Clinton/Podesta/DNC/etc. email leaks

>>136075784
they both admitted it.

>>136075895
So they openly admitted to having emails discussing the pedo conspiracy in code, stating the use of violence and intimidation as a political means to an end, along with violating countless security protocols and nothing came of it? How would that even work?

>>136075784
>implying wikileaks which has a 100% track record of legitimacy being false
go back to watching CNN stupid nigger, you dont belong here
sage for being such shit thread

>>136075784
Wat

>>136076591
Doesn't really answer my question. I'm just asking if there's any tangible proof.

>>136076132
They admitted the emails were real and "stolen." They never admitted to any alleged codes.

>>136075784
http://whatismyipaddress.com/email-header

They can be verified with the email trace header. You can literally verify any wikileaks email.

https://wikileaks.org/DKIM-Verification.html

Also, second debate in the US pres election, Clinton was asked a question about one of the wikileaks emails which depicted a speech given to Goldman employees (specifically regarding her need to have a "public and a private policy").

Reminder that Wikileaks has literally never been proven false on anything.

Well then...