google search (((results)))

File: CRP_0301.webm (3MB, 1080x1874px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1080x1874px

>>136540117
like, ok. isn't this the kind of thing that's so blatant, so obvious, so demonstrably ridiculous, that you can show it to a normie and they'll be forced to admit that this is, at the very least, pretty odd?

I know it's hard to sell the idea that liberal institutions are pushing "diversity" stuff for a variety of geopolitical reasons, none of which have reasonable non-elite white westerners' best interests in mind... but I mean, come ON. any web browser with Incognito tabs, two Google queries, and bam, proof that Google is at least actively influencing public opinion through consciously-engineered bias in search algorithms.

pls show this to normies apropos of nothing & report results. genuinely interested in the normie reaction to this phenomenon.

>>136540117
What's worse, the black folk or Edison...
Damn you jewgle

>>136540117
You know the reason for that is the phrase "African American." Try united states inventor.

You never say white americans or caucasian americans but you do say african americans and the word americans matches the results more frequently
The algo is quite simple in that regard

File: '''''''white'''''''''.png (1MB, 1869x846px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1869x846px

>>136541126
>>136541130
Fine, then explain pic related. I just took the cap, and it's still like 3/4 niggers. It even gives a bloody list of niggers.

>>136541729
That's clearly just the Jews.

>>136540117
You think that's bad lol. Google "Blonde braids".

Trigger warning.

>>136540895
more

File: CRP_0302.webm (2MB, 1080x1874px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1874px

>>136541729
ok seriously what the fuck

>>136542469

File: european-people-history_crop.jpg (580KB, 1240x1837px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 1240x1837px

>>136540117
>european people history

>>136540117
when will this stop
the world was great 5 years ago

>>136540117
and the one white guy they showed was a notorious peerage spook.

>>136540117
You guys are fucking retarded and don't get how google fetches results or how search engines even work. You're intentionally creating searches and finding a handful that get borked when inputting certain keywords then convincing yourself it's a conspiracy.

File: Picture1.png (73KB, 675x225px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 675x225px

>>136540117
i'm not so convinced anon, arguably the french are extremely cucked and this is what i got from frog google, 2 negros

going to try sweden now, will report back

File: fullsizeoutput_132.jpg (45KB, 486x275px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 486x275px

>>136540117
>Uses the same picture of a black woman twice

File: le56.png (13KB, 241x263px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 241x263px

>>136540117

>>136540117
Black mother white father
American inventors
German potatoes
Japanese puppets
Chinese rooms
Red herrings
Stupid niggers
Faggot OPs
Southern Comforts
Blue squares

STFU OP!
By predicating what type of shit you want you'll force Google to show you all the stupid shit you dumb goys punch into Google all the time. If you weren't such retards Google wouldn't have such results. You're literally chasing your own dumb tails, ass hat!

>>136544524
>5 years ago
How so?

>>136545483
It's because french people don't search for the same shit that Americans do. Google tries to help retards find what they want, but in certain instances it can backfire.

The primary phenomena here is that in America/English, people don't search for "white ____". White is considered the default. People just type "inventor" if they want to find it.

Black people are treated like special children, and are considered an exception, so people commonly specifically search for "african american inventor", which google then assumes you are looking for when you omit african.

If you want to get exact results, just type "-african" into google at the end of your results. Problem solved, and proof that the problem is that google is assuming you want african american inventors.

Now fuck off with this shit you idiots, and learn basic search engine commands.

>>136545257
still it's fun to spook newfags and if you turn your brain off you can get a shiver or two, search "world's most righteous" and have a good laugh

>>136545600
Well, to their credit, niggers do all look the same.

File: tswiftislam.jpg (112KB, 1024x658px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1024x658px

>>136544212
>>136541729
>>136540117
(((They))) are literally rewriting history. I guess this makes sense though. "History is written by the victors." In our capitalist world, those who are making a fortune are certainly victors, and Google is certainly worth a fortune.

My co-workers (at a tech company in the SF bay area) all have the same reaction when I mention Google's cultural marxist agenda:
>lol private company can do whatever they want!
>smuglibshitface.png
>lmao, isn't it the republicans who love business rights and stuff?
>smuglibshitface.png
>don't like it? don't use google then!
>smuglibshitface.png
>etc.

