The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond

>>136565191
nice
i bet more than half of the people virtue signaling about how bad it was didn't even read it.

>>136565191
WHAT THE FUCK
I THOUGHT THE UNIVERSITIES WERE ALL GOOD LITTLE GOYIM
WHO THE FUCK ARE THESE FOUR SCHEMDRICKS
THEY MUST BE TAUGHT A LESSON

File: shitlord.png (164KB, 427x640px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 427x640px

>(Even Google’s new ‘VP of Diversity’, Danielle Brown, criticized the memo because it ‘advanced incorrect assumptions about gender’; I was impressed to see that her Michigan State B.A. in Business and her U. Michigan M.B.A. qualify her to judge the scientific research.)
kek, it was pic related who said that

File: 1502185570211.png (30KB, 1028x569px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 1028x569px

>>136565191
DraftYourPrivacy#

>>136566849
Fucking savage.

Also thread deserves a bump, someone might actually learn how to (de)construct and argument rather than
>REEEE muh white male persecution

Bump for keks

File: 149795448406.gif (150KB, 245x320px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 245x320px

bump of salt mining

Bump for kek mining.

>Weirdly, the same people who advocate for equality of outcome in every aspect of corporate life, also tend to advocate for diversity in every aspect of corporate life. They don’t even see the fundamentally irreconcilable assumptions behind this ‘equality and diversity’ dogma.

>>136565191
Bump in the name of Lord Almighty Google.

funny how three of the four appear to be white males, and schmidt is presumably ftm jew

>>136571941
The Asian woman at the end didn't get half the real estate of the men

RAGEEEEEEEEEEEE, or maybe she just chose not to write as much

File: OhComeOn.gif (1011KB, 200x217px) Image search: [Google]

1011KB, 200x217px

>>136565191
These are the 4 "scientists" ... lol

Professor Lee Jussim
Lee Jussim is a professor of social psychology

Professor David P Schmitt
Since earning his bachelor’s degree and Ph.D. in personality psychology from the University of Michigan.

Associate Professor Geoffrey Miller
Geoffrey Miller is an evolutionary psychology professor at University of New Mexico.

Debra W Soh is a Toronto based science writer who has a PhD in sexual neuroscience from the University of York.

LOOOOL

>>136574276

Daily reminder that "psychology" isn't real and invented by Jews to destroy Western civilization.

File: 16kc2z.jpg (62KB, 620x372px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 620x372px

>>136574276
And where did you get your PhD, Jean-Pierre?

>>136574322
saved

>>136574398
thats funny because all four seem to be supporting the stance of the author

>>136574276
Anon, read what they say, don't judge people based off your preconceptions. Debate with their statements and their evidence.

>>136571219
yea I hadn't thought about that before. I guess it's a good argument to separate the claims that "gender diversity is good and should be encouraged" from "we need 50% of gender representation, otherwise there is inherent bias".

>>136574276
>evolutionary psychology
>sexual neuroscience

both are real sciences mate

>>136574322
nice

File: 1500036472420.png (284KB, 497x512px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 497x512px

>>136565191
>The STEM folks are now showing their power level

HOLY FUCK THIS TIMELINE MAN

>>136576112
It's about fucking time. These dudes basically run our society, writing our software, building are buildings, eventually they have to get tired of working against their own interests right?

File: ChtuyP0VEAQZlY1.jpg (89KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 600x800px

>>136576374
I mean, it makes sense. They're smart enough overall, why not smart enough to know when not to say things that just fuck you life up?

File: thats how its done.jpg (19KB, 297x170px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 297x170px

>>136566849
OUTSTANDING

>>136576555
Dunning-Krueger effect.

>four scientists respond
Did they respond, "4 is not a conclusive sample size. Seriously, what sort of bullshit are you trying to use us to pull?" Cause if they didn't I wouldn't listen to them.

>>136566849

It makes me suicidal to think that a woman with these qualifications probably makes more as a "VP of Diversity" than I will ever make as an attorney who went to much better schools.

This is late-stage capitalism, and it sucks for people like me.

>>136574322
I hope there will be Google schism. Maybe we will have a based Google and a cucked Google

File: IMG_0561.jpg (85KB, 568x335px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 568x335px

>>136577034
I would like to see that, Google broken up and a revolution in Silicon Valley

the russians are quick making wikileaks to post this shit

>>136576374
The left is now encroaching on their territory just like the fundamentalist religious right did with evolution around 10 years ago. At this point the left and the right have just about swapped places.

File: FK.png (10KB, 381x374px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 381x374px

>>136577029
>capitalism

>>136574322

Brilliant.

>>136577029
Dude I went to U of M. Its a pretty good school for engineering, but that aside its Business school is well known and has a pedigree, which like Law Schools opens doors for you at the bottom of prestigious companies. But someone with her degrees (unless she got massive credentials between graduating and working at Google) probably got her position by knowing people, who she probably made connecs with at grad school that and she played to a current trend - whether you like it or not, which gives her a tactical advantage. If you want to make more money why don't you sell your soul and become Executive Legal Council for Imigration Action or some such bullshit at a blue chip company to stop drumpffft you could make a ton of money by virtue signalling, not do much else, but make your employees lives a little bit worse

>>136577298
>I would like to see that, Google broken up and a revolution in Silicon Valley

The only "revolution" you'll see in Silicon Valley is when the hype ends (((their))) pyramid schemes come tumbling down. Look up "Juicero", and you'll begin to see how easy it is for a conman to bilk angel investors out of hundreds of millions.

>>136577034
The left will grow inside Google until it's frequent infighting and witch hunts eat the company from the inside.

>>136577656
>Dude I went to U of M.


I grew up in Michigan, but chose SUNY-Binghamton over UofM because I didn't know if I'd be able to transfer into Ross. Binghamton actually turned out to be a lot less bluepilled than UofM.

>>136574276
Evolutionary psychology is one of the most important scientific fields of study atm, faggot.

>>136577801
I feel a crash coming on soon. Rolling....

