IQ and genetics

>>136205204
I don't know why the school systems hide it, but I got a look in the file cabinet once.

We were all within 3 points of each other.

>>136205204
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960200137X

>>136205415
Were you all the same ethnicity and backgrounds?

Trigger warning
Author is black

https://jaymans.wordpress.com/jaymans-race-inheritance-and-iq-f-a-q-f-r-b/

https://jaymans.wordpress.com/hbd-fundamentals/

>>136205987
shabbos negro

>>136205204

This is another concise and well-argued review of IQ heritability research. Given at Google HQ in 2011. I saw it live

https://youtu.be/62jZENi1ed8

File: 1500958105490.jpg (149KB, 924x1400px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 924x1400px

>>136205204

Charles Murray has done a lot of work on IQ. Also the American SAT is almost a century old now and still the best tool of measurement for it.

The races of men have very definitive outcomes along the bell curve

Jews are the smartest, followed by East Asian, Whites, etc etc, at the far back are Blacks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r0hqvPwvZM

twin studies. 1000's of them.

>>136205204
no dude there's no "proof" at all. every nigger on planet earth can be just as intelligent as east asians. it's the oppression of the white man that causes the collective IQ of the entire population of niggers to be more than one standard deviation lower than the chinese.