Is /pol wrong again?

Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
Is /pol wrong again? 2017-08-04 06:09:16 Post No. 136154557
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 12112.jpg (7KB, 299x168px) Image search: [Google]

Is /pol wrong again? Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:09:16 Post No. 136154557 [Report]

There might be a chance that (((they))) are actually not responsible for the words trending on twitter.
Check this out:
>Twitter (TWTR) earns 85% or more of its revenue from advertising. In the second quarter of 2017, Twitter posted an advertising base of $489 million, which was an 8% decrease of advertising revenue the social media site brought in during the same time in 2016. Twitter uses promoted tweets, promoted accounts and promoted trends. Twitter sells promoted tweets to marketers, and these then appear in users' Twitter feeds. The company creates tailored advertising opportunities by using an algorithm to make sure promoted tweets make it into the right users' timelines. Promoted accounts are those paid for by an advertiser that Twitter places in targeted users' "Who to Follow" list.

http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/120114/how-does-twitter-twtr-make-money.asp

Do the leftists just spend more money on advertising?

Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:10:07 Post No.136154629
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:10:07 Post No.136154629 [Report]

>>136154557
>Do the leftists just spend more money on advertising?

No shit Sherlock, i bet you studied somewhere.

money 2017-08-04 06:11:20 Post No.136154747
[Report]

money 2017-08-04 06:11:20 Post No.136154747 [Report]

I was wondering how Twitter is generating revenue and found out that the most part is through advertising. Strange enough that the are no direct ads on their site.

Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:11:40 Post No.136154781
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:11:40 Post No.136154781 [Report]

>/pol

This is a shill thread fyi

Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:13:24 Post No.136154943
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:13:24 Post No.136154943 [Report]

>>136154557
Yes, the left spends more on advertising.

Also, this is the backround economic reasoning Youtube has on its new Orwellian censorship. The advertising sector grouped together and threatened alphabet with all sorts of things from boycotts to lawsuits if they allow their advertisements to be shown with any content that they don't like.

They just relabel anything they don't like as hate speech, bigotry, racism, terrorism, supporting violence, etc.

There's nothing we can do about this.

money 2017-08-04 06:13:31 Post No.136154955
[Report] Image search: [Google]

money 2017-08-04 06:13:31 Post No.136154955 [Report]

File: 1498369296031.jpg (46KB, 680x382px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 680x382px

>>136154781
sure, faggot.

money 2017-08-04 06:16:22 Post No.136155240
[Report]

money 2017-08-04 06:16:22 Post No.136155240 [Report]

>>136154943
Is there public information about that what you're sayin?

Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:18:15 Post No.136155419
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-08-04 06:18:15 Post No.136155419 [Report]

>>136155240
Yes look it up.

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/