File: huffpo how to tell your kids about drag culture.jpg (134KB, 1310x978px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1310x978px

>>136565191

I don't understand why you faggots insist on archiving everything.

If its a story you don't want getting page views (some insipid liberal tripe you're posting for a laugh or as an example of degeneracy) then you archive it; but if its something that supports your position then why the fuck are you going out of your way to keep the page from registering hits?

File: Screenshot_20170808-142947.png (155KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 720x1280px

This is very accurate.

>>136576817
Hey retard. Each of them happens to be an expert on one of the topics on which the """anti-diversity screed""" touched. None of them cares about saying "this is what all scientists think!", but rather they care about opining where they can. If you can make an informed statement about something controversial (and not get your head chopped off as they would have had that unbearable cunt Clinton won) then you absolutely should weigh in.

File: nigger.jpg (43KB, 1129x262px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1129x262px

>>136565191
>Daily Reminder
Keep.Up.The.Pressure
Push this story with the original memo, we are already making them sweat.

File: science.png (33KB, 931x237px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 931x237px

>>136574276

>>136578301
Holy fuck! It's that gay devil from the Powerpuff Girls!

are you snowflake cucks getting decent ad-promoted query results on your alt-search engine?

good for you.

just wait a week before a hundred counter theories/empirical data are shared by other experts. you understand how consensus in science works, right?

>>136579242
That things head on a pike should be the official start to the purge.

>>136565191
The synopsis of that link is that "diversity" should be about utilizing people's genetic differences to our advantage in the business world, instead of doing it because of feels, and that you can't have both "diversity" and "equality" at the same time. Google is all about feels because they're too public now and their groupthink is fucking retarded trying to mix the two.

>>136568225
This. So many /pol/aks and people on the right are terrible at making arguments. It's why the left's cancer spreads so easily

File: 1502181892443.jpg (70KB, 615x687px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 615x687px

>>136565191

>>136579372
Reddit
mother
fucking
spacing

File: lee-unitetheright.jpg (146KB, 769x1024px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 769x1024px

>>136577029
>It makes me suicidal to think that a woman with these qualifications probably makes more as a "VP of Diversity" than I will ever make as an attorney who went to much better schools.

Think about the anons that created the rebellion on /pol/ a few years ago. They get nothing, while you have a job.

They won't even be mentioned by the e-celebs that become celebs by taking the memes and arguments, because even the pro-white e-celebs want all the honor for themselves.

>>136565191
>Calling psychologists scientists

The is new for /pol/

>>136578048
>theoretical assumptive psychology with no basis in actual science is one of the most important scientific fields of study

File: julian.jpg (224KB, 556x712px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 556x712px

>>136579529

Believe me or not, but the only time I have seen Assange butthurt, was when somebody implied that he was anti-white.

>>136579466
Buzz words (sometimes) mixed with the ability to write and a little Socratic Method sprinkled in.

If /pol/aks just read up a little on Socratic method and learned to fucking write, this would solve itself. You don't even need fucking research to argue with a leftist. The left doesn't use it, and introducing facts will just allow them to argue the source is invalid.

State a thesis, have them agree with it, label the thesis as false
break it down into smaller chunks
invalidate the chunks they agree with
Put it all together as a bundle of shit and watch them melt down

can I have a quick rundown abot this Google Memo? what is it and what happened?

>>136578301
The original link wouldn't load for me otherwise I would have used it.

>>136580275
google it.

>>136576817
What would sampling have to do with anything there you fucking retard?

>>136580236
>everybody is so dumb
>everybody but me LOL
>like, have you even heard of fucking PLATO?
>BAKA

>>136574276
>sexual neuroscience
This one is the most jewish. I bet it has nothing to do with eugenics. I bet "evolutionary psychology" has nothing to do with struggle or will either

>>136580439
i kek'd a bit

>>136578301
in case it gets taken down / changed
as information is wanton to do, when it is hosted by the ____
[redacted]
[page no longer available]
[these are not the infos you were looking for]

File: crazy bitches.png (82KB, 1019x782px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1019x782px

>>136579096

File: transcript.png (98KB, 624x598px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 624x598px

>>136580275
It's basically what /pol/ talks about when it comes to female/male differences and the effect on the 'gap' in tech.

However it's almost laughable how hard he tries to make it clear he's talking about normal distribution graphs and not individuals, and tries his hardest to underline the fact that gender differences only partially explain the gap in tech.

His 3000 word document was instead summarized as a sexist attack on women in Google.

File: old ways.jpg (121KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1280x720px

>>136580538
kinda early for such hateful lashouts lol. Then again that's why i keep coming back.

>BAKA
lol

>>136579465
really, it's about treating people like individuals. many people on /pol/ could stand to learn from that too.

>>136578056
Alan Greenspan recently claimed a massive crash is coming. Pepper your angus.

File: 1500771135755.jpg (70KB, 600x640px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x640px

>>136579407
Agreed on this.

So everyone ITT actually thinks women are not cut out for coding as well as a man?

If you read the MEMO it's all obviously pseudo-science. The gendeers are actually able to reach the same heights and any differences we observe are the results of environment as opposed to genetic.

I'm disappointed that an obviously clever man can arrive at such a bullshit conclusion, but we are all liable to make mistakes.

>>136579466
The left spreads its cancer through propaganda, group think and shaming tactics. You can't argue with these people so I rarely try.

>>136580868
while I'm sure that many in this thread do think that, that isn't the point of the memo.

File: images.jpg (6KB, 284x177px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 284x177px

>>136574322
Here we go again.

>>136574520
thats funny because psychologists are psychology

just like teachers are teaching

and bakers are beking

wait...

>>136580868
>I didn't read the article
Is it payday, shill?

>>136580868
If they are then you'd think there'd be more female pioneers in technology historically. I wonder what gender the people were that made the very landscape of software into the current era when it was getting started and people were coding out of their basements.

