I'm at odds pol.
I'm really getting into Peterson's talks and lectures but on the other hand I feel like I am also a national socialist. How do you reconcile the two? Peterson's ideology seems smart and straight to the point, I don't want to be ruled by a tyrant, but national socialism inspires me.
>>136375200
>How do you reconcile the two?
His views aren't irreconcilable with Nat Soc, I'd actually go so far as to say they're not only compatible, but augment the validity of fascist philosophy. Peterson's best work in my opinion is in regards to Dominance Hierarchies and archetypal interpretations. He actually manages to manifest these ideas as Darwinian as opposed to the "social construct" title that has been so popular as late.
>>136375200
>I don't want to be ruled by a tyrant, but tyranny me.
>>136375200
>I feel like I am also a national socialist.
assuming you're white and actually intelligent, this won't last. don't worry about it.
>>136377478
*tyranny inspires me
you get the point
Also, his vocal opposition to reactionary movements, Nat Soc, WN, etc are do to the overwhelming evidence that an immense amount of suffering will have to transpire to achieve any semblance of the goal. If you were to really sit down with him and review the demographic decline, IQ heritability, block voting patterns among ethnic lines, the history of Rhodesia and the current state of South Africa, and explain that turning the tides in the future will be impossible, I think he would be much more forgiving.
The reason these ideologies have poped up out of nowhere is out of necessity. It isn't a coincidence and there's not another alternative.