>I believe that being pro-life is libertarian, because there

>>136358946
He's a republican now

I believe that others shoul have the right to kill children, because there is no liberty without blood

>>136359006
Yeah, but I don't think he's changed his mind on any issues. He just thinks he can make it to the senate easier as a republican.

>>136358946
I am. It's a very touchy issue. Other libertarians think you're a tyrant who wants to control women. Like-minded libertarians understand you've actually thought about it deeply and value philosophical consistency over social convenience.

My basic argument: If you grant that personhood exists at some point before the child comes out of the pussy-hole, and since it is objectively impossible to explicitly determine exactly when, it must just be assumed to exist throughout the process. Otherwise you are just playing guessing games with a human life for your own convenience.