REALLY MAKES ME HMMM

>>136578301
Because you simpleton, almost no site universally supports any political view. They are businesses who only publish shit to get views. They'll post something left leaning with just as much gusto as something right leaning (or vice-versa) if they think there's a good business case for it. Many of the larger sites where you might consider the site to be wholly leaning one way or another are owned by entities that fucking publish other sites that lean the other way.

Additionally, one of the best ways to scare a site that's publishing content away from publishing that kind of content is to show them for a fact that their traffic is coming from /pol/. The only people who actively court this site for views are sperglords who cannot get a mainstream audience to save their lives.

>>136580868
>pseudoscience

How are you different from flat earthers, anti vaccers, and or climate change deniers (the ones that absolutely deny anything is happening) ?

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf

https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/jaro2011/SPP457/um/23632422/Hakim_2006.pdf

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00320.x/abstract

Is research that isn't one hundred percent aligned with your views simply 'fake' research? Very convenient.

>The gendeers are actually able to reach the same heights and any differences we observe are the results of environment as opposed to genetic.

The author never said it was impossible to reach the same heights. Claiming that any differences are 100 percent environmental is insane and not supported by science.

>>136580868

>it's all obviously pseudo-science.

No it isn't.

>>136576112
In my uni, the only non-leftists Student Representation Board Party (not sure how the translate the actual name, but that's what they are) was formed by the engineers. It is called The Alliance for Freedom, and was pretty fucking based when it was still under the old leader (who graduated and now left).

Stem is who will save the world

>>136581175
it's less to do with ability and more to do with interest.

>>136581391
It has more to do with the fact that women are grown up children.

>>136565191

AKSCHTUALLY,

it's one "scientist", who has probably never done any science in her life, and three psychologists who have definitely never done any science in their lives.

Idk why people feel the need to qualify shit as "science" to make their blog post or w/e they're selling have more legitimacy. it would be more legitimate to say that 3 college professors and a whore respond.

>>136581175
>>136581323
>>136581340

>female pioneers in tech
Like the NASA scientist who wrote the backbone of the code for the spaceshuttle?

You also have to take into account females are conditioned (not born into) a way of life that pushes them toward 'feminine' jobs and interests. Few girls are unresponsive to the propaganda which is why they become incredibly succesful, but if we as a society stopped pushing male and female through human shaped cookie cutters and telling them what they should be instead of telling them to be what they want to be.

>>136579466
we need to stop making arguments - they simply won't work on a good number of people. redpill who you can with arguments, but use faux moral outrage against deranged leftists - find examples of leftist policies which have resulted in utter catastrophe (not hard), maybe it will force them to think

>>136577872
Black women makeup the majority of college graduates. I find Google's lack of diversity sickening and socislly irresponsible. A black woman deserves to be google ceo.

File: 5325235326.jpg (15KB, 532x320px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 532x320px

>>136581391
I wonder if people tend to be more interested in the things they are more able at doing.

>>136581588

>if I can pull an outlier, clearly that means women should be 1:1 represented

Cool story.

>>136577801
>Look up "Juicero"

Top keks for anyone who got scammed on that one. Hahaha

>>136579466
its hard to argue with someone just repeatedly yelling rape the entire time you're talking.

>>136581658
It squeezes a bag of juice that's already made....

Um, like, just squeeze the juice out of the bag with your hands???

>by stigmatizing anyone who disagrees as a bigot and instituted authoritarian policies of reverse discrimination

>Claims to be scientific
>Uses language like reverse discrimination

File: Captura de Tela 2017-08-08 às 11.06.38.png (255KB, 668x687px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 668x687px

Uk the guardian version of it:

>Damore’s assertions about gender are, frankly, guff dressed up with pseudo-scientific jargon: not just belittling women, but reducing men to the status of unemotional individualistic robots.

> It offers an insight into the male backlash that was one contributory factor – among many – to the rise of Donald Trump (ironically, it’s hard to think of a more neurotic, irrational, “emotional” public figure).

>>136581588
>gender roles are the result of propaganda
looooooooooooooooooooooooool

>>136581909
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/08/google-sexist-memo-alt-right-martyr-james-damore

link to it

>>136581969
Archive https://archive.is/X34x9

File: climate_change_dat.jpg (288KB, 1330x676px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 1330x676px

>>136581582

>scientists say...

The evolutionary argument is such bullshit like these idiots think the 50's model of the family represents how humanity evolved.

Did female cavemen not have to look out for and fight off the same predators? Did they not have to defend their tribe under attack from other tribes? Did they not have to dodge the same rocks and carry off the baby-cavekids to safety?

Fucking idiots.

>>136581550
says the NEET virgin

>>136581621
you should study this and find out. people value different things. for some, status and money are more important than anything else, while others aren't as motivated by those things and would prefer a more modest salary in exchange for time to spend on pleasure pursuits.

a lot of you have a real problem with talking out of both sides of your mouth. you claim to support what this man has written in his memo but I think you're so blinded by your rabid hate toward women that you don't realize he doesn't even believe what you do.

>>136577029
>This is late-stage capitalism

No, this is early-stage socialism. It's all downhill from here.

>>136574276
you went full retard

File: minskymoment.png (21KB, 1000x650px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 1000x650px

>>136581850
>It squeezes a bag of juice that's already made....
>Um, like, just squeeze the juice out of the bag with your hands???

I can't believe they actually had real companies invest in that. I'm guessing it had to do with the subscription delivery & customer tracking. Still though, holy fucking Minsky moment.

http://archive.is/2xETN

>>136582205
I'm not NEET or virgin you stupid nigger

>>136581175
The first code ever made was by a woman

>>136582274
even if you're not, there are many on this board who are, and they're male. any woman with any job is already doing better than they are. how does that fit into your worldview?

>>136577029
How much do you make?

>>136574276
that fucking flag every time
>refugees welcome

kys faggot

>>136576817
Facts are universal.
It doesn't matter who says them, all the scientists have to do is present the research, data, or studies that support the statements they're making.
Since they work in that particular field, then it probably stands to reason that they know which studies are particularly relevant to the points in contention.

