closing argument he put up on the whiteboard that “Diversity is a code word for White Genocide”.

But oddly enough, nobody came after me.

One explanation for this is, the same reason they put it off with CNN, they can’t deal with me.

But all this has made me consider White Rage.

If a black man runs around killing white people, it’s because of oppression.

Now if we have white guys out killing, In The Name Of White Genocide, it may be a warning.

Isolated Black killings of whites are the result of a legitimate “Black Rage”.

So isolated killings In The Name Of Genocide, may mean that instead stopping all discussion of White Genocide, the White Rage may indicate that’s exactly what we need to discuss. Or are we going to just have people keep picking up guns?

At the moment we’ve had very isolated incidents, two of them, but should we not consider White Rage?

There is no excuse for anybody just shooting other people, on a basis like this, but it may signify that we are going to have to discuss the real issue. And that does not mean with in the current bounds.

So maybe we should start looking at these isolated two killings as White Rage.

And a warning.

>>136567685
OK then, if the far right that everyone is so scared of today is comprised of evangelical Christians and not patriots and libertarians, why are Trump supporters considered far right? Or do you consider us moderates?

>>136567818
that was socialists

>>136566141

No.
Not even if you're Antifa(ggot).

>>136568339
It's the left sticking their nose in peoples business. From teaching kids gender shit, from stopping free speech, from ruining peoples career over their opinions.

You are trying to debate with an obvious commie.

>>136566141
Only if you include radical muslims as right wing extremists. Not even joking.

>>136567950
which is why they're banning Milo's book
banning Lauren from Patreon
shilling hard on /pol/
canceling speeches in universities
threatening British posters with arrest
and on and on

File: IMG_6801.jpg (337KB, 750x1750px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 750x1750px

>>136566141
Yes goy right wingers are more prone to terrorism.
DONT LOOK AT STATISTICS GOY THOSE ARE RACIST

>>136566141
'Right wing extremists' want to prevent you from being attacked by Islamist extremists and any other sort of attack from foreign nations/bodies. Just remember that.

islamic terrorists are right wing extremists

>>136566141
muslims are a right wing extremist group

>>136568563
my nigga

>>136567950
>You can say what you want about the left wing, but they're very concerned with personal social freedom.
Kek. More involuntary requisition is somehow good for personal social freedom? If I can't control how my money is spent, what freedom do I have? What say do I have in anything?

Poland, you can't be this retarded. And "Libertarianism is just abstract authoritarianism"? I know the education system is Poland is shit but at least research the terms you're using.

>>136568005
He's a shill. The reason Europe isn't a Caliphate is because of Poland. He's probably using a proxy.

>>136568820
/thread

Depends how you quantify right-wing terror. Sometimes they count things like retaliatory killings of trannies or vigilanteism as right-wing terrorism.

File: fear(1).jpg (736KB, 1920x1177px) Image search: [Google]

736KB, 1920x1177px

>>136566141
FEAR is the leash that tethers the gormless goyim.

>>136566141
lol no