/pol/, Hitler's art is objectively good. We wouldn't even recognise it (generally speaking). Will the goyim?
Change your cover photos, post his art, spread it. They won't know, we'll enjoy it, they will too. Redpilling needs a catalyst, and here Is the most subtle one we could ever pull off.
If I was on social media, I'd probably do this
he couldn't draw people though because he was a soulless monster wearing a human skin
>>136501301
Well basically this, his teachers recommended he pursue a career in architecture because he avoided drawing people.
It's amazing how he got rejected from art school.
Makes me wonder who else got rejected from a modern day institution and instead is posting on here fulfilling a completely different career because of idiot leftists who don't have the slightest clue on what they're doing to us.
>>136501471
I would guess zero
>>136501301
Hitler was good at drawing people, for an amateur. He didn't have a good grasp of bone structure or hands, which are difficult things that take people years to learn, and which was why people enroll in art school in the first place.
>>136501471
No, the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts has traditionally been a very conservative institution. Youre just unqualified for whatever University rejected you.
Poo in the loo
>>136500650
Is there one I could turn into a Christmas card?
In all seriousness everybody should do this
>>136502522
I'll bump
>>136502744
That's not his work btw. I just like the photo.
>>136501301
I can only draw humans. Some artists have their friends do the hard parts and they tell no one.
>>136502087
>very conservative
Did you see the "art" that was coming out of this institution at the time?