>>136582022

You seem to be under some assumption that the paper is arguing that women can't enter the field.

That's not what it's about.

You are letting your own emotional bias cloud the content.

>>136582393
Its something I don't think about because I don't care. I know women with great careers and very smart. They're still emotional children. They simply do not have the mental fortitude that men have.

>>136580517
>>136580517
>>136580517
>>136580517

Are google /ourguys/?

>>136582002
Ok you convinced me, I will archive every link ever!

>>136582393
>even if you're not, there are many on this board who are, and they're male.
Are you trying to make a point? Majority of STEM majors are men because men prefer those jobs whereas women prefer arts.
>inb4 muh sexist propaganda

>>136582022
lol

>>136582022
>The evolutionary argument is such bullshit

Everyone look at this non-scientific ideologue and laugh.

>>136582655
Clearly this memo was a false flag for google to simultaneously virtue signal and punish an insensitive misogynistic (((white))) male.

>>136581909
>>136581969
i just want these creatures to stop existing

>>136582749
you'll get better results if you try to follow the conversation from the beginning.
>>136581391
>it's less to do with ability and more to do with interest.

>>136580236
>you don't need to research to argue
Here's a (you)
I debate, I don't argue.
You need to know what you're talking about if you're going to speak about it.

>>136579042
Nigger, investors haven't even noticed this.

You have to realize institutional ownership accounts for 70% of google's outstanding shares. This means there are *maybe* 1000 people that actually make the stock move up and down.

This memo and the reaction to it means nearly nothing to google's business in the short term, which is the only thing most of those 1000 money managers can actually think about, regardless of how they'd tell you otherwise

>>136581909
But don't leftists claim that women are better than men because men are unemotional, individualistic robots?

>>136582813
Quite honestly, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if there weren't some level of truth to it being a false flag.

I mean right now, they're under investigation for sexual discrimination in pay practices...think of the optics of this versus that. And that lawsuit is precisely why they couldn't keep him even if they wanted to.

>>136582307
Did it make sandwiches?

>>136582923
>>it's less to do with ability and more to do with interest.
Yeah and women aren't interested in coding and engineering. Why? Because they prefer the Arts. It has nothing to do with social engineering or whatever propaganda you think is being pushed.

>>136582936
An argument is a debate. Argument just means your position you're defending.

>>136583185
Probably, also it was made on a machine a man created.

>>136581909
We have to stop treating them like humans

>>136582936
>I debate, I don't argue.
Debating is literally worthless. The purpose of debate is not to find the truth, but to win. It presupposes that absence of proof is proof of absence. Further, it gives the victory to the one that can find or remember more sources even if the opposing view is fully correct and it's merely a failure on the one presenting that side to disprove the other.

Debate is nothing but sophistry and intellectual masturbation.

>>136565191
yep and they have now fired the dude that dared to have a different opinion

>>136580578
You never know; they might be trying to figure out what synapses criss cross in the brain and cause trannies, so they can fix it and prevent more trannies.

Can we go back to using 'Google' as a racial slur? I miss that.

>>136578751
well said

>>136578301
>I don't understand why you faggots insist on archiving everything.
look at the original link.
it doesn't work anymore.
THIS is why we archive EVERYTHING.

>>136581175
women invented liquid paper, kevlar, and a shitload of other things.

>>136577029
It's the lack of capitalism that is the problem. Western society is post-capitalism steering into deep socialism. Eventually we will end up in a communist super state that wants to police every single thing you do and where the government and big corporations become one to seize all the assets for themselves.

>>136582022
>Did they not have to defend their tribe under attack from other tribes?

When have women ever participated in mass, armed conflict?

>>136577656
>she probably did this and this and this, therefore this
your premises are assumptory nonsense, and you should feel like a fucking retard for having such a crippled capacity for critical thinking and then trying to convince other people with your awful reasoning.

>>136579466
>>136579466
REMINDER;

REMINDER

REMINDER

THE POINT OF AN ARGUMENT ISNT TO CHANGE YOUR OPPONENTS VIEWS; ITS TO CONVINCE THOSE LISTENING TO THE DEBATE THAT YOURE RIGHT

>>136579573
>subculture bullshit meme
it's internet spacing that has been around since before your mom queefed you out, retard.

>>136565191
>sees his Harvard credentials
>oh yes, he is totally fucking right

bet these "scientists" (since when is social studies considered science?) haven't read a journal in ages

File: 1501534279973.jpg (36KB, 540x356px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 540x356px

>>136584085
this

>>136583985
Am I supposed to be impressed? This is such a weak argument and not relevant to the discussion of coding in any way.

>so what if theyre not good at x, they did y and that makes x invalid

Fuck off retard

>>136576374
>These dudes basically run our society,
Lawyers, businessmen and rabbis run our society, you fucking retard

STEM folk are just wageslaves. Uf they don't do as they are told, they are replaced
>Shekelbergstein trillionaire pays me 100,000 a year to design guns he'll use against me, that means I run this country!
Laughing my ass off

>>136578301
this is 4chan, we never forget we never forgive.
Archiving it puts a layer more on your grave

>>136566849
Carbs are only unhealthy if the rest of your diet is unhealthy and you don't exercise.

>>136583429
>Debating is literally worthless. The purpose of debate is not to find the truth, but to win. It presupposes that absence of proof is proof of absence. Further, it gives the victory to the one that can find or remember more sources even if the opposing view is fully correct and it's merely a failure on the one presenting that side to disprove the other.
>Debate is nothing but sophistry and intellectual masturbation.

Winner Winner, Chicken Dinner!

Problem is the dismissive attitude by those who refuse to engage in discussion in a form other than debate. Best to beat them at their own game to shut them the fuck up.

File: IMG_5887.gif (137KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 500x375px

>>136565191
Bump. A good read. Only up to third scientist.

>>136566376
>didn't even read it.
you think these idiots actually have the intelligence or attention span to read 10 pages of cited rational arguments? fuck no.

