This is the most important thing.

>>136155583
shit sucks sean. fuck you.

This is genius.

Complete animalistic sexual behavior in men is characterized by the pursuance of having sex with many women with disregard for choosing a single mate to create a family with.

Complete animalistic sexual behavior in women is characterized by the pursuance of a man or many men for only their high sexual
prowess with disregard for the creation of a strong family due to:
A. The desire for the woman to put off raising a family in this pursuit, which also contributes to a long-term negative effect in the creation of a family in section C.
B. The unlikelihood that a man with high sexual prowess will settle down and raise a child with the particular woman given the fact
that he has many other options and may be animalistic himself.
C. The elimination of the possibility of raising a strong family with a man who has less sexual prowess than any man the woman has
had sex with before. The reason for this is that a woman will only remain submissive and desire to be with the man who is the top alpha
male in her sexual past. The alpha male creates in the woman feelings and pleasure that is unmatched by others, and is the only man
that can truly command respect from the woman in a relationship. A man who remains in a relationship with a woman in which he has no
possibility for becoming the top alpha male in her sexual history is a beta and therefore weaker and inferior to the actual alpha male
from the perspective of the woman and her feelings. If the woman disregards her sexual hierarchy and starts a family with a beta male,
the partnership is doomed to be weak and they will fail in remaining together and fail to create strong offspring. The woman may have
chosen the beta for his provider status because of her inability to hold down an alpha male. The beta is a provider of both monetary and emotional support for the woman. The woman is the dominant person in the relationship with the beta male because she holds the locus of power in the relationship-

her sexual feelings and needs that are not being met.

Before continuing, "sexual value" is the numeration of a person's standing in the socio-sexual power structure created by men and
women based on people's sexual desirability. This does not only involve physical looks, but a number of factors.

In a society that heavily leans on the animalistic side, the vast majority of the male population does not have a stake in society
because they are not having sex, and they are not reproducing. The animalistic men have sex with many women that range on the sexual
value scale from high to low value. Animalistic men of high sexual value have no problem having casual sex with women of lower sexual
value to quench the sexual drive because the sex is seen as easy to obtain and convenient, and because purely sexually speaking in
the eyes of the animalistic man, a body is a body to a certain extent. The animalistic women only choose to have sex with top men,
even though they may be of a lesser sexual value and risk being discarded, or they desire to move from top male to top male. The
woman of lower sexual value perceive that they are of the same sexual value as the top man she has had sex with. As you can see the
people that are having sex are only top men and all women. Men that are not top men, which may be the bottom 80 or 90 percent of men
in the population, are not having sex or are barely having sex with women that are well below the women of equal sexual value that
these men would normally be having sex with if society was not comprised of animalistic men and women. Men and women of equal sexual
value would pair and everyone would be having sex and forming relationships no matter what their sexual value is. Animalistic women
may eventually decide to settle down with lesser value men than they have experienced before, and these men will have some sex, but
to say that those pathetic instances of manipulative pity sex count as

healthy is delusional and wrong. It is important for a society
that everyone, especially men, is having consistent healthy sex and this plays out later in the formation of a strong family.

The number of sexual partners in a woman's past matters. The higher the partner count, the more likely that one of her previous
partners was of greater sexual value than her current partner if in a relationship. High partner counts are also correlated with an
animalistic and hedonistic woman who seeks men that are of much greater sexual value than herself. A hedonistic woman will also
lose the ability to pair bond for the long term with a man as she bounces from one man to another and becomes broken, causing her
to be unable to form a strong relationship with a man and therefore continue to go from one man to the next, with also men
influencing this by being disinterested in being in a long-term relationship with her due to disgust, fear and knowledge that it
won't last or be a strong fulfilling connection, and the threat of being inferior. A hedonistic women is likely to develop a high
partner count, and a high partner count woman is likely to be hedonistic. The effects on a man in being in a relationship with a
woman who has had sex with someone in her past of greater sexual value are tremendous and ruinous. The woman has experienced
someone of greater value and expects that same value or better in the future- it is in her nature to feel this way. If not
fulfilled, the woman will not appreciate her man, develop a growing resentment and disrespect towards him, and be depressed. The
man will feel inferior and be depressed and this is the important aspect. The relationship

should be broken by either side as a
mismatch, but if not, destruction follows. The higher the sex count in women, the higher the stakes are for these women to find a
suitable man, and the less likely men of lower sexual value will find a women of the same sexual value that has not had sex with
someone of higher sexual value. It is important for women to have respect for the truth and therefore have respect for themselves,
other men, and the betterment of society. If women do not have a respect for the truth I have laid out above, then they are
ignorant or wrathful. If men do not have a respect for the necessary curbing of being animalistic, then they are ignorant or
wrathful.