These "arguments" completely ignore the issue - that Google IS fundamental in the way people communicate and learn, and Google ARE insidiously altering both of these to shape an unsuspecting global user base. They are literally painting a false narrative the is 100% culturally marxist.

This is fucking scary! Sure everyone on /pol/ are smart enough to know these things, but I guarantee you that the VAST majority of people using Google aren't wise to (((their))) tricks.

We (the people who resist cultural marxism) NEED to work in tech (which I do). The current and the future are both controlled by tech. If you let (((them))) run it unchallenged then the future will meet with ruin. These tech companies subversively unhinge the basis of white heritage and power, while at the same time importing shitskins by the thousands cause "lol, not enough Americans with CS degrees."

WE NEED EVERYONE! This, above all else, is our war /pol/. With enough people joining tech, we CAN change this tide. Every tech giant was at first a start up. Oh and you'll make a shit load of money working in tech.

What's your excuse?

>>136545739
woah so what you're saying is that most cultures have already been effectively jewed and that these search results are just an indicator of the damage done while OP is wrongly seeing it as a diversification tactic?

also bro i've been using -pinterest since '11 so calm down with your superiority complex

it's fun to point out stupidity in the jewish conspiracy but it's infinitely funner to larp as a jewish conspirator in order to elicit butthurt from jewish intellectual fags like yourself

>>136546208
>lol I'm merely pretending to be retarded

>>136543312
>>136543312
s a u c e
p l z

>>136545257
Monoculturefag, detected. There is nothing wrong with ideological diversity.

>>136545739
See>>136541729

>>136546364
>le short memey response

infinitely better than your long drawn out superior post from before, keep to this style anon

i suppose you chose to respond to this thread because only idiots would enter it and you could make yourself feel like a worldy intellectual

File: Screenshot_20170808-054351.jpg (351KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 2560x1440px

>>136545601

File: [Pyramid].jpg (22KB, 388x400px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 388x400px

>>136546790
>holy shit saved

krsna where you been? haven't seen you in a while, you still frequent the india hate threads?

>>136546728
>lol don't type paragraphs u fag too long rofl i cant read all that
>stop saying basic common sense stuff lmao u just want to sound smart

You're getting butthurt because the bar here is so low that explaining basic search engine commands and functions is considered complicated. Basically, you're trying to say I'm an asshole because this board is mentally retarded and it makes you feel insecure.

>>136546712
You apparently can't read. Those results get messed up because retards(including you) search for specific things. Racial things are all fucked up because you dumb cucks keep searching for interracial porn, and retarded leftists make everything about race. Which is why when you search for shit like "white inventors", it finds results from pages of lefty fags talking about race and how important the minority inventors are, which is where it pulls the images from. No, it's not some grand conspiracy. It's thanks to Americans being retarded.

>>136546680
No. Google image search literally ANYTHING preceding "white" and "black" and you will see that EVERY SINGLE search for the white version yields black people (often as the first result), meanwhile every search with "black" yields results of all black people.

>>136547152
Okay, so there is still a concerted effort to erase white history, and the search results are real and will result in a skewed version of history being shown to everyone.
I have never once searched for cuck porn, also. I rarely even bother googling racial crap for this very reason, and I doubt many anons give these websites pageviews.

>American inventors
>Alexander Graham Bell

File: Screenshot_20170808-060619.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

>>136547100

>>136546051
lol some software monkey with literally 0 influence and who does what his SJW managers tell him to thinks hes rallying a resistance

>>136547370
Because nobody searches for "white ____", white people are the fucking default. All the top results for that shit are related to minorities in relation to white people, which is why the results are skewed.

Google doesn't shit images out of its ass, it pulls them from popular search results relating to the terms you used. It's not deliberate. Unless you're insinuating that google WANTS the result "white criminals" to have a whole bunch of niggers on the page?

>>136540895
no its just nigs are pandered to to boost their self esteem, so they are taught the great feats of their people, just like we used to do for white children.
probably 10s of Huffpo/Slate tier writers making lists of great (African) American inventors. The only lists of just "american inventors" will just be nerdy kids who like lists

>>136546051
How should I get into tech? I've been wanting to get out of security for a while and it seems like the most reasonable heading for this ship to sail.