File: ancient african.jpg (269KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 600x800px

>>136573924
REEEEEE

>>136582422
140k/year as a first-year associate in a secondary legal market. I'll be starting in the fall, as I just graduated this past May.

>>136574322
topkek

File: 1451076807595.jpg (155KB, 663x521px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 663x521px

>>136581909

>hard to think of a more neurotic, irrational, "emotional" public figure

what is a mirror, Alex?

File: 1501534253468.gif (540KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 225x225px

>>136582022
>patriarchy only existed in the 50's

File: fake-search-results.gif (34KB, 800x412px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 800x412px

>>136583582

>>136579695
They have all the reward they need.

They did it not for honor.
But UUUU

File: ave Caesar.jpg (1MB, 1014x1568px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1014x1568px

>>136585631
>forgetting that logic is also involved in a debate
only fucking idiots who can't into logic are convinced simply because of "more sources" and logical fallacies like appealing to ignorance as you mentioned. Exposing sophistry is part of the debate. Engaging in a discussion when you disagree will only lead to pussified centrist compromise. Expose logical fallacies, non-arguments, and other bullshit. Use your superior intellect. Fucking fight back

>>136566490
It's the Petersons of the world getting tired of this bullshit.

>>136586828
Good for you, anon. I hope you kick the asses of all the kike lawyers.

File: semetic smile.jpg (458KB, 871x633px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 871x633px

>>136582936
implying that you can't pick apart doublethink without (((research))) from (((verified sources)))

>>136576011
>sexual neuroscience
>science
Oooh look my neurons are firing up, my dick is diamonds.

Am I a PhD yet?

File: dan ashcroft.gif (928KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 480x270px

>>136567024
>The ABSOLUTE STATE of these fucking idiots
>tfw when /pol is terrible but free as fuck so we'll all be doxxed until we abandon our freedom to shitpost anonymously and share shitposts

File: zippy bungle.jpg (58KB, 1100x851px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1100x851px

>>136568225
BASED Aussie Didgeridoo Dundee, what was /pol like before every thread was filled almost entirely with
>Muh white male genocide

File: blue eyes white pepe.jpg (127KB, 500x729px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 500x729px

>>136578751
>human sexes
>human races

Ummmmm ... someone hasn't been taking their blue pills as prescribed!

File: stef.jpg (5KB, 225x224px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 225x224px

>>136581909
>entire article based on feelings about what someone wrote
you can all thank women for legitimizing this practice

>>136579042
>0.15% decrease
oh shit alphabet completely btfo, how will they recover??

>>136582813
It wasn't only to punish one male. It was a simple test to find out who is aligned with their policy and who isn't. So if you declare that you understand the concerns of the memo you're added to watchlist. This could be one purpose I think.

File: 1501174894007.jpg (25KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x480px

>>136581323
The earth is flat, pic related.

>>136565191
100 percent off all scientists agree though!!!!! REEEEE

>>136565191
>So, psychological interchangeability makes diversity meaningless. But psychological differences make equal outcomes impossible. Equality or diversity. You can’t have both.

And THAT is the heart of the issue.

>>136582022
>Did female cavemen not have to look out for and fight off the same predators?
No, that's what men are for
> Did they not have to defend their tribe under attack from other tribes?
No, that's what men are for
> Did they not have to dodge the same rocks and carry off the baby-cavekids to safety?
No, if the enemy tribe has gotten close enough to the cave to hurl rocks at them then they're already raped

>>136582655
it's left eating left, but it's also an opportunity to strike at google. Passing that up because the guy who did it wasn't screaming 1488 seems pretty damn retarded to me.

File: charlesbarkley.jpg (93KB, 631x702px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 631x702px

>>136585531

File: 1474783701152.png (586KB, 1360x682px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 1360x682px

>>136583582

>>136576112

Now if only the computer and electrical STEM people came out en masse and spoke up about how weak the work of most female and diversity hires is and how the white males have to carry them.

>>136585352
they invented stuff you never will
go fucking hang yourself nigger

>>136579042
We need to push on social media for people to stop using Google until they hire this guy back. We just need a catchy hashtag.

>>136588397
Sexual neuroscience is a branch of neuroscience, which is an important af field of science you retard

File: ride.png (85KB, 219x229px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 219x229px

>appeal to christian sympathies to give voting "rights" to women and minorites
>offer gibs
>grow state power
>let women + etc. feed off of welfare state
>women no longer need men
>women's influence grows over men
>government subsidized media mouthpeices appeal to this
>never have to win arguments again, just sperg out and whine
>woman instinct kicks in and they are instantly on board
>not enough strong, influential men to steer women on the right path because
>men either are taxed to death or they opt out of their federally mandated cucking

please tell me that this is not the ride I'm on

>>136590692
>muh dick
Fuck off, cunt.

>>136579042
We need to just push ad blocker shit. For real that is like cancer to google

>>136580008
A new low you mean. But leftists love psychology. Using it against them will break their brain.

>>136574276
WOW you mean to tell me that professors of psychology comment on psychology research????


If you're going to say that all psychology researchers can't be trusted then you might as well say that all psychology research can't be trusted which is basically sticking your fingers in your ears and going "LAH LAH LAH LAH I CAN'T HEAR YOU . LAH LAH YOU CAN'T KNOW NOTHING"

File: tigersurfboardtsunami.png (52KB, 500x706px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x706px

>>136590717
Sorry, and matriarchy is incompatible with civilization, therefore this is all going to end in a spectacular economic, social, and political collapse coinciding with the largest and fastest human migration in this history of the species. There be dragons where we're heading.

>>136580746
Except that /pol/ does exactly what he says shouldn't be done.

>>136574322
Saved, checked, and kek'd

>>136565191
BASED ASSANGE
A
S
E
D

>>136579466
I disagree. Sure people here vent with a REEEEEEEE now and then (ok 95% of the time ), but the actual arguments become very solid. Which is why /pol/ is a threat, and why it's always getting raided.

