The president likes to retweet, here's why that's a bad idea

Nobody cares.

We didn't elect this dude because of how clean and nice he is.

>>136125967
>X happened, here is why you should think like this about it:
I hate buzzfeed so very much

>>136126221

What part of this is up for debate? I'm explaining something that will happen f it hasn't happened already. If you think it's no big deal then that's good because I never said it's a big deal to me.

>>136126712
Oh my god, you really are this stupid?!

>>136126776

No, are you?

>>136126904
It was an exclamation not an actual question. Hence the "!" at the end, indicating it is *not* a question.

>>136127009

You had a question mark don't deny it.

>>136125967

Can we just delete this fucking thread? OP Clearly doesn't give a shit.

>>136127117
Alright I'm done, I don't know how to explain this to you, read some books maybe that will help. Learn how to read properly first though.

>>136127009
An exclamation mark after a question mark is just an exclaimed question.

Are you fucking stupid?!

Yes you are.

>>136127117
>>136127207
OK girls, break it up
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question

>>136127373
Is a rhetorical question a question?!

File: Liberalmedia.webm (207KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1920x1080px

>>136125967
they already openly pay a "veterans against trump" account to harrass him constantly so that he looks like he hates the troops
anyone who believes in the liberal media at this point is as bad as a communist

>>136127440
Yes technically, but it is a rhetorical device - an implied statement in the guise of a question.

Thanks for shitting up the board OP.

>>136127440
>inb4 you claim you were asking a rhetorical question

>>136125967
Like I care, the people who visit his twitter regularly are the anti-trumpers posting muh russias and waiting 24/7 for him to tweet so they can post another muh russia

>>136125967
just came here to save it and then close the thread

>>136128096
the piercing looks out of place

File: 584EpEcg.jpg (26KB, 728x974px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 728x974px

>>136126221
>>136126712
>>136126776
>>136126904
>>136127009
>>136127117
>>136127207
>>136127364
>>136127373
>>136127440
>>136127784
>>136127911
You're really shit at your job.

>>136126221
Thank you. This is the worst trend in journalism since...I don't know what. It's not just buzzfeed doing it, either. Major outlets (usually in the opinion section) often have headlines in this format:
>______ happened, here's why you should think this about it
or
>No/Yes, ________, something really is/isn't like that
>No/Yes, ________, is a bad/good thing for society

really shows a fundamental view (a wrong one, I think) that journalism is primarily to answer HOW and WHY rather than just WHAT.