>yfw you realize god exists
I wouldn't call it God in public, if even to yourself. The term creates alot of obfuscation due to the fact that alot of people tie it mentally to the concept of a bearded man in the sky. It's really the Knowledge that there is an underlying generative principle, a creative force at the root of all things. From this force or energy, intelligence itself has sprung forth so it must in and of itself contain said intelligence, encapsulating it. Therefore it must be infinitely greater than all wordly intelligence. You could see it as all intelligence starting at a 1-bit resolution representation of it, growing to ever greater resolutions, more clearly defining this infinite intelligence. Yet it can never be actually be put into words or encapsulated by wordly intelligence as it is outside the realm of space, time or even something as abstract as concepts.
Did you recently come to the conclusion that this force does indeed exist?
>>136265735
UUuuUuUuUuuuuuuuuUuuuuUUuuuuuHhhhhhhhhhh
Du fuq?
>>136266000
What did you not understand?
>>136264902
man what a fucking throwback to the older days of /pol/
>tfw you realise he doesn't care about hummanity
>>136264902
Which one?
>>136266571
the king of gods.
>>136264902
>>136265735
>there is an underlying generative principle, a creative force at the root of all things.
Maybe. At best we can make the observation that things seem to be getting more complex over time. You could probably say that there's some push/pull towards greater complexity.
>From this force or energy, intelligence itself has sprung forth so it must in and of itself contain said intelligence, encapsulating it
I don't see how this idea of encapsulation follows from the previous observation. Intelligence can be seen as an emergent phenomenon resulting from the complexification of our universe.
>Therefore it must be infinitely greater than all wordly intelligence.
You lost me here...