Wikileaks offers Google employee a job

>>136562132
been waiting for this. waiting to see who did it first. now companies can pick their sides in the upcoming civil war. fucking carls jr gonna feeds us all.

Le based leak merchant! Good to hear.

>>136562830
Carl's Jr.?

>>136562132
Wikileaks on point as usual

>>136563400
Hardee's

As if wikileaks could pay his salary.

>>136563516
it can when it's under gov control

: ^ )

>expecting a company to argue with their employee who violated company policy, rather than just fire them
?

>>136562132
https://www.wesearchr.com/bounties/james-damore-official-fundraiser

Also here is a site for a defense fund. That he is trying to raise.

Brb, buying another wikileaks tshirt
Their "encrypt like it's 1984" shirt is subtle and cool

>>136563775
>violated company policy

Proofs plz

>>136562132
I'm not trying to be a shit stirrer here, but why does Wikileaks clearly have a conservative agenda? They used to be apolitical and mostly hated by the right for turning people against Bush and his wars.

>>136566093
Wikileaks doesn't have a conservative agenda, the far left has an "anti everything that isn't far left" agenda.

Even leftists from 2006 would generally be far right by modern standards (examples being Bernie, HRC and Obama).

>>136566225
THIS

>>136566093
wikileaks has access to all sorts of secret info before anyone else, confirmed and non confirmed (they publish when confirmed).

Do you think it's unlikely that they might have been redpilled by access to this info so to speak, and learned which side are the corrupt evil bad guys?

That's why they appear to be right wing now. They know the truth better than anyone.

>>136566225
I'm mostly referring to their Twitter account, what you're saying is definitely true though. I just think that they seem to be acting a lot like they're on "our side" when it comes to these little events that are always in the news, like this most recent Google thing.

If Obama made you spend 10 years in a tiny room and Clinton wanted to drone strike you why would you be a leftist?

>>136566687
Its not that its our side. He could come out tomorrow with Trumps emails or the RNC emails. He is on the side of transparency. Its just these days it seems the left is hiding a lot more.
I dont think he has any interest in US politics, but rather has an interest in seeing the world without the fog of globalism and elitism and without the fog of agenda behind agenda

>>136566687
ur projecting ur view of them

>>136566983
With this google memo thing, I can kind of grasp how what you're saying applies to Wikileaks' goal, but at the same time it gives me pause because Wikileaks never used to throw their 2 cents in on these sorts of things, and yet here is Assange posting what amounts to just rhetoric. The "censorship" angle is being played all over the conservative corners of the web, and I agree its bullshit that they fired him for wrongthink and all, but still this is just a trend I've noticed with Wikileaks lately, it doesn't necessarily amount to anything.

>>136567451
it's literally what i said here man >>136566265
wikileaks knows enough to know who the bad guys are.

>>136562132
>face of freedom and anonymity on the internet

>literally begs for googlers to join him on twitter

christ man have some self respect.