Brit/pol/: Bring it on European Army edition

File: church.png (928KB, 786x630px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 786x630px

Start going to church.

File: tripmongs.jpg (47KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 720x960px

Last night was the worst comfy hours ever.

File: For_ReadingUpdate3.png (287KB, 1048x828px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1048x828px

Eventually I'm going to change the format back to normal or somebody else is.

Bomber Rimmer has been hospitalised for eating a coffee machine.

Lads throw out what every single book on course on English law has ever told you, we're a civil law nation now.

File: bowden.jpg (6KB, 198x255px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 198x255px

>>136364174
no

File: CornwallIsNotEngland.jpg (57KB, 671x661px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 671x661px

>no qt cornish nationalist gf

anyone else think the Belfast accent is sexy as fuck ?

>Da Kween nevur dun it befaw, sew it carnt 'appen!

t. Eddie

>>136364589
Is it like Scottish nationalism or Irish nationalism ?

>>136364635
>Da Kween nevur dun it befaw, sew it carnt 'appen!

t. Precedence

>>136364635
I know right! Why does everyone keep talking about presidents Kek we have a prime minister idiots lol.

How shit would an EU army be?

>>136364711
>t. Precedence

Why should she obey it?

>>136364748
It'd be awesome because we Napoleonic state now. I fucking love civil law.

>>136364748
Better than a British army anyway cum boy

>>136364748
What did you have for dinner Kevin?

>>136364830
It's not that she should or shouldn't, it's that she will and you're wrong and now LARPing.

>>136364635
Will get civil war 2 if the queen starts poking around in politics

>>136364830
I know right! It's not as if it's the entire basis of English law since 1066.

>>136364830
What do *you* actually think would happen if she did not appoint a new prime minister after a general election and instead made some right wing nationalist one instead? Despite the fact this would obviously never fucking happen, what do you think would happen? You think she would last long do you?

>>136364903
>it's that she will

Just because she will, doesn't mean she should! She's not obligated to obey precedence.

>>136364980
Parliament would overrule her, forcing her to step down, as they are sovereign

>>136364980
No, but there's no law against her doing it.

>>136364548

We are being replaced, but it's not by beautiful trees that are coming out of the ground.

>>136365037
That's you LARPing versus us telling you how it is. This has gone on for 3-4 hours now, and you've been wrong so many times its ridiculous.

>>136364635
Be careful, he'll make that tired point about the Diana flag before long. He loves to crowbar that into any argument he's losing (which is all of them, as thick as pigshit as he is).

>>136365077
I didn't say there was a law against her doing it, I asked what you think would actually happen in reality?

File: IMG_4819.jpg (320KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 1920x1080px

Hey lads

File: 1466364581578.jpg (115KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 960x720px

>mfw we will get to actually fight people on the continent again
>Dunkirk was just all one big rallying call

>>136365110
I've been right. All along I've said she should have spoken out.

Then you say, "but she won't", which means nothing to me. I know she won't, she's too frightened, that's not the point

>>136365115
>the sky is green
>>No it's not, look up
>Oh that same tired point
You can't just dismiss a point that BTFOs you every single time because I use it to BTFO you every single time. Also it's not relevant here.

>>136365158
Obviously she'd be deposed. Doesn't mean she couldn't do it.

>>136365158
What did you have for dinner, Kevin?

File: 1501109770550.png (886KB, 600x782px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 600x782px

>>136365174

>>136365348
Seems to me like they broke precedence there.

>Eddie BTFOing himself again

>>136365320
You've changed your point in your attempts to be right so many times that you've probably deluded yourself into thinking that, but you must feel, at the very least, humiliated or educated seeing as how wrong you've been over the last 3 hours. And I took a break for an hour inbetween.

>>136365352
If she seized total power and gets deposed, how the fuck has she seized total power?
Christ you're thick as fuck.

how good would it be to be raped in the bum ?
Obv consensual
But like kinky pretend rape with an older guy y'know ?

>>136364687
Yep, commie infested.

>>136365452
Get some of the good stuff in you

Anyone read A Brief History of Crime? Rightly? I'm kind of intrigued but I'm tempted to just get Abolition of Britain.

>>136365293

Dunkirk was such a badly timed film... this nonsense about British exceptionalism. Britain has been struggling to find it's place in the world for a long time now and it's only going to get more isolated after Brexit. The size of the uneducated ignorant underclass in this country is a fucking millstone around it's neck, it's honestly embarrassing, and it's going to drag us down.

>>136365463
Not really, my point was consistent from the beginning, and the fact is Eddie and his anonymous friend have been wrong, over and over again.

Part of me thinks they've just missed the point I was trying to make.

Earlier, Rightly So was having another argument that he was losing, about Hitchens I think it was, and he said something about how not even YKTD always agreed with him.

How brain damaged must you be to hold up cunting YKTD as some yardstick with which all logic must be compared to? What grown man appeals to some stranger he will never meet as some wisened sage?

He's not worthy of anyone's time.

>>136365613
>Eddie

I've been here a few years now and I've come back from a break

Give me your trip backstory and it better be better than Rimmer and YKTD

Also that's a meme. French leaked documents say they favour us over the fourth reich

>>136365478
>Implying they'd let her do it

You're a special kind of retarded lad.

>>136365613
>British exceptionalism
>a film about running away while the Luftwaffe take some potshots
Bit of a stretch.

>>136365742
Yeah I saw that, him and Eddie got embarrassed.

