When lefties win debates in /pol/ threads.
>lefties win debates
ylyl threads are better suited for b
>>136547712
There's nothing left to debate.
you're right it doesn't exist
FREEDOM!!!
>>136548207
>>136547712
What is "winning" a debate actually? It is convincing your opponent to adopt your views - or convincing the audience to adopt your views.
I've won some debates on /pol/, by the way.
Yeah its the only time your righties win a fight...
I've never seen a leftist win anything
>>136547712
>he seriously contemplates "winning" arguments against strangers on the internet.
>>136549073
they win the pervert contest.
>>136547712
Has never happened.
Get out of here with your fantasy bs!
>When lefties shitpost a thread into nonsense believing they've won
>>136549073
WW2, the Civil War etc
>>136548880
>commie flag
Liar detected.
>>136549160
They're much better at spirit cooking too, now that I think about it. I wouldn't label those as winning qualities though.
>>136548880
suuuuuure you have
>>136547712
>When lefties win debates in /pol/ threads.
Has that ever happened? The closest they ever get is using the same technique antifa and niggers use to "win": mobbing their opponents twenty-to-one.
>>136549164
They get deleted instead of archived.
Simple.
>>136549228
>leftists won ww2 and the civil war
You're retarded
>>136549608
Name one thread where a leftist won
>>136549709
In each of those wars the more liberal side won. Prove me wrong (you can't)
>>136547712
That's how you know you did a great job kiddo,
>>136547864
>>136549608
This one's not deleted, proving your argument here lost, proving your theory is fantasy.
Lel
>>136549830
You think the civil war was about slavery? It was about stopping paid labour from competing with slave labour: which is what right wingers do today
Lincoln himself didn't give a shit about blacks
And the national socialists were in essence: LEFTISTS
>>136547712
Post archive link. We'll judge for ourselves.
>>136547712
>lefties win debates
>>136550068
>Nazis were leftist meme
Any other r/thedonald talking points you have there?
>>136549228
LOL, you think the left won WWII? Dude...
>>136549160
Think about the position of the kids hand. Portrait photographers don't do that shit by accident.
>>136547712
Threads get deleted here all the time. You probably "won" a debate in a thread that was either BBC porn bullshit or something else completely stupid.
>>136550371
Yeah those Soviets did nothing.
Resistance movements weren't left-wing commies
Kill yourself.
>>136550411
You couldn't let him have his moment of glory.
>>136550260
He just skull fucked you
>>136548880
>What is "winning" a debate actually?
being the last one to post
t. 4chan lurker
>>136549999
no because then he would have WON an argument and then this thread would get deleted
>>136548880
>I've won some debates on /pol/
>g-give me you stuff
>white people deserve extinction
Yeah, alright
>>136550260
Anyone taking the bluepill that all of a certain demographic deserve some kind of punishment is leftist.
>When /leftypol/ gets asshurt when you point out its hypocritical to insist that the conquest of the Nazi Germany proved how unsustainable its political model was, but the USSR collapsing was because the United States wasn't playing fair in the Cold War
>>136550587
>What is "winning" a debate actually?
>being the last one to post
Get extra points for being more than 20% of all posts and getting more than 50% of the (you)'s
>>136547864
>>136547712
> lefties
> winning an argument
>>136547712
Leftists argue about the minute details of Marxist theory, and when a normie can't cite the semantics correctly, they call it a victory.
>>136547712
Dont think that's ever actually happened. Leftists can't debate, that's why they have to resort to -isms and -phobias
>>136551127
>"There's nothing wrong with Marxism, its just that every time Marxists win a revolution they fuck up for some reason IT'S STILL A VALID IDEOLOGY, DAD"
>>136550965
>present your "argument"/rebuttal
>follow with a comment about how retarded they are and that they should just stop embarrassing themselves
>if they reply, repeat steps 1 and 2
>if they do not reply, you win
>>136551004
Can Cirno stop being a baka and get a 9?
>>136550260
>socialism isn't leftist
>>136550965
I see you learned the art of debate from the true master: Obamaleaf.
>>136550816
>muh not all blacks are niggers
Please fuck off to /r/the_donald
>>136551309
>what is prussian socialism: the post
>>136550649
No archive or screencap = fuck off.
I thought you master debaters knew about the importance of backing up your claims.
>lefty repeats your argument in a way that they think makes it sound stupid
>call you stupid
>declares themselves the winner
>pitch a fit when you point out they didn't refute anything
>>136551309
It really isn't the defining feature of leftism. Leftism is defined by a turn away from monarchy after the French Revolution. Fascists were still leftists since they rejected the monarchy and tradition, but something being socialist doesn't make it leftist. If a monarch were to employ socialist policies, it wouldn't be leftist. A monarch is highly unlikely to do that for a myriad of reasons though.
>>136547712
It looks more like the lefties are fucking with us then winning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObmCzalA_Ro
>>136550260
This is an example of leftist semantics.
Contemporary normies recognize that leftists parties in the west are akin to SocDem, or generally, more government control of the economy for the sake of creating gibs for the working class.
Nazi Germany was essentially Sweden economically. They had gibs galore, more than even France did at that time. German factory workers literally got free Mediterranean pleasure cruises pad for by the government.
Lefties just sperg-out because NatSoc wasn't full-blown Leninism or anarcho-communism; and they think those are the only ideologies allowed to be called "leftist" is modern vernacular; even when literally everybody else recognizes that the term "left" can refer to many things to the left of neoliberalism, such as the Swedish Social Democrat Party.
