Is this true?
https://twitter.com/byzanyx/status/887513357061959680
>>136042529
What's wrong with utilitarianism? Isn't that why we have to feed starving niggers or whatever?
I forgot to add: Serious replies only.
No.
>muh aristocracy
Is this even for real?
>>136043095
>Serious replies only
No!
define nobility
>>136042529
What imbues "Excellence" without merit?
Nobility cannot be quantified. Efficiency can.
>>136042529
It is indeed true. The term "meritocracy" was originally used by Michael Young in his 1958 book "The Rise of the Meritocracy". It wasn't meant to be a good thing. Summary here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_of_the_Meritocracy
>>136042529
Who is the quote from? Sounds like Evola or similar.
>>136044129
It's from the twitter I linked. The guy is a so-called "Aryanist".
>>136042529
Sociopaths and psychopaths thrive in meritocracies.
>>136042724
Most of the time it's not wrong. Yet it's an inconsitent philosophy. Utilitarians for example argue for capitalsim because on average it makes people on average more wealthy wich is good argument to make but there are cases where this logic comes to an end.
Lets say we have a small minority in a society that everyone hates and the vast majority would gain great pleasure from killing those people of even if the minority has done nothing harmfull to the majority. There is utility in killing them but that doesn't make it right.
>>136044723
He seems like a nut, ALL HIS TWEETS ARE IN CAPITALS.