>>136365597
I started to "read" Strange Death of Europe in audiobook form instead, obviously, it is going to be written from a civic perspective, but he makes up for it in his well backed up assertions that people from different countries bring in different cultures, and that it is not possible for those cultures to harmoniously run in parallel. The two standout bits of the book so far are his demolishing of the mantras that migration is a net financial benefit to the country, and that we are a nation of migrants. Also deals rather well the "we need more migrants because they make more children and we need that for our pyramid scheme" argument.

If it's a choice between A Brief History of Crime and Abolition of Britain for your first Hitchens book then AoB will probably give you a much better foundation.

>>136365714
I am that "Anonymous friend" and yes, I did miss your point, we've been over this. You were making the point that the Queen should have an opinion, she already can do this so I assumed Assent, quite quickly we established you didn't know what you meant since the only way you could define it was by adding the words "strongly" or "forcefully" to it - which she can't do, because of precedence.

>>136365065

Parliament cannot overule the monarch.

>>136365158


If parliament didn't accept her decision It'd be civil war.

>>136365760
I want to beleive you're an incredibly dedicated troll, but something tells me you genuinely beleive you're right with no actual understanding of the subject other than "WOT I FINK".

Presumably, because there's no precedent for it, the Queen also couldn't parade around in neon green spandex, right?

After all, it's never been done before!

People don't fucking get that the Queen doesn't have to follow this shit!

One Eddie was bad enough...

File: 1501105251867.jpg (21KB, 440x440px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 440x440px

>He thinks Parliament can overrule the monarch

>>136365850
>she can't do because of precedence

But WHY? Why does precedence stop her doing it?

>>136365460
>Seems to me like they broke precedence there.
>Eddie BTFOing himself again

Ooof, look at this one Eddie mate, you didn't reply to it so I assume you missed it, but he's made you look like a right stupid twat.

>>136365909
In matters not classed as royal Perogative, for example constitutionally transformative matters (recently reinforced by the parliamentary vote on brexit despite executive opposition), Parliament absolutely can overrule the monarch you ignorant cunt.

>>136365742
I said "Even YKTD didn't agree with him about everything" in response to >>136332340 , the implication being in that post that it wasn't possible or was hypocritical to have a favourite author that you disagreed with on points, so my response was appropriate given that YKTD was one of his biggest fans here.

>>136366048
This is again where the whole argument stems from. You don't know what the fuck precedence is.

>>136365742
YKTD was the spirit of this general
Ever since he left we've been on a downward decline whether you like it or not

he spent a ridiculous amount of his time and energy here, and came across as pretty intelligent
Probably due to practicing arguing politics for >10 hours a day for months at a time
Anyway I think it's fair to compare yourself to him, as no trip has come close to him since

T.yktd

File: 4e3.jpg (8KB, 250x242px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x242px

Who /drunk/ on Sunday?

>>136366130
But what did you have for dinner though?

>>136365501
Depends on whether you're gay or not

File: itsgood.gif (1MB, 219x186px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 219x186px

>>136366168

Get yourself together, no one is impressed that you imbibed alch

>>136366138
Its the following of principles derived from prior judgements that are applicale to the case at hand.

Or it's convention, if you believe Eddie.

>>136366304
You not understand English doesn't prove your point.

>>136365839
Cheers chinky knock-off YKTD.

>>136365839
Kek. Trip nonces can't even read

How fucking pathetic are they ?
It's honestly entertaining just watching the average trip in his daily posting
He has no idea how sad he looks to outsiders

Just like a chimp in a zoo wanking himself off, in every way
And no more evolved

>>136366390
>Precedent in the legal sense

>Precedent in the common sense

Also, get on my Diana point you nonce.

Lowering the flag wasn't precedented, was it?

>>136366168
Not yet, just grabbed a 10 pack of pint sized Carlings though
So excited to get mortal

File: animenonce.jpg (618KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 1920x1080px

Who killed off the tripcunts? Was it pic related or just the tripcunts themselves?

>>136366483
Because it was forced by the media via the electorate, who by parliamentary representatives are sovereign.
Parliament overrules precedent, you really are completely ignorant on this entire subject aren't you.

>>136366103

lol you fucking idiot, if article 50 requires an act of parliament to initiate then it requires the fucking monarchs asscent-- which it can refuse to give.

the recent high court battle was one of not allowing HMG just simply riding roughshod over parliament, not parliament assuming superiority over the monarch.

>>136365975
She feasibly couldn't, there are countless barriers to her doing that and if she somehow did it anyway it would throw up a huge question about her mental state and legitimacy.

>>136366542
>>136366542
What happened with this guy ? I remember when he started posting, but I didn't see how it developed ?
People have been referencing it and I feel left out

Just bring back honk and the anime nonces st this point. I'd rather their shit posting over trip cunts arguing over nothing and ruining thread after fucking thread the absolute autistic twats.

>>136366688
The monarch doesn't sign royal assent you tit.

>>136366782
At this point I think they're trolling tbqh

>>136366657
>via the electorate

There wasn't a vote on lowering the flag.

>Parliament overrules precedent

So what happens if the Queen breaks precedent by voicing her opinion? Does parliament overrule her opinion, kek?

>>136366722
Yosuke was a one-day ironic tripcunt, every single tripfag hated him but his contribution to killing off the tripfags was immense. He accelerated the hate towards Eddie and everyone else ruining Brit/pol/. Look at the tripfags before and after when he dropped by, far more infighting and strife.

