I have figured out the NatSoc vs Capitalism funda.

File: natsoc.jpg (113KB, 620x880px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 620x880px

NatSoc is best for ethnically homogeneous countries. Capitalism is best for mixed societies until they become a homogeneous country.

I've given this a lot of thought and yes - NatSoc is objectively the better system for society than Capitalism. I prefer a system based on protecting the poor. However, I would only feel comfortable doing this when I know the people I'm helping with my taxed dollars are actually capable people, momentarily out of the work force who will be returning to it shortly. This goes out of the window in mixed societies like USA - where huge IQ gaps exist between races (whites vs blacks). Forcing socialism in a country like USA will only ensure whites keep paying for the inferior races who will for perpetuity be on gibsmedats.

Hitler was right for wanting NatSoc for 99% white Germany, but so is right wing capitalism for 50% white+ 5% Asians (who work) the rest who only live for gibsmedats.

I am right, and you will affirm that I am right.