>>136547466
>Okay, so there is still a concerted effort to erase white history

No. Pay attention.

File: Untitled.png (442KB, 1660x590px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 1660x590px

Umm, y'all trying to say that this is because of "african american" being returned as "american"...are you missing the
>Inventors> United States
category on the top?

File: 1501740831045.jpg (46KB, 641x530px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 641x530px

>>136540117
>mfw one of the black inventors has my last name

>>136546051
>lol private company can do whatever they want!
They probably also think that bakeries should be forced to bake cakes for faggots.

>>136547699
Yes, you just fucking said so, and I never claimed that Jewgle was deliberately putting these things up there--although that wouldn't surprise me, given what they've done to Jewtube.
The leftists keep shitting out anti-white propaganda, and their circlejerking rockets it up to the top, drowning out actual whites. Eat a dick.

>>136547765
Type -african at the end, idiot.

>>136547821
your family might have owned him!
great great grandpappy might have bought a clever one! maybe the nig was smart enough make farming more efficient for the plantation, making your family more wealthy!

>>136547891
>Yes, you just fucking said so

No, I didn't. Learn to fucking read, moron. There is no deliberate effort to "erase white history", not even by these leftist retards. They don't intentionally game google, they don't control how the search engine works, and google is not intentionally sabotaging your precious white history. I know you want to feel persecuted over this, but there's nothing to get your bitch tits all riled up for. I assure you, if people want to find articles on famous american inventors that also happen to be white, they can do so.

>>136547370
>Google image search literally ANYTHING preceding "white" and "black"

I found an exception! Search for "white criminal" and "black criminal".

>>136547982
True. Many slaves took the name of their owners.
Now think about how many blacks are named Clinton.
And how many Trump?

File: white american couple.jpg (89KB, 1389x382px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1389x382px

>>136540989
>>136541126
Googles version of a "White American Couple"

Pretty sure the person who wrote the algorithm is from Argentina.

File: senegal the frog.jpg (417KB, 1104x1292px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 1104x1292px

>>136547982
>mfw the wealth is gone now

Oh well, I suppose the "Great times create weak people" saying is true

>>136547612
"White criminal" is one of the whitest search results I've seen yet. That just proves my point. If you think Google can't program their search results to promote or restrict certain things then you're dumb. Just take a moment to plug away different pairings. It's completely fucking obvious.

>>136547670
Get a degree in computer science. There are job opportunities for days with just that. Start ups in tech are also very common. With more of us in this industry we're more likely to find allies with whom we can build something new with.

>>136547855
They fucking are.

>>136548116
This.

>>136548095
>time to redefine what it means to be X articles
>BBC puts niggers in Roman Britain
>multiple PMs have stated their countries have no culture
>lol there's no effort to erase white history hehe look at me I'm so above it all
Take a bullet, you insufferable piece of shit.

>>136547895
And if you want to remove spaced stuff like "People of color", what do you type?

>>136548095
I dont want a biased search for a diverse result. I want a good sesrch engine to put the most famous/influental inventors on top. Im not interested in the inventor of the kfc bucket because he happen to be black

File: Untitled.png (172KB, 1309x582px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1309x582px

>>136547895
The image bar disappears entirely. Not exactly what you're trying to imply would happen, is it?

>>136548271
None of which has fucking anything to do with these google search results, retard. Fuck off, you dumb professional victim cunt.

>>136548295
How about -"people of colo*" ?
Seriously, have you ever used a search engine?

>>136540117
Is that a black George Washington?

It's because of the word American. It's often paired with 'african american' - which is why it shows niggers first. And also why it doesn't show in spanish, because they don't call niggers 'african americans'

>>136548463
>moving the goalposts
That's not the issue. Regardless of whether Jewgle does this intentionally, or if leftists bump these kids of things to the top, there is an obvious and pervasive effort to destroy what it means to be white.
I'm not a "professional victim," you faggot.

I think you just can't admit you are a condescending prick, and now you're doubling down to avoid looking like an ass. Just go to a bait thread, or maybe /lit/ so you can be surrounded by your own kind of deluded narcissists.

Use "quotations" to search for the exact phrase

>>136548295

-people or -color. Of isn't necessary, since it's a common word. Could probably just get away with -color.

