Climate Change Debunked

File: 1484904765335.png (305KB, 1200x709px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1200x709px

Articles about climate change data manipulation:
>https://www.carbonbrief.org/major-correction-to-satellite-data-shows-140-faster-warming-since-1998
http://archive.is/yK0X4
>http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/31/australia-weather-bureau-caught-tampering-with-climate-numbers/
http://archive.is/3wDvy
>https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-tampering-at-ushcngiss/
http://archive.is/2ooBC
Peer-reviewed study on climate change data manipulation:
>http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments-account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=thedcenergy
http://archive.is/j7Zlg

Climate Change: In their own words
(Article pulling quotes from what politicans and activists have actually said about the science at IPCC):
>http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/02/05/in-their-own-words-climate-alarmists-debunk-their-science/#6c1bd2ea76fb
http://archive.is/rJtZb

97 articles refuting the 97% consensus (including 3 scientific journals):
>http://climatechangedispatch.com/97-articles-refuting-the-97-percent-consensus.html/
http://archive.is/8l7DZ

General information for those interested on climate models
"CLIMATE MODELS for the layman":
>http://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2017/02/Curry-2017.pdf
http://archive.is/GkJ8T
Author:
>Professor Judith A. Curry is the author of over 180 scientific papers on weather and climate and is a recipient of the Henry G. Houghton Research Award from the American Meteorological Society in 1992. She recently retired from the Georgia Institute of Technology, where she held the positions of Professor and Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. She is currently President of Climate Forecast Applications Network.

Her resignation letter to the university (CC related, extremely good read):
>https://judithcurry.com/2017/01/03/jc-in-transition/#more-22651
http://archive.is/KMlMV

File: 1502161921242.png (415KB, 907x587px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 907x587px

From Climate Change in their own words:
>Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S undersecretary of state for global issues, addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the U.N. Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.)

>Also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick, who then headed the policy divisions of the U.S. State Department said: “A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.”

>In 1988, former Canadian Minister of the Environment, told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

>In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

>Speaking at the 2000 U.N. Conference on Climate Change in the Hague, former President Jacques Chirac of France explained why the IPCC’s climate initiative supported a key Western European Kyoto Protocol objective: “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.”

>>136565683
>implying images made on and for a Lithuanian alpaca-breeding forum are with as much or more than data gathered and parsed by thousands and thousands of researchers that have done this for a decade or more, who coincidentally are all in on a giant conspiracy to make solar panel companies as rich as oil companies

File: pages-climate-graph-1.jpg (22KB, 616x266px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 616x266px

for anyone who is serious about this:

this is how the decadal temperature trend of the last 2 centuries actually looks

>>136566538
>He thinks oil companies are against climate change
http://notrickszone.com/2015/02/09/long-list-of-warmist-organizations-scientists-haul-in-huge-money-from-big-oil-and-heavy-industry/#sthash.lwbTb1Hd.gmi5op41.dpbs

If you truly believe global warming is a giant conspiracy you should see a shrink. And I mean it, faggot.

>>136566645
post a source Achmed

>>136566741
Why don't you try refuting what I've posted, instead?

>>136566741
It's not some big planned conspiracy, it's just a lot of different groups who will benefit pushing it, like most everything else, faggot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdm9dWK-khE

>>136566725
Guess that invalidates anything I've said and automatically proves anything you said. You sure are a great researcher.

>>136566811
PAGES2K Consortium multiproxy database
https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201788
http://pastglobalchanges.org/ini/wg/2k-network/data
https://idw-online.de/de/news678039

>>136566811
>Why don't you try refuting what I've posted, instead?
>Keep addressing my infinite unscientific and inane reasons for why all of your research is a lie, don't worry I'll find more images before you can finish your well though out post

>>136565683

They first need to be taught the concept of conflict of interest of these so called scientists and promoters. They need to understand that in order to find out the truth they need to follow the money.

>>136567205
It's not about the images you short sighted faggot, I posted tons of links including peer-reviewed studies

File: fail.jpg (79KB, 1104x451px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1104x451px

>>136567142
>http://pastglobalchanges.org/ini/wg/2k-network/data
your second link literally doesn't work

>>136567241
this
also expose the complete silence of the scientific community when politics is using their research to push shit that isn't about climate change at all, the recent paris climate accord is a fantastic example of this

File: 2ac.jpg (47KB, 496x791px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 496x791px

>>136565683
Are these graphs bamboozling me or does it seem that human activity/progress excels during the hot periods?
Also I wish we could see the more detailed temperature fluctuations within past millenia. I'm sure it had plenty of ups and downs back then as well

>>136567387
just put it into google...

File: fail2.jpg (122KB, 1028x621px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1028x621px

>>136567142
>https://idw-online.de/de/news678039
What the fuck are you trying to send me here Hans? This is from the source for your third link

>>136567262
>8=tons
You're not genuinely this retarded are you? You're just trolling, right?

