Realistically, how many fraudulent/illegal votes do you think were cast in the election?
>>136349717
6 million
>>136349962
FPBP. And
>>136349717
To answer, it would be impossible to tell or prove because of the anonymity of our election system. And we will never know for sure because it's way more important to ensure that anonymity than to prove there were illegal votes cast. Now, that being said, what we can do is ensure that it never happens again. As long as California and states like it allow illegals to get drivers licenses and use that number and that number alone to register to vote we will have illegal voting in those places. We need a social security number based state issued ID/DL program to be able to register to vote or this will never stop.
>>136349717
>>136349717
No idea, it's hard to keep track of illegals.
>>136349717
rural and suburban retards
I doubt we'll ever know the full amount since the DNC by now destroyed a lot of the evidence.
>>136349717
counting Russia's?
>>136349717
I don't think we will never find out but I would say somewhere between 500k and 1 mil. But thats not all keep in mind in the US dead people can also vote.
In the Michigan recount half of Detroit's precincts were ineligible to be recounted because their tallies didn't match the number of ballot papers. In one case a box recorded 300 votes for Hillary but only had 60 ballots inside.
>>136349717
A lot
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-05/california-has-11-counties-more-registered-voters-voting-age-citizens
>>136349717
Well based on the project veritas videos it might be quite a bit. It pisses me off that even the right wing saw those as nothing but an expedient political tool to cause Hillary short term popularity loss - it hinted at widespread corruption but aside from hurting Hillary's poll numbers for the duration of a news cycle they were kind of ignored.
The video with the former dnc commissioner of New York never saa the light of day in the normie news at all, and that's the most damning one