>>136582022
>>136580868
these are both intentionally stupid troll posts

File: google.jpg (48KB, 1008x343px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1008x343px

....

>>136565191
PLS somebody post the link to the actual Memo. I'm sure one of you fags has it.

>>136574322
Incredible.

>>136566849
Only evil people go to college in Michigan

>>136591572
Patriarchy is suitable for a self-sustained civilization and Matriarchy is perfect for parasitic cultures

>>136579529
Democrats are anti white. Full into identity politics. The question is if "we" can use the momentum and make politics out of a race.

That breaks democracy.

>>136574398
>he thinks Psychology was invented by jews

you're confusing psychology, psychological research and psychoanalysis (that's what Freud the fraud invented).

>>136593384
http://diversitymemo.com/

File: fem holes.jpg (239KB, 647x1080px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 647x1080px

>>136582205
>says the NEET virgin

>>136582022
>Did female cavemen not have to look out for and fight off the same predators?
No, that is why they stayed in the fucking cave you retard. Secured in a cave, secured by a fire

If done properly this can be our gamer gate for normies

>>136582022
Wow its almost like the moment we stopped expecting women to fend off predators and be men civilization started

>inb4 muh modern independence
Modern women independence is just an elaboration on "stop expecting women to fend off predators", the whole system that "gives independence to women" is built under the assumption that women should be also saved from male predators. Divorce laws, abortion, equal salary under maternal leave, handouts, women institutions, women ongs, it all revolves around protecting women and taking more of their responsabilities(freedom) from them

>>136574322
Can someone submit this to ED picture of the now. I can't login. I don't care about recognition

>>136582205
tits or gtfo

>>136582022
>Did female cavemen not have to look out for and fight off the same predators?

Nope, kill yourself retard. It was men that chased Mammoths down for miles until they got tired and gave up, women don't have the endurance

>>136565191
What is this Google Memo bullshit all about?

File: 1496460894861.jpg (115KB, 766x960px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 766x960px

>>136566849
fml, account suspended
this is a wrongthink dystopia

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 7.51.28 PM.png (437KB, 1054x998px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1054x998px

>>136565191
>https://archive.is/z6xxP
This is what happens when you mix white and chink

not good

>>136580868
If you mean this in that it isn't a peer reviewed study using the scientific method, you are correct.

If you are arguing that what he is saying isn't backed by science, you are dead fucking wrong. There are many studies demonstrating the psychological and physical differences between men and women, and the Dr. who wrote this memo is spot on.

>>136577029
are you implying we've gotten more capitalist as time goes on?

>>136599547
Someone dared to spread this memo at Google.

They got shitcanned for stating the truth plainly and reasonably.

>>136599547
https://pastebin.com/qmXsEY5a

>>136587449
Pretty good. Saved.

>>136599876
What she says is good.

>>136600041
kek. Trying to reason with jews. No wonder he got fired.
If only every white male employee at jewgle gtfo of there at once.

liberals eating their own, so tasty
soon those femsluts won't have any more beta male soldiers

>>136578301
archiving is so that
1). Nobody gets ad revenue from the massive amount of traffic we generate on sites
2). If it gets taken down, we can always laugh at it.

>>136574276
>bachelor’s degree and Ph.D. in personality psychology from the University of Michigan.
>Not a total shitlib
Incredible, I'm not alone!

>>136579529
fake, not from verified assange´s account.

>>136584885
Newfag, lurk moar.
Your faggot ass doesnt realize how obvious it is to spot you fucking retards who visit here with your cancerous kike thought and splurge on our boards.

Off yourself faggot.

File: 1498896670713.jpg (65KB, 400x612px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 400x612px

>>136584787

Good post.

File: d1965b0de7cfb76c.jpg (58KB, 700x799px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 700x799px

>>136566849

I get hsi point, but carbs are neccesary and healthy, but you need the right ones and as fresh as possible.

>>136588572

>tfw someone else is Moonposting

File: nevillebaumshoot.png (506KB, 566x463px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 566x463px

>>136588572
forgot pic

File: I show you bastard.jpg (125KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1920x1080px

>>136604445
>>136604499
>I bloody showing you the moonposting you burger of the star and stripey bastard

>>136565191

Why did you archive this? Some sights deserve the hits for putting out good articles like this.

>>136565191
For shame /pol/ and Wikileaks, this was on Kotaku in Action a good 12 hours ago

File: dyke.jpg (192KB, 1200x441px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1200x441px

>>136582205

>>136565191
also for those who have Zeronet installed (protip:its super easy, look on zeronet.io)

The original memo:
http://127.0.0.1:43110/1MUeJj6YB7iESUokH6sXJ6DExESfwUEc9z/

(yes its a local adress, thats not a mistake, you need Zeronet running)

>>136580868
>Sources peer reviewed research
>Obviously pseudo-science
Found the retard

>>136582307
ada lovelace was just a thot that hung around a married mathematician and did his grunt work for him. back then being the one to do the actual "programming" was idiot's work. the idea that lovelcace had some deep abstract understanding of logic and machines is just fucking laughable.

>>136582002
Thank you based Nord. I always knew your people were the shit

>>136579372
>how consensus in science works
yep, because in the scientific method it says 'your hypothesis is correct when most people believe it'
kys, dumbfuck

These are the same people who won't agree that black people commit more crimes

>>136577029
you didn't work hard enough

>>136599876
>>136599876
toronto BASED

>>136581588
>>136581588
I'm glad to see a reasonable person here.

Also, let's not forget about Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper, Hedy Lamarr and Margaret Hamilton, to name just a few, since everyone around here seems unaware that their ingenuity and ability is the very reason they have a PC to speak of and the freedom to voice their opinions.

Women have been barren from science, politics, economics and even public spaces, giving them thankless and menial roles, and even under such oppression they have found ways to leave a mark on the world, sometimes making it a better place for mankind; such is human nature. They are barely different from men, but we still actively discourage them to introduce themselves in STEMS just to make room for more men.

