Does Drudge own a sex robot?

>>136258336
plot twist: Drudge himself is a sex bot

Can you imagine the advancements humanity will make once we are no longer slaves to the vaginal jew?

>>136258467
Highly likely at this point actually.

>>136258559
To the stars and beyond.

>>136258559
oh ya it will be wonderful when we stop procreating, having families and finalize the collapse of western civilization. Um no, it degenerate and just plain creepy

>>136258803
>stop procreating, having families
Why would any of that stop?
Sexbots are only a replacement for masturbation, prostitution and casual sex.

>>136259155
Highly idealistic thinking. We all know birthrates are already too low. These lifeless bodies along with MGTOW thinking and it just gets worse.

File: fGkgz1qlnbuco1_500.jpg (80KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x500px

>>136258336
This. He's obsessed with it.

>>136259444
TITS OR GTFO

sexbots + artificial wombs = the end of the niggers of gender (women)

>>136258336
>why does drudge run articles?????
because people read the articles.

>>136259401
>We all know birthrates are already too low.
Yeah, but people already fuck a lot and it doesn't help. There's plenty of hooking up but not enough relationships. It's guys being horny all the time that fucks up the SMP. And a fucked up SMP can lead to unstable relationships or people just not wanting relationships.
>These lifeless bodies along with MGTOW thinking and it just gets worse.
Yeah it's the MGTOW types that claim that sexbots could replace women altogether. Which is ridiculous. VERY few people would be happy with a robot in the long run for obvious reasons. It's just a toy.
Most people getting this admit they'd rather be with a real person but they can't currently deal with it or they can't find anyone.
It's not going to replace real sex and relationships anymore than porn did.

File: 1485279689219.jpg (137KB, 822x653px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 822x653px

>>136260075
it's not the end, but it greatly devalues women, which couldn't happen soon enough.

>>136260256
Porn has ruined countless marriages and has fucked up our brains in general. The mere fact that we even think this shit is ok is because of the fucked up effects of porn. I agree that there is a place for these things like with guys who can't get a real woman for whatever reason but my issue is the relentless pumping of them as the next great thing. I smell a globalist agenda.

>>136258336
Never noticed this but OP is right. Drudge only has a few people working for him. Most articles are submitted by readers. There has to be a sex doll enthusiast or connoisseur on the staff or submitting articles.

>>136260939
>Porn has ruined countless marriages
Those marriages probably had trouble to begin with though.
But yeah I read about how some guys just won't quit watching porn even their wife hates it. That's not right. There may or may not be a good reason for why they turned to porn. But either way it's not something that should be considered OK if their partner has a problem with it, no matter what other problems there might be.
>The mere fact that we even think this shit is ok is because of the fucked up effects of porn.
Society is pretty sexualized without porn too. Think of how much effort your average non-Chad spends just trying to get laid. Most guys probably enjoy it. But many do not enjoy it, they're not social enough. But society keeps them horny all the time, and porn is right there, and they might be able to get a sexbot, so you know, why not. It's no wonder there's demand for all of that.
>the relentless pumping of them as the next great thing. I smell a globalist agenda.
Maybe. I just see capitalism trying to turn something into a product again without much concern for the social consequences. Globalists surely do not mind at all though.
Tinder and dating sites already kind of were the commoditization of sex and relationships with people.
Now they want to turn it into an object they can sell.
But yeah, the way they're going to market this and develop the market is going to be the worst part. Because how the fuck do you "develop" a market for having sex with robots? You have to worsen gender relations even more. And feminists and MGTOWs are sure helping them a lot with that.

>>136262311
Perhaps you are right anon. Your perspective seems practical albiet a little idealistic

>>136258336
He's being catty, he's gay and he hates women.

How does it feel to see Western Civilization being driven off of a cliff and have absolutely no way to stop it?

File: best-rambo-survival-knife-600x451.jpg (87KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 600x451px

It's cause Matt drudge is so elusive that he doesn't even have contact women. He's probably in space rn.

>>136258336
Ive noticed this slant as well as his pre gay tranny slant. Did some googling, turns out Matt Drudge is a faggot.

No longer consume media from him due to his clear bias.

>>136258336
If he does its a dude. Matt Drudge is gay. No joke.

File: 170_male_lovedoll_herman_03.jpg (96KB, 552x827px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 552x827px

>tfw i'm not a doll