Lolbertarians, explain yourselves?

File: 1498621929009.png (144KB, 1155x852px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1155x852px

>>136161376
Fuck off back to 8ch nazi

>>136161520
Call that an argument? Sad

>>136161376
That wouldn't be neccesary in not for crap like federal regulations and minimum wage. It's nearly impossible to get a business off the ground in the first world.

Not arguing if its good or bad but I assume its generally argued as legitimate because its their property and responsibility? After all importing workers would be under their sponsorship. They would have to live off their property (unless there is a public/commons space). Damages and other issues as a result of importing workers would partly be and should be the importers responsibility unless the importees are able to become independent property holders (land in this case the person would still own their own body property regardless which is why its shared responsibility). I guess you could sue them for damages to you and other properties. Intellectual influence however, which is what I think 4chan users are scared of (for instance religion, values, morals etc) is really hard to gauge who is really responsible for that if the other surrounding members of the society choose to adopt them on their own due to indoctrination, meme, rhetoric or whatever.

>>136162239
There will still inevitably be large businesses employing many thousands even without those regulations, why WOULDN'T they want to maximize profit if they can? If you're advocating for them to actually have to compete for once too.

>>136162239
Also what's so great about sweatshop work anyway?