File: 1438106589305.jpg (5KB, 171x158px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 171x158px

>>136366168
>tfw open your pouch of baccy and see you don't have enough to make a fag

suffering

>>136365501
You are a sick fuck. Three years ago, I was bummed by a man like you. It ruined my life. I'm still broken, no matter what I do to try and fix it. I can't move on. The scars run too deep. You don't even care about how those girls are affected. You don't care that you're breaking their spirits, dreams, and everything they hoped to be. My joy in life was taken away, stolen by someone like you. You don't deserve to live for the pain you caused those girls.

>>136366724
Agreed lad
Feels/ blog posting> weird anime child molesters> autistic narcissistic manchildren trying to carve an identity out where no one cares who they are

>>136366835
I hope so, but I genuinely think the post below you beleives what he's saying.

>>136366993
Just recycle the tab ends, mate

File: 1501831782938.jpg (8KB, 126x126px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 126x126px

>>136367029
Blame the tripcunts for driving Honk away. He was practically the only happy person here and those pricks had to go spoil it and call him a nonce.

>>136366724
>>136367029
>debate about precedent and English Common law
>on a british poltical general
>Waaaaah
If you don't understand the operation of your state, why the fuck are you here?

>>136367042
Oh I do, and I'm 100% right. Or at least, you've written nothing persuasive that doesn't just say

>She's never done it before, so I guess she can't

Go ahead and give me a quick rundown on what happens to her if she voices her opinion.

>>136366782

never said the did, you absolute waster. the point still stands-- parliament does not overrule the monarch.

>>136367187
>driving Honk away
He was posting early this morning. Claiming he wasn't coming back, mind

>>136367301
It does though, especially considering the executive is also a memeber of parliament.

The commercialisation of space travel can only be delayed so long - under the current system at least - and what happens after that will be very interesting. It's hard to see how a breakaway group of ethnically homogeneous (and enshrined so) 'civilisations' or whatever you want to label them as, will not immediately begin gaining ground on the mixed 'nations' left on Earth.

This is beyond our life-spans, of course, but so long as there is a significant body of English people on this planet for the next century or two, independent 'colonies' will be feasible and will happen.

File: 1473610267563.png (105KB, 320x287px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 320x287px

>>136364500

>>136367222
I'm a successful lawyer desu
Just come here to laugh at you faggots wasting away your lives bickering, and attempting to form friendships with people you'll never meet

It's funny because you're so unselfaware

"wtf is law"
- this thread

>>136366161

He secretly wanted us to remain in the EU. He passionately and irrationally hated Nigel Farage, claiming it was because Nige somehow didn't care about the UK and had no investment in the brexit.

>>136366993
Quit. It's my first day without cigarettes today. Join me.

>>136367359
All he did was post anime pictures, say hello to people and pat Irish men on the head
Not really a loss

>>136367431
am I right or is Eddie?

Eddie says:

"the Queen cannot voice an opinion because precedent"

I say:

"She is within the law to do so"

>>136367526
You are.
Eddie has no idea what he's talking about.

>>136367526
You were asking why the Queen can't voice an opinion. I said she could. When you implied Royal Assent, I explained why she couldn't, from then on you only described these opinions as "forceful" or "strong" or implied she should force them upon parliament, which is something she can't do.

>>136367526
Your goal posts are so mobile that you've ever started to move mine as well.

File: IMG_0221.png (54KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 420x420px

>>136367628
Thanks lad. I'll sign off now.

>>136367628
You haven't even followed this. The guy you're (You)'ing is the most idiotic fuck this thread has seen since the animenonces raided. m

>>136367526

You really are an idiotic anonymouse with nothing backing up your claims.

>>136367684
>believing he's a lawyer

>>136367638
Actually I never implied royal assent, nor the forcing of opinions upon MPs.

I said, "the Queen can say she does/doesn't like a piece of legislation".

>>136367526
The Queen cannot voice an opinion because of cowardice.

I'm a monarchist, but I'm really starting to despise our royal family.

>>136367029
>narcissistic manchildren trying to carve an identity out

Do you know why they do that? Validation seeking. They want to be approved of and respected and held in high regard, but in so doing they will forever be looked down upon. They don't understand.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt1umirFdY4&t=3s

Can we just get nuked already? Scotland is too far gone

>>136367786
And I said she could dissolve or prorogue parliament tomorrow and fire the Prime Minister, but she isn't going to do it.

>>136364748
How would communications work. How many people would be able to work alongside nationalities they dislike. How many regular soldiers are committed enough to the European Project to fight and die for it.

File: gfdjfja.jpg (51KB, 589x390px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 589x390px

AHAHAHHAHAHHA

http://www.grammar-monster.com/easily_confused/precedence_precedent.htm

This seems important.

>>136367838
Okay?

>Voicing an opinion

>Dissolving parliament

One of these things is not like the other

File: 1497579041593.jpg (309KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 675x900px

>>136366161

>>136367871

One has to wonder the excuse these people will default to when it all comes crashing down around them, as it will, within the next 20 years.

>>136367928
Neither was comparing the Queen blowing her nose in a red handkerchief over a white one but today has been filled with shit analogies. Precedence dictates a monarch won't do either.

>>136367380

they're there as ministers, all ministers sit below the monarch. you really shouldn't tripfag on a birt/pol/ if you know absolutely nothing about the basic way the British political system is structured.

>>136367518
goodluck lad

>>136367973
Get Strange Death of Europe, it talks about racial demographic projections and history, you'd like it.