>>136566376
A majority of all objectors and critics never bother to figure out what it is they're opposed to. Same goes for /pol/

>>136606266
This, science isn't built on consensus.

>>136606915
Now, I understand that campaigns to make women aware that there is no barrier to pursue a career in science (provided that and individual is both interested and capable, something that the females of our species have proven to be) seem to be ubiquitous and overbearing, but they are not: they simply exist now, and are visible to achieve its mission. They should not make any man uncomfortable, just aware that women are as valuable in multiple roles as men, even if there are plenty of elitist that desire to feel superior by undeservingly putting down half the population (which should go without saying, but this also goes for anyone who thinks that being a man is an undue free pass to success and that males are to be given a hard time for pursuing their goals).

Criticism is good, but don't feel threatened by women's presence and don't let those feelings take hold of reality.

>>136565191
The chick is the only actual scientist
Lol

>>136607418
Also, if we take into account that men have been the only people allowed in science, suggesting a 50% of representation is nothing crazy, just fairness, as long as men form the other half and both parts are capable (which plenty of people assume is unrealistic, under the impression that this quota will shoehorn unprepared and incapable women into positions on which they will underperform in the name of a so called "social justice", but that fear is not relevant, or at least shouldn't be deemed so, since we willfully ignore that plenty of male scientist right now aren't the epitome of their profession, and we don't question their ability and stand as much as their female counterparts).

That said, gender dynamics seem to be so off in the USA: your efforts to promote equality, especially in college, are somewhat heavy-handed and ineffective, making the whole endeavor wrongfully look like a project not worth advocating for.

>>136574276
>Science doesn't count if it disagrees with me!
wew lad

>>136578751
Saved

File: a8ytn3h.png (204KB, 495x851px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 495x851px

>>136565191
I'm hard.

>>136595502
Spot on. It's amazing how accurate that picture is.

>>136582937
>This means there are *maybe* 1000 people that actually make the stock move up and down.
Time to start naming names. Thanks to Google setting the precedent it's now fair game.

>>136580868
If the genders are equal then what's the point of diversity. Diversity is impossible if everyone is equal

>>136607794
Waifu material.

>>136607965
Sex weirdo.

Go on...

>>136579042
Call me when it drops 10%

>>136608049
>yo soy una fresa
cuck

>>136583985

>invented

Actually she had a chemist help her but she thought of it?

Well, i just thought of an interplanetary transportation system that also gives the user immortality so i guess you can mark me down for that one when i find someone to invent it for me thnx

>>136608049
What else is there to say? She seems like she has a good head on her shoulders, is properly educated, seems to avoided ideological brainwashing, and is cute.

>>136608268
>Penis fracture.

>>136581909
>Literature was censored for supposed "opressiveness"
>Questioning official diversity policy could lead to being ostracised, even fired in many western nations
>You could be arrested as a man for posting an offensive comment on Twitter
>The lived experiences of millions of white men were erased from culture

See, I can write in a pompous, pretentious style too!

>>136582022
>Did female cavemen not have to look out for and fight off the same predators?
No, women were precious resources to be protected at all costs because without women, the tribe dies off. Thus sending women to fight predators instead of disposable men would be suicidal for the group
>Did they not have to defend their tribe under attack from other tribes?
See above.
>Did they not have to dodge the same rocks and carry off the baby-cavekids to safety?
Well, they did carry off baby-cavekids, so I suppose you have like 0.1% of a point... But in all seriousness, you're a fucking idiot and this is what feminist revision of prehistory has brought us.

File: 1487370966960.jpg (56KB, 960x463px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 960x463px

>>136607794
/ourneuroscientist/

>>136602733
yes the only account made from 2011 with 300k followers is fake

>>136608124
this incident won't mean a damn thing.
but it's a crack in the wall where the employee morale is going to seriously crack in a year or so.

the constant "i won't work with so and so because he said a mean thing to james one time last year" keeping of lists that all these employees are talking about is gonna have HR curled up under their desks weeping and all the other managers going "wtf, do your job."

it's clearly a situation thats rapidly expanding within the company and is wholly untenable for any sort of functional structure.

all these little assholes are openly declaring they have little fiefdoms inside the company and are at war with other fiefdoms inside the company and will kill or have fired people who tresspass.

this guy being fired isn't the problem.
his entire paper was specifically writing about this problem and how untenable it was; so the truth of the paper in the long run will be the company's radical restructuring or downfall.

>>136574443
>>136575714
>>136576011
>>136578048
>>136582213
>>136591293
>>136602419
>>136607644
>/pol/ when a psychology professor disagrees with them
>PSYCHOLOGY ISN'T REAL IT'S MADE UP BY THE JEWS
>/pol/ when a psychology professor agrees with them
>Psychology is a legitimate profession and I'm glad to see them agree with me.

>>136608916
yahoo seemed too big and powerful and important to the internet to die off and now its on its deathbed fighting for life. google now holds the same spot yahoo did in '99. they aren't above a fall, nobody is.

>>136609049
>/pol/ is one person.

>>136609049
>I posted psuedo-science once and was called out on it!
By all means, post an expert in the field that disagrees with her then. Can't wait.

>>136608916
This is the basic structure of female thinking. It's exactly why it's been a joke for women to be in power since when the Greeks were a super power.

Women keep these long long spiteful hate lists about how many times you inadvertently left the fridge open for 4 seconds longer than normal and ruminate about it for 6 years then explode on you.

The only problem now is that women are being given power to just pussy whine you out of a job with it. They just need to be told to shut the fuck up.

>>136609177
>It's psuedo-science if I disagree with it

File: IMG_3278.png (273KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 2000x2000px

Anyone have more of these?

>>136609297
It's pseudo science if it disagrees with itself.

>>136609059
yeah, but yahoo doubled, then tripled, then quadrupled down on upper management actively driving them into the ground.

obviously google can fall, though it's far more diversified than yahoo ever dreamed of being, but it's leadership is more likely to drive for a severe course correction at some point. especially as the original creators remain at the helm and grow older, they're more likely to put the company before ideology as time goes by.

