Is alt-right politics a passing trend?

>>136554664

Complacency is the kiss of death.
As long as movements need to fight and have lofty objectives ahead of them, they are vital. Once they get comfortable in power, they get fat, boring and impotent, and are replaced by others.

I say we have potentially half a century of vigorous right-wing politicking and warfare ahead of us, if we play it right!

>>136555002
I could see alt-rightism growing for 10-15 years before a new movement rises up and challenges it with legitimate arguments

>>136555313
Alt right has the most primordially legitimate argument. There isn't a wide variety of competing arguments in this game.
Only a handful.

>>136555313
>legitimate arguments
There are none. I'm not making some sort of joke or anything, I literally mean it. The alt right (or whatever you want to call it) is based on an understanding of human nature. Everything else is based on denying human nature, so in a free marketplace of ideas everything else will always lose. The only hope they hay of winning is massive censorship

>>136554664
Sargon of Akkad is paid by MTV.
Sargon of Akkad ONLY uses archive.is
That is all.

File: gettyimages-644207354.jpg (67KB, 970x647px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 970x647px

are we talking about alt-right or "Alt-Right?"

>>136556720

Or accepting their nature, and using it to milk the system, instead of making up shit like the wage gap and systemic racism to milk the system, future progressives will simple say it's genetics and they need gibs

I see the right starting to plateau. It's not just a few troublemaker "Kekistanis", it's that the new right, lets avoid the alt-right shit, is getting to the point they're combating whiny identity politics with whiny identity politics. "Redpill" threads are filled with utter misinformation or at least heavily slanted information, people repeat the arguments in public, and get resoundingly mocked. People are clearly perceiving the politics as self-serving because well, they are, that's largely the merit of them. Ultimately /pol/ is filled with teenagers and college aged shitposters and the average quality of poster has fallen as the quantity of posters has gone up. Public figureheads of this "movement" are filled with a bunch of youtube pseuds that argue with idiots, with maybe Jordan Peterson having the most credibility and even then he still says some pretty pseud things the further he gets away from psychology.

I would say the new right is a populist outburst against entrenched bullshit and I think its already changed the way public discourse is discussed. anti-immigration views are less taboo, anti-trade views are taken more seriously, BLM was largely exposed for who they were, and I'm seeing serious discontent with untouchable issues like affirmative action. There's just too much truth underlying the movement for it to be ineffectual.

Ultimately /pol/ is filled with teenagers and college aged shitposters and the average quality of poster has fallen as the quantity of posters has gone up. People need to stop bitching and crying about what the left does that doesn't hurt anybody and focus more on doing good things for the right. What the right needs is a lot of hard work and discipline to make ourselves better until the establishment and left is forced to bend the knee to the future and truth. It needs to go beyond shitposting on /pol/.

>>136559533
TL;DR kys shill