>>136367187
I think hes pretty down atm

>>136368036
Parliament is sovereign.

>>136368026
>Dictates

How does it?

At best it suggests.

It also doesn't say what a Monarch should do, or ought to do. It says what they're likely to do, which I don't care about.

File: 23397176583_ab10cfe2af_b.jpg (261KB, 862x1024px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 862x1024px

>>136367405

>>136367871
Was just business for the Dutch

>Make colony in Indonesia
>We don't care what you do but the spice must flow, and we get first dip.

File: DAh9PHnWAAUba5O.jpg (125KB, 925x1076px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 925x1076px

>>136367871

>>136368136
Again, you don't understand what precedence is which is where this all stems from.

>>136366724
>>136367029
Yeah shitposting about homosexuality and anime is preferable to people discussing British legal and political history isn't it.

>>136368129

no. the crown in parliament is sovereign.

>>136368044
Thanks mate.

>>136368251
We're just going around in circles. This is ridiculous. You're wrong and it hurts for you too much to admit it so you've changed your point over the course of 5 hours to sound less ridiculous.

>>136367405
Chelsea are shit

>>136368310
>>136368136

File: gfjhsgk.jpg (11KB, 588x124px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 588x124px

>>136367973
They'll just emigrate and become parasites somewhere else. Fuck me the Economist is a rag.

>>136367813
probably cant even nuke ourselves, trident likely broken down desu

>>136368120

Have it, intend on reading it after I finish this:

https://www.abebooks.co.uk/book-search/title/reward-secondary-signed/author/maclean-james-macleane-lauchlin/

>>136368297
Which is held by the executive and only applies to royal Perogative which does not cover constitutionally transformative matters.

>>136368251
You haven't yet explain why it dictates anything.

I understand precedence in every sense except the one you're invoking. How on earth does it prevent the Queen from doing something just because no other Monarch has before?

If the Queen went bungee jumping, wouldn't she be going against precedence then too?

>>136368120
What are you having for dinner?

>>136368451
Anonymongs, same as breakfast.

>>136368310
I haven't changed my point once. Go back and check if you like.

My point was, and is, the Queen should voice her opinion more forcefully.

>>136368413
>How on earth does it prevent the Queen from doing something just because no other Monarch has before?
It doesn't legally, in the same sense judges are bound to stare stare decisis, but precedence is the reason it will not happen in our lifetime. You realize you're arguing reality (what I'm saying) over your made-up world in which Monarchs act as 20th century Dictators?

>>136368451
I wonder if he will tell you that. He wouldn't tell me about today's dinner at all.

>>136368341

There won't be anywhere else, aside from Eastern Europe - and these nations will be able to look at the situation that awaits them should they 'embrace' diversity and shun it. They increasingly do.

There isn't going to be a safe, white haven in the West.

>>136368451
>why don't people like us, we just talk about politics

All I'd expect from a cringey white nationalist

>>136368575
Poland looks like it might last longer than most.

>>136368662
Poland is a meme.

>>136368526
>It doesn't legally

FUCKING FINALLY

I'm arguing about what the Queen should do, not what she will do. I'm saying she SHOULD HAVE voiced her opinion more, and SHOULD do so.

I say this because there is NOTHING preventing her other than convention and fear.

File: 1502037388719.jpg (1MB, 2988x5312px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2988x5312px

Lads, just bought a new flat. Is this brit/pol approved so far?

#justlondonthings

https://youtu.be/EWv2F6773ow

>>136368251
What do you think it is? I'm confused honestly.

>>136368735
>I say this because there is NOTHING preventing her other than convention and fear.
Again, not understanding what precedence is and why it's important, you resort to theorising to explain your utterly retarded point that the Queen should "forcefully or strongly" exert her points.

>>136368212
What's the source of this quote

>>136368742
Looks nice.

>>136368742
nice sofa lad, whats your rent like??

>>136368820
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent
Start here, don't be like the other guy.

>>136368742
>completely blank except for a TV
Did Orwell design it?

>>136368735
The Queen's a woman, and women don't have opinions save for sexual lust and emotions.

>>136368838
>Not understanding what precedence is

You literally just said it was nothing more than convention, more or less.

If it's not based on a judicial decision, how is it NOT mere convention?

What's the worst that can happen if she voiced her opinion strongly?

I haven't sat on a sofa in 12 years.

File: polish-mudshark-2-618x697.jpg (45KB, 618x697px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 618x697px

>>136368662
>>136368724
Daily reminder what happens when you let polish women move to Croydon

>>136368742
Comfy

>>136368742
Too pale, paint it brown and black.

>>136368980
No, how the hell could I undermine its importance, when our unbalanced constitutional system is a direct result of these powers being undermined, largely through tradition and precedence?

Again, to go over the Queen's (theoretical) legal powers.

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmpubadm/422/42204.htm

>. The Queen's constitutional prerogatives are the personal discretionary powers which remain in the Sovereign's hands. They include the rights to advise, encourage and warn Ministers in private; to appoint the Prime Minister and other Ministers; to assent to legislation; to prorogue or to dissolve Parliament; and (in grave constitutional crisis) to act contrary to or without Ministerial advice. In ordinary circumstances The Queen, as a constitutional monarch, accepts Ministerial advice about the use of these powers if it is available, whether she personally agrees with that advice or not. That constitutional position ensures that Ministers take responsibility for the use of the powers.

>>136369037
They give birth to Shrek?