>>136609297
I have to have something to disagree with in the first place. Feel free to post something.

>>136578301
Literally a fucking battle between heaven and hell

>women are equal to men in every aspect
>therefore only hiring men is problematic
>and only hiring women is progressive

File: 1489458364893.gif (1MB, 412x384px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 412x384px

>>136566849
>VP of diversity

File: 9b6[1].jpg (669KB, 1800x1800px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 1800x1800px

>>136609392

>>136566376
Most of /pol/ neither. But here's the TL;DR

> The author of the Google essay on issues related to diversity gets nearly all of the science and its implications exactly right.

>>136609451
There are biologist who disagrees with the current theories on how the brain works

Is biology a Pseudo science?

>>136582307
>lol I made this machine but I don't know what it does, ada can you have a look at it
women actually believe this

>>136577872
>The left will grow inside Google until it's frequent infighting and witch hunts eat the company from the inside.
Hasn't it already? Google creates products that compete with their own products, products that they create and abandon in a short period of time, constant redesigns, and haven't really innovated in anything substantial in a long time. I don't even know what their current chat solution is since it changes so much. Then they do things like buy and sell Motorola, buy and sell Boston Dynamics, make both Chrome OS and Android, frankly they look like they have no direction outside of search and ads.

File: 1502214243439.jpg (58KB, 736x414px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 736x414px

>>136609392
>>136609705

Is Trey Parker /ourguy/?
https://youtu.be/kz1tumZOaqw

>>136609705
Love these, thanks

>>136575714
>Expects the left to use fact and logic
Sorry, anon. They won't. We're eventually going to have to debate them with hot lead the way things are going.

File: 1495530976635.jpg (18KB, 304x293px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 304x293px

>>136610577
>I'm intelligent, I'm attractive
You lying bitch.

File: debra-w-sooooooohBABY.jpg (11KB, 300x241px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x241px

>>136607794
>This trend continues into the area of personality, as well. Contrary to what detractors would have you believe, women are, on average, higher in neuroticism and agreeableness, and lower in stress tolerance.

>Some intentionally deny the science because they are afraid it will be used to justify keeping women out of STEM. But sexism isn't the result of knowing facts; it's the result of what people choose to do with them.

https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/no-the-google-manifesto-isnt-sexist-or-anti-diversity-its-science/article35903359/

>>136582022
>screaming to get attention of males to fight off predators for them
>getting men to hunt and gather and fend off predators creating bonds between men
>spreading their legs to invaders
>staying in caves with children

We're all idiots guys! How did I not see it?

find a torrent
read this, clues to destroying google here
Julian Assange - When Google Met WikiLeaks.mobi

>>136574322
Kek'd and checked

>>136565191
Hahahahaha SJWs BTFO

Can someone make a salt thread? I bet theirs a lot of salt mining that can be done right about now.

>>136582022

Why would a numale come to this place, at this time in history, and post such a thing?

>>136609705
>google hangouts
My sides are in a tree too

File: IMG_0326.jpg (770KB, 2126x1397px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 2126x1397px

>>136582937

Nigger, you have no idea how price discovery works in financial markets.

File: serveimage-32.jpg (9KB, 262x193px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 262x193px

>>136574322

>>136578301
>I don't understand pol
Lurk moar.

>>136582022
>Did they not have to defend their tribe under attack from other tribes?
Pretty sure those sluts were too wet for stronger men coming to give them new stronger children. They have no loyalty to the tribe.

>>136610577
>Is Trey Parker /ourguy/?
duh.

>>136582937
>Nigger, investors haven't even noticed this.
why would investors care

Google is at the size where inertia and being in bed with the NSA is literally all that matters, they don't even have to innovate anymore (which is good, because they can't, like all large institutions) they just buy up companies (i.e. outsourcing innovation).

Google could at this point be 99% black pregnant teens, it wouldn't matter.

File: 32748924.png (442KB, 498x598px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 498x598px

>>136574322
>Protocuck Reformation 2: Redux

http://protestantism.co.uk/denominations

>>136579042
Should I sell my stock? I've made a pretty penny on googl.

>>136614133
wait until it really starts to go down then sell to boos the avalance effect.

>>136576112
I'm in my lab as I write this; in undergrad I started getting into politics during the rising of the tumblrwagon bullshit but it wasn't until grad school that I began coming to /pol/ more frequently. My entire lab, including my advisor is Chinese. I would say only 15% of my department (a very reputable materials science department) is American. The foreign students that come here though, genuinely want to learn what they can while benefitting our country, and most are very qualified for the job, coming from undergrad univeristies like Peking. So I'd like to preface by saying, despite some critical thinking differences, I have never had an issue with other races or genders in terms of intelligence at my grad school. Internally, there is not discrimination from any direction due to race or gender.

However, externally, this is where the bullshit comes in. I'd like to give an example.

I shared this story on /pol/ before, but it's relevant again. In my 1st of Grad school I applied for a fellowship research position at a government lab (related to space technology) and was denied. It was my dream to work at this place so I worked extra hard the day after getting denied to make sure I was accepted next year. Next year came around (I should also note you can only apply twice), and after about 300 hours working on just the proposal portion, let alone driving to the national lab and talking with relevant project leaders, I was denied again. I submitted for feedback from selection committee, but this time instead of reading about not having enough references, or inaccurate figures, or non-agreeable conjectures, I was told the proposal was very well done but that I didn't meet diversity qualifications that they were hoping to see. I believe the sentence was "...however, given the current political climate, we feel it is more appropriate to offer this fellowship to persons of more disadvantageous races and genders."

>>136615063
cont.

I believe I am in the right to say that my experience is not anecdotal. I work in a diverse yet qualified place that finds low representation of Americans, yet was denied because of feefees. Remember, this was your tax money.

Thanks /pol/, y'all were right again.

>>136615063
collect those stories with references and sources. They might come in handy later