YLYL: Women edition

>>136212722
>pic
It's fucking true.
Holy fuck I wouldn't ever want to hire a woman if this shit could happen but I guess I'd be forced to.

>>136213420
As Scott Adams says, the best answer is to just play the game. Dealing with difficult women is in the same league as dealing with a child or a retard.

Just play along and don't get caught in the vortex when western civilisation collapses.

>>136213814
I can't find a copy of the original article but here's something Jezebel wrote: http://jezebel.com/5786019/dilbert-creator-deletes-misogynist-rant

The best paragraph:

The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. It's just easier this way for everyone. You don't argue with a four-year old about why he shouldn't eat candy for dinner. You don't punch a mentally handicapped guy even if he punches you first. And you don't argue when a women tells you she's only making 80 cents to your dollar. It's the path of least resistance. You save your energy for more important battles.

His follow up comment on the feminist websites who screeched about him:

That's the reason the original blog was pulled down. All writing is designed for specific readers. This piece was designed for regular readers of The Scott Adams blog. That group has an unusually high reading comprehension level.

In this case, the content of the piece inspires so much emotion in some readers that they literally can't understand it. The same would be true if the topic were about gun ownership or a dozen other topics. As emotion increases, reading comprehension decreases. This would be true of anyone, but regular readers of the Dilbert blog are pretty far along the bell curve toward rational thought, and relatively immune to emotional distortion.