File: 1501409973216.jpg (50KB, 344x344px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 344x344px

>>136368162

File: 1476720287092.png (370KB, 750x689px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 750x689px

>>136369037
Almost De Niro's sons JUST tier.

File: chelsea.png (108KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 400x400px

>>136368325

>>136369122
He's far to invested in being right to concede to facts.

File: 3382.jpg (65KB, 1240x744px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1240x744px

>>136369203

>>136368398


The chief of the executive being.... the fucking monarch.

you cannot get round this Parliament cannot overrule the monarch.

>>136369122
>tradition

Is tradition legally binding? If not, I don't see why the Queen can't voice her opinion vigorously.

File: .713872520172217696841275142501247120761279612796.jpg (62KB, 503x700px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 503x700px

Mary Beard has said she faced a “torrent of aggressive insults” on social media after posting messages asserting the ethnic diversity of Roman Britain.

The historian had been defending a BBC schools video that featured a high-ranking black Roman soldier as the father of a family, prompting a wave of online abuse. One person said she was “literally rewriting history”.

She said the tone of the debate left her dispirited. “It feels very sad to me that we cannot have a reasonable discussion on such a topic as the cultural, ethnic composition of Roman Britain without resorting to unnecessary insult, abuse, misogyny and language of war, not debate.”
Sign up for the Bookmarks email
Read more

Beard, a classicist at Cambridge University, who is well known for her robust responses to Twitter trolls, was one of those who pointed to evidence that there was at least some ethnic diversity in Britain under Roman rule.

There followed, she said in her blog in the Times Literary Supplement, days of attacks on Twitter, which she described as “a torrent of aggressive insults, on everything from my historical competence and elitist ivory tower viewpoint to my age, shape and gender [batty old broad, obese, etc etc].”

The abuse got worse, she wrote, when Nassim Nicholas Taleb, a professor of risk analysis in the US and author of the best-selling book The Black Swan, joined her critics.

-----------

I beliebe this refers to those cartoons that have been posted on /pol/ quite a lot in the past couple of weeks.

>>136368742
American/10

File: poQn7Fs.jpg (161KB, 1450x816px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1450x816px

>>136369141

>>136369224
Your friend presented no facts at all, other than the Queen has a load of powers she's too weak to exercise.

>>136368889
Precedent and precedence aren't the same though, hence my confusion.

>>136369309
What a whiny cunt.

File: [Pyramid].jpg (124KB, 1024x819px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1024x819px

>>136364126

The EU Army is designed to be used Domestically(NATO is International) to stop countries from leaving/resisting the EU, while also protecting EU "Fortress" Territories that will exist when/during the Islamic Caliphate takes over most of Europe.

[Made threads talking about the EU Army: http://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/boards/pol.x/subject/Knowledge%20Bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/%21%219O2tecpDHQ6/]

NATO arms shipments have been used to bolster it & it's a reason why European Military's have been purposely weakened.

File: Gay gooners.jpg (145KB, 630x447px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 630x447px

>>136369258

>>136369296
Then go over the last 3 threads and re-read every point. I'm truly done with this now. You are the most stubborn and uneducated person I've ever had the displeasure of interacting with on Brit/pol/, and I think we both know how you've twisted your point over the course of 5 hours and argued over terminology, questioned the legal basis of this very country and denied reality in your quest to win an argument on a political general which could've originally been over in 5 minutes if you had of admitted you were wrong.

>>136369282
The executive is government.

>>136368847
Fake, from what I've read, seems to be bastardization of a quote by some evangelist called Kennedy. Still good though.

It's like that supposed kipling poem 'wrath of the awaken saxon' that is actually an edit of his 'Beginnings'

File: 1472571104128.png (136KB, 550x593px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 550x593px

>>136369442
Stop LARPing.

File: 1483159806739.gif (4MB, 400x206px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 400x206px

>>136369339

>>136369469
I haven't twisted the point.

The last five threads have been you telling me I'm wrong without backing it up, and saying that the Queen can't voice her opinion strongly because she hasn't done it before, which isn't convincing to me.

If there's no law preventing her from doing it, then really I don't see the debate. She might face ramifications, but she's free to say what she likes.

>>136369454
Every time you post that image Arsenal win.

>>136369543
even the original poem about the English is really LARPy too

>>136369532

The Government being Her/His majesty's

>>136369543
To be fair the latter is exactly the same bar English being substituted for Saxon, and the title change of course.

>arguing about such basic accepted facts of the operation of the British state in a board dedicated to politics in a general dedicated to Britain.
This is like fit arguing if eating nothing but Mars bars is good for you. It's retarded.

File: Gazza.jpg (43KB, 583x490px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 583x490px

>>136369685

>>136369719
Look up parliamentary sovereignty, they are the supreme legislator.

File: 107j5gg.gif (4MB, 320x216px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 320x216px

>>136369634

File: 1476972892208.jpg (80KB, 640x991px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 640x991px

>China may initiate ‘limited war’ with India

Whose side will we take in the now inevitable Poo/Ping war?

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1475151/china-may-initiate-limited-war-india/

>>136369704
It was written from the perspective of a character in one of his books.

>>136369877
Poo of course. Chinks are inhuman.

>>136369442
Frank, go talk to your mom about why internet people are emailing her.

>>136369769
>basic accepted facts

Not really lad. You have convincingly explained why the Queen can't voice her opinion.

You've given no eventualities that would arise from her doing so. You've provided no precedents derived from former cases. Absolutely nothing.

