Face it, White Nationalist Anons: there is no way you can put explicitly pro-white nationalist policies in place without the media, the Republicans, and even Trump spewing on you. The question becomes, can you advocate for STEALTH policies that achieve white nationalist ends without saying so explicitly. For instance, meritocracy instead of Affirmative Action will drop black participation in colleges, the bureaucracy, and business leadership to near zero. Supporting "safe spaces" amounts to letting racial minorities self-segregate themselves.
What can we do or say or advocate that will advance white nationalist goals without explicitly labeling them white nationalist?
>>136245758
I couldn't agree more OP.
For starters, I think a "crackdown on illegal immigration" is a good starting point to stop the flow of spics. The travel ban from muslim countries is also good, keep this in place.
I also think the increasing distrust of (((mainstream meteors))) will make a lot of people look elsewhere for their news. For obvious reasons, this helps us.
Also, underrated thread.
>>136245758
>meritocracy instead of Affirmative Action will drop black participation in colleges,
Isn't it so, that the only race that would profit through meritocracy is the Asian one?
Additional: advocating genetic engineering of babies. It achieves the same goals as eugenics and people already see white qualities as desirable.