Were the elections polls completely faked?

Yeah, they were. Number pulled entirely from the air at exboard meetings.

>>136260423
>24 million illegals/dead voted in 2012
>THERE WAS NO ELECTION FRAUD HERE CLINTON WON DRUMPFKINS

use your fucking brain retard

i think its pretty obvious that the dems strategy over at least the last year, is to keep trump from gaining any momentum. ANY time he gets an inkling of upward push, BAM #fakenews hits that drops him back down.

>>136260625
>illegals were polled before the election
Try actually fucking reading the question before you answer, newfag.

>>136260423
(((no)))

>>136260423
Not really. When you dig into their data you'll likely find over- and under-sampling of certain demographics. Like: over-sampling Democrats and under-sampling Republicans and especially Independent voters.

This is important. No "cheating" just sampling methods.

>>136260938
Are boomers incapable of learning that the mass media is outright lying?

>>136260625
I mean that's a little excessive.

Yes, they do this for the herd effect.

If Hillary Clinton was ACTUALLY winning, they wouldn't have to keep yelling about how the polls say she's "destroying drumpf".

It's just them trying to make viewers say "well I don't want to be in the minority! I'll look silly if I support Trump! 70% of Americans *must* be right!"

That's how they engineer the thinking of their viewers.

Day of the Rope.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/campaign/315145-one-last-look-2016-polls-actually-got-a-lot-right

>National polls only measure the popular vote. Clinton did, in fact, win the national popular vote by 2.1 points. The average of the 13 final national polls had Clinton ahead by 3.1 points, which was only a point off the actual result.
>Swing state presidential polls: In Florida, the largest of the swing states, the average of the final three polls had Trump ahead by three-tenths of a point. He won the state by 1.2 points. Ohio's last poll gave Trump a 7-point lead, and he carried it by 8.1 points. The average of the three final polls in Pennsylvania had Clinton leading by a single point and the last poll taken had Trump ahead by a point. He won the state by seven-tenths of a point.

File: lemmings.png (2MB, 1468x7317px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1468x7317px

>>136261369
> herd effect.

File: fat-mexican-women-food-stamps-welfare-spics.jpg (218KB, 720x725px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 720x725px

>>136261564
>2.1 points
Has anyone been able to accurately account for the illegal vote yet?

https://youtu.be/ILJDudUpct0
https://youtu.be/jUDTcxIqqM0
https://youtu.be/eQNjXkSeawM

>>136261871
The comission is still in progress

>>136261121

This

They essentially got high on their own supply and bought into the dogma they pushed; ie tons of blacks will come out to vote but not white people

File: nate_dirt.png (1MB, 787x3854px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 787x3854px

>>136262099
>got high on their own supply

>>136261871

Has anyone been able to prove any illegal voting? From this election or any of the others?

>>136260423

worse, polling is just lying with numbers.

how come i'm never asked to participate in these polls?

>>136262282
Yes. plenty of districts were found to have the dead voting, and many in California refused to accept any forms of citizenry confirmation.

>>136260423

The data may be real, but the statistics tell you whatever you wanna hear. Basic procedure in any class of experimental sciences, you learn how to lie while still using the truth.

File: 1481978327594.gif (2MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x202px

>>136262282
>there's no evidence of illegal voting
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEE STOP LOOKING AT VOTER ROLLS

>>136260423
Intentionally faked?
Probably not. More so that polls rely on people being honest, which they generally are not and good sampling, which is very difficult.

>>136260938
Lefty media tried that shit with W before his second run.
It didn't matter.

>>136262816
The media created a shy Tory effect by attacking Trump so much, add in their bizarre belief that blacks would turn out for Hillary like they did for Obama.

Pretty much, those polls were just as much psy-ops as they were heavily biased. The idea is to convince enough people that Trump had no chance, therefore they wouldn't go out to vote.

ITT : reddit nu-/pol/ trying to relive the election like a crack whore longing for her first rush

File: DGZ2f3AVwAAP2D5.jpg (111KB, 675x1200px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 675x1200px

>>136260423
They weren't accurate because they undersampled white working class voters

I keep hearing from Alex about how Hillary stole 6 states, but I have never once heard WHICH STATES these were

What is wrong with Alex Jones?

>>136261244
>Are boomers incapable of learning

Yes. If it didn't come from their childhood years, they don't think it's worth learning.

The better question would be what isn't faked?

File: t.Rural-and-suburban-retard.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>136264015
Nothing is fake what do you mean

>>136260423
Yes. (((polls))) are used to influence public decision not reflect them.

File: ClintonVOTING FRAUD STILL LOSE.jpg (153KB, 1561x733px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1561x733px

>>136262282
>Has anyone been able to prove any illegal voting?
You ignored the links I gave you, they name or link to proof. Note: You don't actually need to prove that any non-citizens voted, just that they were registered to vote (and thus, could vote), which is clearly proven at this point. The fact that illegals did vote is also admitted to in project vertias videos. Proof illegals are registered to vote:

https://publicinterestlegal.org/blog/report-5500-noncitizens-discovered-voter-rolls-virginia/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/15/nearly-2-million-non-citizen-hispanics-illegally-r/
http://www.mclaughlinonline.com/lib/sitefiles/National_Hispanic_Presentation_06-21-13_-_FOR_RELEASE.pdf
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414000973
http://dailysignal.com/2015/06/02/poll-shows-noncitizens-can-shape-elections/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kQQNvMx754

>The paper “Do non-citizens vote in U.S. elections?” by Richman et al., the researchers found that 11.3% of non-citizens reported that they voted in 2008.
>11.3% of 25.9 million is 2.927 million. This is very close to the “3 million” number repeated on conservative websites.
>The Richman paper also said that illegals voted democrat 81% of the time, republican 17% of the time.
Source:
https://archive.is/QvFPP

>Pew and the DHS claims that there are about 11.4 million illegals in the US.
>If 10% of them voted, that would be 1.14 million votes.
Sources:
http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/09/20/overall-number-of-u-s-unauthorized-immigrants-holds-steady-since-2009/
https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/population-estimates/unauthorized-resident

Other Sources:
https://youtu.be/ILJDudUpct0
https://youtu.be/W6NYP9qmjfU
https://youtu.be/wS3rO0jnq2I