I'm willing to concede defeat if you actually back up your claims with irrefutable fact, but I haven't yet seen anything of the sort

File: 00mosley2.jpg (22KB, 490x313px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 490x313px

>>136369960
t. Rajesh. Everyone knows that we should take both sides.

>>136369203
>15 first team players
Costa's staying
>>136369877
>BRICS countries fighting each other

File: 1477604246601.gif (2MB, 450x428px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 450x428px

>>136369846

>>136370033
*haven't

>The traditional view put forward by A. V. Dicey is that Parliament had the power to make any law except any law that bound its successors. This has been reconsidered by constitutional theorists including Sir William Wade and Trevor Allan in light of the European Communities Act 1972 and other provisions relating to Europe, and the position of the Human Rights Act

Was it challenged on this basis at the time? Seems like a missed opportunity. Surely it's a clear cut case?

>>136369838

>supreme legislator.

I'm not saying the monarch can make laws over parliament, you dumb cunt. i'm saying they cannot overrule her/him.

>>136369747
True, but the awakened saxon version is much more suited to a burger rw audience, which is where you mostly see it.

>>136369704
Kipling was jingoistic, empire and war, it's what he did. Maybe we need to remember the old ways

Raped and revenged:
One used and butchered me: another spied
Me broken — for which thing an hundred died.
So it was learned among the heathen hosts
How much a freeborn woman's favour costs.

>>136370033
We are a common law state, please read about common law before posting again.

File: 1497444710524.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>>136369877
Pakistan and Tibet

File: ShillsExposed.gif (689KB, 1688x2849px) Image search: [Google]

689KB, 1688x2849px

>>136369559

Never been Larping.

British Police have turned the UK's population into vulnerable sheep. Islam is the wolf(pack) that has free reign to slaughter.

>>136369838
Nope. The Crown is soveriegn and can rewrite laws to their pleasure if they so wish, as they have ultimate authority over parliament.

>>136370127
If parliament voted to do so, they could.

>>136370056
Can you ask Kevin what he had for dinner today, Rimlad? He won't tell me.

>>136370047
Letting them wear each other done for eternity is of course preferable but letting the insects win is unthinkable.

>>136369877
>a "small scale nuclear exchange"

>>136370145
no i mean it was really LARPy, not really violent

File: IMG_0183.jpg (38KB, 663x361px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 663x361px

http://www.strawpoll.me/13640745

http://www.strawpoll.me/13640745

http://www.strawpoll.me/13640745

>>136369877
Pajeet ofc. Fuck dogeating soulless commie chinks

>>136370262
They still need to be granted royal assent.

>>136369442
stop self-referencing as authority. possibly the worst trip on /pol/, and you're posting in a cesspool of trpiscum

you also appear to know fuck all about the EU other than /pol/ approved snark points so please >>>/brexit/ this thread before we threaten your fisheries.

File: Eden Hazard.jpg (59KB, 634x417px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 634x417px

>>136370048
>Costa's staying
No chance, more likely that I get signed up. Everyone is panicking, all we need is another central midfielder and a extra wing back for competition.
also
NO HAZARD NO PARTY

>>136370240
Only in cases of Royal Perogative which does not cover constitutionally transformative matters.

I feel like I'm posting the same arguments over and over again, if you don't understand the words I use, Google them.

>>136370165
I know we are, nothing in common law says the Queen can't voice her opinion.

>>136370323
t. QUINTESSENTIAL

>>136370262

Parliament can vote whatever way they want. they still can't overrule her. it would be a totally futile gesture, like you trying to win this debate.

>>136370339
Which is granted by government

>>136370285
I shall when I see him

>>136370424
If it is not covered by Royal Perogative then Parliament is supreme. It's quite simple, can't see why you're struggling with this

>>136370380
You don't understand. They have full power over parliament. It exists because the monarchy allows it, and it operates in their stead.

>>136364589
The cornish are literally inbreeding. I'm cornish and my ex girlfriends mother married me aunts father. Shits fucked up.

>>136370579
Oh you're a retarded LARPer. Carry on then.

>>136370374
M8 we literally have 15 first team players, 2 of which are injured and one of which has been sacrificed on the altar that is the FA's bullshit
>Kenedy's gone out on loan anyway

>>136370303
Iirc it was written after the death of his son in ww1, I guess he had a reason to start hating

>>136370629
RARE
A
R
E

>>136370667
no, not the hate, it's just the really LARP stuff

>>136370727
Like what?

>>136370693
Kek.

File: .713872520172217696841275142501247120761279612796.jpg (549KB, 1800x925px) Image search: [Google]

549KB, 1800x925px

Large groups of people are on the move, desperate for usable land. Data from NASA satellites reveals an overwhelming degradation of agricultural land throughout Africa, with one recent study showing that more than 40 million Africans are trying to survive off land whose agricultural potential is declining.

At the same time, high birthrates and lengthening life spans mean that by the end of this century, there could be as many as four billion people on the continent, about 10 times the population 40 years ago.

Some Kenyans see Laikipia’s land problems as a black-white issue because most of the biggest ranches and wildlife conservancies are owned by a handful of families of European descent. Kenyans have complained about the size of the white-owned farms, saying many were stolen or unfairly acquired from Africans during colonial times. Some people in Kenya, black and white, are now making comparisons to Zimbabwe, where the government seized land from wealthy whites and redistributed it, often to well-connected elites. In many cases, the farms were run into the ground.