>>136567528
so I guess it's my fault?
the doi reference leads you to my first link (which is the most important one), which is easily discernible as the titel is given right above it

do you want me to hold your hand as well?

File: 1473044397607.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

>>136567774
>you went back up and read how many literal links there were to prove some miniscule idiotic point instead of addressing them

lole.

>>136566645
Hans enlighten me here, it's me or that graph is dealing within a .6 degree celcius range on the y axis?

>>136568336
it is

>>136568442
So it's an extremely zoomed in version of the last 2,000 years is what you're telling me, is this correct?

>>136568602
what do you mean with 'zoomed in'?

>>136568660
What i mean is, if you zoomed out to say 1 or 2 degrees, the change would look much less dramatic, as well as if you put it on a larger timetable

File: clip_image002_thumb.png (155KB, 602x329px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 602x329px

>>136568776

File: volstok.jpg (82KB, 545x380px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 545x380px

>>136568776
fuck wrong one

>>136568776
sure but that's the case for literally any temperature trend over a few centuries
and since OP posted 2 pictures specifically concerning the last 2 millennia, I really don't see the point of that

>>136568906
Context is everything

>>136568969
changing the subject when you're shown to be wrong isn't an honest way of arguing

>>136569120
See
>>136565709
>>136568893

File: aaas_50million_2020.png (29KB, 581x302px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 581x302px

>>136565683

The goal is to make it seem as though white and Asian people caused global warming and now we are all responsible for all of the environmental immigrants from the third world.

The refugee crisis actually was purposely created through the collapse of the Gaddafi regime as a way of testing the waters.

>>136569120
And i didn't change the subject, i pointed out the limited scale of that graph which made it out of context

>>136565683
>forced globalism
You need to tie in the UN Agenda 21 & Agenda 2030 with this CC crap. (((They))) literally want to dramatically drop the population of the earth (the whites, not the dindus) and force everyone into the city centers (so they can control every aspect of our lives) all in the name of muh environment.

Scary, scary stuff when you start realizing all the zoning / planning regulations being enforced by our local cities & counties were all set up by the UN to take away our freedoms & rights... they are making it harder & harder to own land in the country & be self sustaining. They want us all the live downtown in tiny apartments, take the city bus or walk, be totally dependent on the government for everything we do.

>>136569564
>Scary, scary stuff

It seriously is, I cannot believe how indoctrinated people are, even on this site. I don't think people realize how big of a scam this climate change thing really is and what it entails.

File: All_palaeotemps.png (76KB, 1000x291px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1000x291px

>>136569389
so what stops us from playing the same game with this >>136568893 graphic?
the Pleistocene glacial cycle is also rather constrained when compared to the temperature swings of the Cenozoic.
And the Cenozoic temperature swings have to be placed in the context of the entire Phanerozoic, which then has to be viewed in light of Proterozoic glaciations and hothouse conditions and so on.

It's nothing but a rethorical trick to derail the conversation and divert attention away from the fact that completely false information is being handed out in this thread

>>136570009
Because the graph you linked to from OP is 12 degree, the one you posted is .6 degree. That's a huge difference.

I don't think the information is false, and the quotes from the IPCC certainly aren't false.

It's like your taking the graph you just posted, zooming in to the last 200 years, then zooming into a .6 degree celsius range and saying is catastrophic and man made

>>136570009
>>136570623
2,000*

>>136570000
when you get bored later today, look up ICLEI :/

>>136570623
yes of course,
anytime someone points out that warming of another degree Celsius (which is almost unavoidable at this point) brings us into the temperature range of MIS 5e, when sea level was 6 to 9 meters higher, and warming of another degree on top of that brings us into the Mid-Pliocene warm period, when sea level was 20+ meters higher, there will always be bloody fools who think that the Cambrian having much higher temperatures than now makes the problem go away

>>136570000
have you followed any of Randall Carlsons stuff?
He's written and talked about how the mainstream climate change science is bullshit.

http://sacredgeometryinternational.com/redemption-beast-carbon-cycle-demonization-co2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIRz2tv6nk

>>136571569
Will do, I already have it open

>>136572545
Not a whole lot, desu I just know what I've heard from him on JRE

Will watch

>>136565683
Say that to this fucking Lucifer hovering over our country.
I literally see dead insects and house geckos dead on the roads due to the fucking heat.

File: proxy-based_temperature_reconstruction.png (19KB, 720x237px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 720x237px

>>136565683
Sourse, Nasa

Nir Shaviv. Youtube.

Btfo globalust faggots.

>>136572545
>Go to presentation 5 slide number 163
Randall is the man. Guy knows so much about this. Wish he would debate Bill Nye on the subject and just eviscerate him.

>>136573563
Nasa is a shit source you flamer

File: GlobalWarmingBook.png (114KB, 231x317px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 231x317px

Big book coming out. Watch out Al-Gore!