The men of lower sexual value (which may be 80 to 90 or even 99 percent of the total male population depending on how animalistic or
hedonistic the women in the population are) that are not having sex in the animalistic society revert to activities that attempt to
fill the sexual void, but this in turn only weakens the man even further and may completely destroy the man. Without consistent sex,
which is least destructive if in a consistent long-term relationship, it is easy for masculinity in men to decline and it is replaced
with depression, weakness and the man may even start to develop femininity. Men who are not having sex do not have a stake in
society, and if they did, their diminished masculinity, depression and weakness do not build society to its greatest potential. A man
who is not having sex not only loses his care for building society, he does not care for life in general. The man is not only missing
out on sex, he is missing out on one of the greatest and most important things that makes life worth living- the loving companionship
of a person of the opposite sex. This is a life that is not worth living, leading to destruction.

The large percentage of men are constantly bombarded with sexual women, but are denied access to sex or choose to withdraw from
pursuing sex with animalistic/hedonistic women that pursue casual sex. The denial or lack of sex creates wrath and depression. In
order to be happy and in order to retain a healthy level of animalistic nature, men need a sexual outlet, but if there are no women
that want to be in relationships the man's only choices are to experience a sexual outlet by becoming highly animalistic and pursuing
casual sex, rape, or relinquishing power and animalistic nature through masturbation. Even though masturbation is a sexual outlet, it
is an unhealthy one that only weakens the man and makes him more frustrated and unsatisfied.

A lack of sex is one of the worst sufferings a man can experience. This is part of why women should dress modestly. Dressing
immodestly attracts sexual attention. Immodest dress is defined as wearing clothes that showcase the body of the woman through either
exposure or tightness. Women that dress immodestly in public are attracting sexual attention from other men and this is bad for many
reasons. Whether she is in a relationship or single, this sexual attraction causes the men viewing her to desire to have sex with
her. This desire is 99.9999999999% likely to not be gratified in every instance any man looks at the woman. This rising of desire and
denial of fulfillment creates a great negative physiological and mental effect on the man. This negative effect could even develop
into pure torment depending on how aware the man is of his powerlessness in his sexual

urge and inability to quench the sexual urge.
Regardless of the awareness, there is always the underlying negative physiological effect. If the man does not feel a desire to have
sex with the sexually attractive woman showcasing her sexuality, he is no longer a man and this is bad. It is ridiculous to think
that men can and must completely eradicate their sexual urge to appease women that want to show off their body and gain attention
without there being any sort of negative consequences.

How a woman presents herself is a window into her entire being. The more immodestly dressed, the more hedonistic and animalistic,
among other negative personality traits, in which men are repulsed by the thought of a long-term relationship. A woman who dresses
more immodest should only expect to be pursued by animalistic and hedonistic men who desire casual sex, or men slightly less extreme
but overall disinterested in pursuing her for a true long-term relationship. Single men who

do not desire casual sex, but rather
long-term relationships, feel a deep powerlessness as they view a constricted dating pool when they see women who dress immodestly.
With the sexual liberation of women, women only choose to have sex with the very top percentage of men. This exacerbates the mental
destruction of the rest of men because they hopelessly realize they will never have sex with women who are even on their same level
and realize that these women are only choosing top tier men.

If a woman is in a relationship the man in the relationship is a cuck and/or a menace if he enjoys/allows the showcasing of his
woman. He is a menace because he contributes to the situation before. If she is dressing immodestly and in a relationship, she is
attracting attention from other men thus cucking the man in the relationship because the immodest dress is signaling she is not
receiving enough attention from her man and is seeking out attention from other men. She may consciously or unconsciously want a
better man and may act on the attention she gains by dressing immodestly and leave her man for another.