Much of eastern Africa is in the grip of an intense drought, with pasturelands drying up, and the white-owned properties in Laikipia tend to have the best grass. This is because the white farmers are relatively wealthy and have invested in their properties, building dams, creating watering holes, pumping from springs and caring for their paddocks. All that keeps the pastures healthy, attracting the invaders.

---------

Uh oh...

>>136370632
>I don't like the truth so will pretend it doesn't exist

Monarchy can literally dismantle parliament whenever they want. You're so uneducated.

>>136370629
What the fuck you doing in Surinam, lad? Pls say warlord of a vast dusky horde....

>>136370791
the whole thing, it's not remotely subtle
read it again

>>136370868
>Anonymongs into English law
And restore the empire by tea time, right champ?

>Sorry Philip, I can't wear a bear suit because it's unprecedented! It's against common law.

This is what Eddie actually believes

>>136370936
>no, not the hate
>the whole thing
You aren't making sense.

File: uno.jpg (117KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 720x960px

Did you guys know that there's a museum to Stepan Bandera and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists in London? Ivanushchenko is an archivist working with the finally-open archives (only opened in 2015) of Soviet Ukraine to document the history of political repression.

He said, "Give my regards to America!" Such an awesome guy

>>136370849
It's a meme. The rains were a little late this year but I was reliably informed 2 months ago that they came. Kenya's all been patched up by the Chinese and (((Monsanto))) anyway so whitey can't be blamed.

>>136371055
yeah i mean the poem but not the hate bit, not LARPing about being more violent but LARPing about the whole English thing "it was not part of their blood..." etc

>>136370641
>We don't need any goalkeepers
>We don't need any central defenders
>we need 1 wing back for competition
>We need 1 central midfielder for rotation
>We don't need any inside forwards
>We don't need any strikers
Just calm down, Conte will get the players after todays result. Who do you suggest we need?

>>136371055
>>136371133
like imagine if you replaced hate with love
the bit i consider LARPing would still be there

Reminder: if you don't understand the importance of precedent in English Common Law, you're a paki.

>>136371148
a kick up the backside
football is for chumps

>>136371148
>We don't need any central defenders
Yes >we do
>we
should have kept Kenedy, Ake,Costa, and Matic.

>family buisness
>hire my only friend
>goes well for a bit
>today he decides to leave early (before it gets insanely busy) and has the audacity to ask for more money
>my parents comply but he's basically fired
I don't wanna talk to him either tbqh, looks like i'm back to being truly alone.
/blog

>>136371133
>>136371164
It just archaic to us is all because we're a dead people. I see what you mean though I guess.

>>136371205
Never said I didn't.

But what you were banging on about wasn't precedent. It was convention.

Could you just admit you're wrong so I can go for me din dins?

A lot of British flags thinking we live under a stinking European Napoleonic civil law system. Is immigration really that bad?

File: IMG_0177.jpg (130KB, 595x1024px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 595x1024px

Very good comic
>>136370712
>>136370712
>>136370712
LOTR is real history

>>136371287

football talk
>>/sp/ you cunts
you only talk about it to swing your dick. everyon eknows talking about football is a cuck social tactic
>scared of silence
>must say something
>"see the game last night?..."

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=VF_uOgyBK1c

>>136371426
>I enjoy strawmanning because I don't understand precedent

Give me the case that informs your view that the Queen cannot voice her opinion.

If not, do be quiet.

>>136364126
>>MEPs reveal plan for unchecked EU army

I know they are generally derided films, but hasn't anyone seen Star Wars episodes I-II-III?

>>136370311
did they post that on a social media i wanna go torment them can i have the link

>>136371501
>t. Autist

>>136371510
You lost Nappy, Britain and her former colonies operate Common Law. Stay mad. Henry II was right.

>>136371600
Not an argument.

Cite something as precedent or give up.

File: just right2.png (416KB, 557x605px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 557x605px

>>136364126

The continentals are at it again.

File: Habsburg-Splendor-Emperor-Leopold-I_230633.jpg (72KB, 333x475px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 333x475px

>>136371677
>eurocuck needs me to write it down so he can understand it
Put your tricolour back on cunt.

>>136371822
So you can't cite anything as precedent?

Good to know Eddie. You've lost again.

>>136371291
>need any central defenders
No WE don't
Luiz
Cahill
Azpilliceuta
Ruidiger
Christensen
Zouma can be recalled if we have 2 serious injuries

> Kenedy
Shit player
>Ake
Good squad player but he wanted to play games as he wants to get into Holland national side

>Costa
Lunatic who has downed tools since January. LIABILITY

>Matic
Shouldn't have sold him to Man utd. Allegedly Roman sanctioned the move personally as a favour to matic. But £40 million for a 29 year is great

Bakayako is matic's replacement and unfortunately he's recovering from surgery. All we need is a player like Barkley or drinkwater to rotate

>>136371600
Starting to think he's right to be honest. I'm not entirely sure your both arguing about the same thing though, so fuck knows.

>>136371293
>>family buisness
>hire friend
There are your two problems straight away

>>136372028
Because it's lasted 5 hours now. It's beyond a joke. That one guy is destined to be right in his shitty argument, but go back to the Queen Elizabeth II thread where this began. He didn't have a point then, and he doesn't now.

File: 1495048430239.gif (427KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 320x240px

>>136371501

>>136372028
I think he's arguing for the sake of it at this point.