>>136548370
You are the derpiest of derps. That bar is for super common searches, and it's auto-generated. If you complicate your search, it won't be there.

Anyways, this thread was a retarded waste of time and it's time to do something else. If you want to blame your jewish boogeymen all night for a mundane phenomena, go for it.

>>136548762
False. See >>136544212

File: Screenshot_2017-08-08-10-52-02-805_com.android.chrome.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

>>136542469
OK seriously wtf

>>136548762
see
>>136548370
No, no it's not.

Also, are you seriously claiming that with all of the predictive algorithms and abstract leaps that that search engine is capable of, no one has once thought to parse "african american" differently from "american"?

>>136548762
oh vey it's a pure coincidence goym

File: CRP_0304.webm (2MB, 1080x1874px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1874px

>>136547618
the question though, is why do they pander?
do they think they're helping black people? or are they trying to brainwash white people? both? neither? what's their stated or implied reason, and what's their true reason?

>>136546509

File: blackdoctors.jpg (142KB, 1337x656px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1337x656px

>>136549158

>>136545601
so is this the new meme number we are going with now?

File: 1499882885013.png (175KB, 1313x1248px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1313x1248px

>>136541729
God you guys have the fucking combined IQ of a turtle. It shows black inventors when you type specifically white inventors because those are the images attached to articles that are more likely to use the word "white inventors" as a comparative. Articles about Tesla aren't gonna be like "he was a white inventor" because it's redundant. Fucking get it together /pol/

>>136540117
I sent them a nasty feedback letter about this search. Fuck them and Fuck Google.

File: Untitled.png (55KB, 1195x479px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1195x479px

>>136548865
>You are the derpiest of derps. That bar is for super common searches, and it's auto-generated. If you complicate your search, it won't be there.
Sure thing, it's a matter of the search being "more complicated"

>>136549158
>>136549200
Again. Blacks are stereotypically unrepresented so they're gonna have articles about it. People assume white to be the base state of humanity so nobody's going "hurr durr look at this beautiful white doctor! white doctor representation!"
it just isn't how people talk, so it's gonna show up differently on search engines.

File: Untitled.png (646KB, 1749x580px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 1749x580px

>>136549374
>>136548926

>>136548865
Can't hang with the big boys huh? Need to go back to your safe space and tell zir about your foray into trolling the ebil alt right?

>>136549165
>cultural marxism
If you're asking those questions then you clearly don't understand what the above concept is.

>>136549233
How many times do I have to say that this isn't the issue. It's that anything about actual inventors is BURIED under swathes of leftist propaganda.

File: Meghalaya-29.jpg (510KB, 1917x1076px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1917x1076px

>>136549222

>>136548529
>>136548865
Tried it and it didn't work. I still see plenty of niggers in results.

>>136549233
That literally makes no sense because you don't see inventors from any other race except niggers

>>136549165
On cultural marxism...

https://youtu.be/G8pPbrbJJQs

https://youtu.be/wLoG9zBvvLQ

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1877x811px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1877x811px

And just to rub in that those of you who are claiming it's simply because of "african american", who somehow forget how much backend work is done to give you the results they want, look at this search.

>>136548899
"European people history" gets cross referenced with european people of color history. This isn't this first of these threads and they are always slide threads. if you want to hit google where it hurts go here
>>136542735

>>136550045
Come on guy. If google can keep actual tits out of a search with safesearch off, then why can't they parse african american differently from american?

Also, pic related

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 1882x759px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1882x759px

>>136551511
whoops, didn't attach the image

>>136540117
Now google 'are jews evil' along with 'are (any other race) evil' and see if you can find any discrepancies.

File: 1496292198296.jpg (43KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 720x720px

>>136540117

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1872x750px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1872x750px

>>136551549
>>136551511
>>136550045
Because the vast majority of uses of the word "cock" in images on the internet are referring to a male chicken.

>>136545600
HAHAHA

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1878x802px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1878x802px

>>136551771
and of course...

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 1879x787px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1879x787px

>>136551972

You guys are fucking retarded, just type in "US inventors" and you'll get normal results. Granted, two or three niggers show up, but the rest are white and that's to be expected from this mongrel nation.