Continued later on:

When women are "sexually liberated" or "animalistic" they choose to have sex with only the top alpha men as seen above. Add to this
the acceptability and even push for hedonism as an intelligent decision and women are even more likely to pursue casual sex with top
alpha men. Due to all of this a large percentage of men are not having sex. The men that are having all of the sex are only so many,
and they are likely to be animalistic and discard a long-term relationship, so most women do not form families with them. But these
women may eventually decide it is in their best interest to settle for a beta provider rather than be alone, so families may still be
formed. And so everything works out, everyone is happy, and society is comprised of strong well-formed families. But that is not what
actually happens. What happens is the rise of the cuckold culture, in which sexually promiscuous women dominate a relationship with a
beta male. The man pursues the nature of the cuckold because there are no other options and it may act as a defense mechanism to an
extremely difficult dating situation. Whether or not the relationship becomes a true cuckold relationship in which the woman pursues
men of higher sexual prowess while using the beta as a provider does not matter. What matters is that the men in these relationships
are not dominant and they become weak and submissive. This passes on to the child in which a girl lacks a strong father figure and
ends up like the mother, and a boy ends up either weak like the father or despises the father and mother and becomes overly
aggressive and animalistic. There are far more and deeper mental problems passed on to the offspring in this family. What needs to
happen is women need to control themselves and men need to be strong in order to keep women in check.

With oversocialization and artificiality you have men and women waiting very long to have children, and they have very few children,
maybe one child, maybe none. A lot of the time women who were previously highly animalistic and hedonistic find it convenient to act
in an artificial fashion as they age and try to settle down with a beta provider, maybe partly as a hope for salvation and
compensating for previous lifestyle choices, and partly to make it bearable to exist in a relationship in which the woman is not
attracted to her husband. Feminism, a mindset of much contradiction and confusion, is the product of both a highly
artificial/oversocialized AND animalistic society. With the artificial side you facilitate the women's confusion in if they want to
act like men or women in various areas, animalistic you get the pursuance of sex, combination you get unwanted pregnancies or no pregnancies.

Animalistic men and women leads to unwanted pregnancies, with either a child being born with separation of the parents likely in
the near future, or preventative measures like birth control or abortion taking place. Birth control is a major component in the
creation and facilitation of the sexually animalistic mating mess, causes serious negative physiological and mental side effects
for the woman (a list so long and far-reaching I will not list it here, do your own research and analysis and you will see how
unhealthy, detrimental, and dangerous it can be), and may be causing the contamination of the water supply with female hormones,
contributing to the physical feminization of man, and physical overfeminization and hormonal imbalance in women. (No one seems to
care about the possibility of this phenomena or take it seriously, it seems as if the feminization

of man is all part of the plan.)
As a possible alternative to artificial synthetic birth control, I advocate looking into "fertility awareness", in which the
woman's natural reproductive cycle is monitored over a long period of time and days are determined when the woman can and cannot
conceive. This will also naturally lead people to seek loving and long-lasting relationships rather than the quick sex birth
control facilitates. Abortion helps facilitate the sexually animalistic mess and is the destruction of a life as it forms in the
womb of the mother. Whether or not you believe the life form in the womb is human or not, it causes damage to the mental well being
of the mother and damage to the collective conscious regarding the value of life.

A child raised by a single mother has deep mental problems. If the father was not animalistic it is far better for a child to be
raised by a single father. The reason for the split of the parents may be a combination of the mother being destructive in choosing
the wrong mate and the father being destructive in being animalistic. There is a correlation between the father being animalistic and
the women becoming a single mother because it is likely she pursued the man for his sexual prowess instead of his ability to be a
strong father. Simply put, a boy raised by only a woman never learns from his father how to be a man. The girl raised by only a woman
never learns to respect men and is never guided by a loving father figure in learning things like self-control. The boy never
cultivates true masculinity and the girl never cultivates true femininity. The same goes for a child raised by two men or two women.
In all of these scenarios the child is brought up in confusion and is exposed to destructive tendencies.