I'm not even claiming anything other than, "if the Queen wants to, she can speak her mind", which ought to be plainly obvious but the tripmong doesn't get it.

>>136372165
You've been confusing precedent and precedence this whole time though so I don't know that you hold much weight.

File: napoleon_orchardson2-1.jpg (20KB, 600x346px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 600x346px

>>136371947
Keep looking through those codes Bonaparte, you won't find our uncodified constitution in there.
Waterloo cunt.

>>136372165
Actually, I did. My point is exactly the same as it was then.

Anyone know the name of the sam hyde/mde video where he's saying don't go stab bankers?

>>136372282
If you post one more of these Euro memes, it's an admission of defeat.

>>136372247
I didn't you utter fucking mong. Go back 2 threads, and I was using precedent when PC posting but when phone posting it autocorrects precedent to precedence if I misplace a letter which is what I was using. My concept of it wasn't wrong and you haven't even followed this argument.

Also new format fix.

>>136372416
>>136372416

File: tripvirginpost.png (155KB, 1890x844px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1890x844px

>eddie

File: Sad Napoleon.jpg (136KB, 636x876px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 636x876px

>>136372357
>p...please stop
UNCODIFIED
N
CUNT
O
D
I
F
I
E
D

FUCK OFF NAPPY

>>136372392
You also didn't say anything other than "the Queen won't do it", which is not only unknowable, but also wasn't the point I was making.

I said she can if she wants to, which she can. I also said she should, which she should.

>>136372539
I said a lot more than that, we ended up arguing over the Indian colonies, and 1688, before you finally made your mind up on what your argument was in your quest to be winner of an internet argument - something you've failed repeatedly at to anybody who has bothered to follow this mess.

>>136371974
>Ruidiger
who
>Luiz
a meme who will be exposed for the fraud he is again this season
>Zouma can be recalled
He's one of the very few players at Chelsea that should actually be out on loan

>Shit player
What happens if Alonso gets injured?

>Good squad player but he wanted to play games as he wants to get into Holland national side
Yeah, we need him in case you haven't noticed. He can play LWB,CB, and CM.

>LIABILITY
This I don't agree with but our main striker is a reject and has red hair from his failed move elsewhere

>But £40 million for a 29 year is great
We could have gotten so much more money from the retard woodward for him

>All we need is a player like Barkley or drinkwater to rotate
Both shit midtable memes

>>136372539
Mate, protip, find an instance where she did break protocol and express political opinions. There are a few...

>>136372725
He can't do that. I already did that to prove that his point was stupid, and that the Queen can express opinions.

>>136370898
Aviation work, guest of the government.

>>136372628
I beat you on 1688, and I've beaten you on this.

Please, counter the following.

"If the Queen wants to, she can voice her opinion forcefully"

That's my point, and it has been since the beginning.

>>136372793
That's awesome, what model jets do you work on? I've heard some crazy shit about Suriname and am an aviation mechanic, is the pay good?

File: waterloo-napoleon-7_1024x683.jpg (76KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1024x683px

REMINDER TO IGNORE CIVIL LAW SHILLS
REMINDER THAT NAPOLEON LOST

driving home now lads, stay strong against the European menace trying to pollute your minds by removing traditional and glorious ENGLISH PRECEDENT and replace it with dirty and fickle EU CODE.

NAPOLEON LOST
IGNORE CIVIL LAW SHILLS

File: tumblr_static_tumblr_static__640.jpg (33KB, 550x310px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 550x310px

>>136366724
T-thanks. . .
>>136367522
Irish heads MUST always be patted, Anglo-senpai b-baka. . .

>>136372835

>>136344947
>>136345522 (me)
>>136345726
>>136345984
>>136346190 (me)
>>136346318
>>136346384 (me)
>>136346567
>>136346716 (me, whom you never responded to)
>>136349107 (me again)
>>136350009

But sure, "you won." You're as wrong as you always were, and
>"If the Queen wants to, she can voice her opinion forcefully"
No it isn't and the proof is in that thread.

hang on you virgins have been arguing since 7am?

>>136373356
I don't think it was that early. I wasn't even awake at 7am.

>>136373259
Don't see you beating me on India there, at all. I was right on India, 100%.

However, I think the problem is you jumped in halfway through my debate with Eddie.

I never said the Queen was likely to speak her mind, just that she should, and can, speak her mind.

>>136373356
Not sure why but when you look at the link just through the thumbnail, it says 7am but if you click on it, it says 12pm. It's been going on for too long though.

>>136370849
Since the government of Africa and unable to fix the African problems, able cult leaders within the african society need to recruit the locals, thus supplying them with a structure and improving the lives of all members.

>>136373556
You changed the topic entirely to blabbering on about finances and ignored every single bit of what my post was.

>However, I think the problem is you jumped in halfway through my debate with Eddie.
I was there from the start. The argument was 3 posts old by the time I had stuck my nose in, and that's only because I couldn't bear to listen to you being wrong any longer.

>>136373356
I called rimmer fat around that time, but I felt bad
so I took a few hours off

>>136373567
oh fairs. been here the last half hour, from what i can tell the other anon arguing against you and eddie is larping now that his point has nothing valuable of substance as it is a hypothetical.

>>136373696
nothing wrong with that lad, rimmier is a chelshit fatty. doesn't want to run to lose weight then posts about his snacks he has been eating.

>>136373702
Baically lad. I've said it too many times but his stupidity prevails every time, but this really is the end of the argument. It's been going on for 7 hours now.

>>136373259
Holy autism mate...