What did Google mean by this?

File: a1.jpg (80KB, 1535x364px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1535x364px

Happens if you search something in nigger language

>>136563894
gday george hales, nice to meet u

>>136563894
>Google

>watch how they just un-personed someone from their business for having the wrong views

>>136563894
Search results are based on your country

>American inventors brings up old timey farm equipment
>アメリカ人発明家 brings up American inventors
weird

>>136564503
same results in Bulgaria

>>136564503
It's the same here

>>136563894
I get straight line of white people when i google in my language. Seems like american google felt for this diversity bullshit pretty hard.

>>136564620
Try in your own language

>>136563894
Search American Businessmen. At least that one is not nigrafied yet.

>>136563894
ooga booga you know you want da bbc white boi

File: Capture.png (102KB, 648x280px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 648x280px

you're not very bright are you faggot... nice email

they are working on eradicating the white race, and thats not even a meme anymore.

Its everywhere, anti-white talk is on every media, the internet, TV shows, Cinema, music.

Everywhere. America is working as hard on destroying and killing white people as hitler worked on getting rid of jews

>>136563894
>edison
>inventor

>>136565177
epic dox bro. life status: ruined.

>>136563894
hey george it was nice to meet you.

File: white-ingenuity-strikes-again.jpg (93KB, 1563x448px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1563x448px

>>136563894
Figured out a solution. Replace inventor with equivalent word from another language. Using German, Erfinder works just fine as does using Russian word изoбpeтaтeль.

Dont mind me, just using my white brain to think my way around the problem. I bet some faggot at Google literally hardcoded the search string "American inventor(s)" to spit out watermelons and fried chicken first.

>>136564220
Yes. Got similar results when I searched from Namibia.

>>136563894
Oh boy, it's another episode of anon doesn't know what he's talking about
>Google sorts results by relevance
>people are more likely to relate black investors with "(African) American inventor" than actual American inventors with just "American inventors"
>Google thinks George Washington is a lot more relevant to American inventors because of it
Next you'll be telling us to look up European People Art instead of European Portraits

That's not to say Google isn't a Jewish company. They've started to censor "hate speech" in their search results a long time ago. Pick your battles man

File: swedish-searchresults.jpg (126KB, 1559x663px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1559x663px

>>136565347
Using Swedish uppfinnare gives me a slightly worse result.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-08-03-00-59.png (809KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

809KB, 720x1280px

"American husband and wife"

Lol Google.

Someone search it in another language

>>136565520
>people are more likely to relate black investors with "(African) American inventor" than actual American inventors with just "American inventors"
That doesn't make any fucking sense. Who the hell cares about African American Inventors? There has been maybe 2-3 descent ones that actually invented something worthwhile while the rest has been peanuts, farming and random household utilities knockoff patents.

File: lolmitt.jpg (25KB, 400x283px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x283px

>>136563894
>first inventor is the peanut butter nigger

File: 1500240667056.png (21KB, 847x498px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 847x498px

>>136565177
got em

File: happy-family.jpg (243KB, 1587x756px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1587x756px

Saving this historical gem for preservation before the goodthink police perform a revisionist operation.

File: ss+(2017-08-08+at+05.06.59).jpg (582KB, 1507x867px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 1507x867px

UM GUYS???!!

File: Screenshot_2017-08-08-05-05-24.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

בַּעַל הַמצָאוֹת american

>>136565177

I'm hacking into OP's mainframe right now

Nuthin personal kid.

>>136563894

Anon, learn to crop.

It could save your life.

I didn't verify it, but one of the articles about how biased this is discussed Bing. The funniest fact from Bing is that Bill Gates is listed at #22 all time, or he was back then.

He's an awesome businessman who screwed customers and competitors alike, but he never invented shit.

It's like the sort of shit North Korea writes about their glorious leaders, like the time fat boy's grandfather played golf for the first time and got a bunch of hole-in-ones.

>>136565815
It's because of this. You guys are retarded.

Google literally treats whites as "normal". You type in family, inventors, couple, or any variation of this thread that pops up, you'll see smiling white faces. Qualify it with "American" or even any colour, and the hue will darken.

Google is shit but not for this reason. They're basically saying whites don't need a qualifier, those are for the "others". Stop being retarded on purpose.

File: finlan keksit.png (408KB, 1755x364px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1755x364px

>>136563894
Finnish results

>>136565448
>>136565581
Same reason as
>>136565520

>>136565625
Think about it like this. Let's hypothetically suggest the following
>2,000 pages talk about George Washington
>90% use the words "American" and "inventor" in them, but it also uses "African" each time before American
>10000 pages talk about Benjamin Franklin
>90% use the term "inventor"
>but 10% use the word "American"
Using these hypothetical numbers, only 900 pages talk about Benjamin Franklin being a American inventor. But twice as many pages talk about George Washington being an (African) American Inventor

Nobody at Google is writing all of this out by hand, they use scripts to sort these results. This is why you see other languages working better because not many languages call black people "African American"

>>136565529
>Swedish
What did you expect?

>>136565520
That's an interesting theory, however it's only one other interpretation.

In order to get rid of this factor, I would recommend searching in another language that has a similar term for American black (African-American) as that seen in English.

If similar results came up, we could know that it was because of the search algorithm/code.

If not, the original theory holds more water.

File: Capture.png (1MB, 1895x896px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1895x896px

>>136565520
>it's just a coincidence, goy!

>>136563894
>Implying Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone
The thief who stole Antonio Meucci's invention?

>>136566085
on the whole slide the re is 1 black guy, Alexander Graham Bell

>>136563894
Google "united states inventors", that fixes it.
They probably think you forgot the "african" before your american query

>>136566205
Search for "White Couple"
Now take away "White"

You can see it for yourself. It's not because of some agenda, it's because no right thinking person would say "White couple" unless there was some relevance to the colour of the people, so you get cuck shit.

File: american-inventors-HU.png (200KB, 1286x382px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1286x382px

>>136563894
Not necessarily Google itself manipulating the results, rather the content creators are shilling to hard for blackwashing the history of engineering and science in America.

Hungarian content creators aren't brainwashed yet and Google finds based results to display.

>>136566279
Now it's just a problem of "black and white pictures" mixing in with "male inventors". Google uses tags on the page to sort their results. Many places tag their pictures "black and white". Google's algorithm fucks up when sorting it

Look it up in any other search engine. Duckduckgo has similar results. Bing has similar results. Yahoo has similar results. I bet even Yandex does.
Now compare the results work something else. Look up jihad on those search engines. Did you spot the odd duck out? Don't you think this is a more serious issue than how Google sorts results?

>>136566672
You've explained the prevalence of black and white pictures, now explain why they're mostly Americoons.

>>136565974
>personal
>not personnel
you dun goofed, better pack it up

>>136568173
Shit man. If I knew how Google sorts its results I'd be fucking rich
All I can tell you is that DuckDuckGo does the same thing. And I don't think DuckDuckGo is overly cucked like Google is

File: B72xN8TW_400x400.jpg (49KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 400x400px

>>136563894
look it's OP

>>136569035
George has nice tits

>>136566090
Nope you are wrong as shown in
>>136565347
>>136565529
Replacing inventor with a equivalent foreign word which has to be translated back first results in a different google search output.
Google intentionally coded the search string "American inventors" to spit out certain "types" of results first which is why it breaks when you insert foreign words.
Nice trying though, shill. Go get your $5 jooogle bucks.

File: wewuzscientists.png (481KB, 1270x733px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1270x733px

>>136564220
what did they mean by this?

>>136573508
>Alexander Bell
Literally fake news.