If you can make so bold a claim that the US Federal Government in 1860 was "leftist" then don't you dare say NatSoc isn't leftist. Pleb.
>>136547712
>winning when discussing REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>136547712
Like that is going to happen
>>136547712
t. angry retard
>>>/tumblr/
>>136551476
We weren't talking about the prussians, don't straw man.
>Once and for all: The leftist origins of National Socialism
http://www.thecommentator.com/article/2827/once_and_for_all_the_leftist_origins_of_national_socialism
>>136548880
With what? The same tired arguments that have been repeated for centuries, but only with a slightly different spin on them?
Leftist, Communist and Socialist talking points don't hold any water. When your system fails, you blame someone or something else, usually a concept that is intangible.
Your pathetic excuse for an ideology has never, and will never work.
Lefties win lying contest. Always
>>136551535
The national socialists weren't exactly anti traditionalist.
I'm not sure if that's what you were getting at.
Lefties win blue hair style contest. Always
>>136551688
>fucking quotes are from jews
>comment section is full of people destroying his shit tier argument
Try again lolbergtard.
>muh national socialism isn't prussian socialism
Are you retarded? Gottfried Feder admitted that the majority of his economic policy was from Oswald Spengler, you know, the inventor of prussian socialism.
Lefties win sympathy with that quivering lip thing. Bonus for adding children angst.
>>136547712
That makes no sense. Our mods are liberals and they do their best to see that this place is destroyed by ignoring reports of black cock and dozens of off-topic bullshit.
>>136547712
Tru dat
Lefties win the Devil's share by default
>>136551535
>>136551881
NatSoc was indeed anti-monarchist. Hitler specifically ordered for members of the Prussian nobility to be imprisoned, and/or for their power and wealth to be seized by the governemnt. He considered Kaiser Wilhelm II to be a "failure" for his actions in WWI. Also, the Nazis suppressed a Bavarian pro-monarchy movement in southern Germany during their rule.
That said, the Nazis were actually very pro-"tradition", in the sense of being pro-German culture. The Nazis gave state funding to nationalist artists and musicians to capture German culture; and they also held festivals, parades, and other public events to promote German culture.
>>136547931
this
>>136552064
Lefties love big black cocks with veins bigger then their little fempenis
>>136551704
>Leftist, Communist and Socialist talking points don't hold any water.
A simple fact that a significant portion of people hold Left-wing views proves otherwise.
>Your pathetic excuse for an ideology has never, and will never work.
It has been working for the last century and is working at this very moment, goy.
>>136551881
>The national socialists weren't exactly anti traditionalist.
They may not have rejected the traditional, homogenous, monogamous Christian lifestyle entirely, but they definitely disregarded the aristocratic reasoning behind such a thing.
When will we get our fucking Monarchist flags Hiroshim00t? I want my fucking flag you fishnigger
this is a right-wing paid board
ironically, all the shilling is made to either make us look like idiots, or to radicalize the youth with outrageous claims
sad to say this, but this board was a lot better when it was filled with libertarians
>>136552103
Lefties cry bully, then claim to win debate. See Senator Richard Blumenthal
>>136552261
>It has been working for the last century
I thought real gommunism never existed.
>>136552353
pic related
>>136552422
>I thought real gommunism never existed.
All confusion exists because there are actually two meanings of this.
One: an ideal and utopic form of society envisioned by Marx that, of course, was never achieved.
Two: a Marxist political ideology, created by Vladimir Lenin, named after communism, which is also its' final goal.
Communism as a utopia has never been tried. Every Communist, however is "real" communist, as he adopts Lenin's ideas.
>>136552369
>sad to say this, but this board was a lot better when it was filled with libertarians
The slower pace made it for longer, more drawn out and thoughtful discussion which ends up being more fun, but I wouldn't say better. You had idealistic Paulbots riding Ron Paul's dick harder than any Trumpbots could ride Trump's.
Happeningfags counting sneezes around the world like the president of Madagascar
"Who would build the roads...?" Threads and to top it off more BBC spam than I had thought possible.
Dorner was the best time I ever had on /pol/ and the m00t trolling us during the Israeli election was funny.
I forgot the JIDF spam in every single thread that was far worse than "SHAREBLUE SAGE SHILL" ever has been
This is my favorite. White male entitled, Ivy league educated decries white male entitlement with a straight face. ((YOU)) MS. Vanderbilt
>>136552512
Hearty chuckle. Good post.
Snow white butterfly boy
sniffing dank black ass, also boy
claims it is right
because he feels it
coming
>>136552579
So are Nazbols not real gommunists, even if they agree with every economic aspect of Marx and Lenin?
Does favoring the existence of a nation-state and ethnocentrism exclude you from the gommie club?
>>136547712
Leftists don't win debates though, they just repeat their rhetoric and ignore our points entirely. We point out crime data or cite things and they just go full ostrich mode.
>>136547712
This. Have a bump.
>>136553009
You don't really know who Nazbols are: Nazbols are a coalition, mostly communists and Red nationalists, and a bit of everyone else.
>Does favoring the existence of a nation-state and ethnocentrism exclude you from the gommie club?
In my opinion - yes. To Nazbols in particular, nation-state and ethnocentrism would be even worse than traitorous liberal scum that collapsed the Soviet Union.
>>136547712
When the mods are under the impression that leftoids have won a debate they keep the thread up for 12 hours
>>136551950
Literally where? Did you even read the article?
Of course you didn't.