>>136552551
cuck

File: FOTO20020040730054851.jpg (10KB, 250x159px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 250x159px

>>136552551
At least you are honest about it.

File: blondeshavemorefun.gif (2MB, 245x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x300px

>>136542469
>>136543312
>>136548902

>>136542469
its because nigresses post dozens of pictures a day of their face and body only, while hash-tagging dozens of words that could ever possibly relate to their picture for more followers on Instagram. now that picture is forever linked through image searches until deleted.
its not even googles fault for that i think, its just niggers being niggers.

Best way to take back the internet (in the case of the blonde braids) is to create a bunch of accounts and post images of white women with actual blonde braids and put hashtags relating to the picture. Eventually it should show up on google searches.

>>136552551
So magically in this one instance, Google decides not to treat "American" and "US" as synonyms.

Fuck me, y'all really have no clue how google's algorithms work, do you? If it were a simple frequency count of links, anyone could replicate it. The biggest problem would be actually trolling the web to build your database and keeping it updated. Google abandoned this philosophy a long damn time ago and started attempting to parse what a searcher means when they enter a search phrase and give you results based off of what you mean, not what you say. This is intentional. It's not a side-effect of a search ranking algorithm that hasn't been used in like a decade.

>>136545600
Tesla got blacked.

>>136546051
We are rewritting it too, with the (((captcha))).

Write the following in seach
'My success with'

See what it auto fills for you.

>>136552551
That is not true there were like 4 or 5 blacks out of 10 inventors. Blacks did not invent anything so they should not even be there.

>>136541729
>serb
>white

ok jewlge wtf

>>136540117
Holy fuck José, I get the same results. I thought you were bullshitting me. Google have officially gone full retard.

Why does google do this? That's what I wonder

>>136548132
>Implying the Trump family owned slaves
Uhhh, the Trump family emigrated from Bremen, Germany to the United States in 1885, hence, there would be no slaves named "Dahnyela Trump" or "Shequeefa Trump" etc.

>>136541729

>'Nice clock Ahmed'
>Inventor

Up to this day that story still pisses me off, seeing the whole world fall into an obvious scam by a kid, that day I took a huge red pill, made me realise most people is literally retarded.

>>136540895
I wish we had a non-asian 4channel (even chan sounds asian *plegh)

>>136545694
Nice work thanks for that

>>136540117
Fucking newfag, we already saw this more than a year ago.
Fuck off back to t_D.

File: IMG_6651.jpg (331KB, 1125x1912px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1125x1912px

>>136548171
Typed in "white European art" and got pic related
>mfw

File: 1493667065578.png (760KB, 760x839px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 760x839px

>>136554902
they're not retarded (well, not all of them)—they've been programmed such that the Narrative being presented to them is seen as Righteous and Good, and that anyone questioning it is Evil and Bad. this is programmed as an EMOTIONAL RESPONSE that overrides any logical processing—many of the smartest (i.e. male and white) computer programmer friends of mine are beta faggots that love signalling how much they love the Narrative and adhering to it and being the irredeemable villain in it.

I could rant about why at length but the tl;dr version is, we haven't evolved to handle the gravity of the paradigm shift that is the Internet—physically, emotionally, psychologically, sociologically, etc. We still have tailbones, and our brains are designed to handle knowledge of the existence of a very small number of other intelligent humanoids, proportional to the total Internet-reachable population of the planet Earth. We've adapted, both genetically and sociologically, to coexist in groups of people that are absolutely tiny compared to the populations of major metropolitan areas of the world... yet we now have the entire population of the Internet at our fingertips.

so, in this crazy world, built upon political machinations beyond the wildest dreams of the average citizen, people will gladly accept any Narrative that makes them FEEL, and that's exactly what happened. some poor widdle brown boy genius inventor that big mean racist white Republican Texas racistly accused of making a bomb, like a terrorist, when it was really a cool clock that he built all by himself because he's so smart. this Narrative makes people feel GOOD about feeling OUTRAGED about. this is for many reasons, most of which are specific to the white European race, genetically and sociologically. these factors are being actively exploited by (((higher powers))), with Stories that fit the Narrative like this one.

when you see the scope of it all from the mountaintop, it is a truly awesome sight.