Three questions for socialists.

File: 0hzl2wdhym9z.jpg (56KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x480px

First, do you recognize that it is primarily unfit organisms dying off that is the engine of natural selection?

Secondly, do you recognize that ONLY as a byproduct of this natural selection that cooperation between groups and within groups is possible? (i.e., an organism cannot cooperate symbiotically within its own species or another species if it is unfit for survival -- Ants are great at cooperating because the ants which did not cooperate died off)

Finally, do you recognize that there exists sexual markets which arise from competition between the sexes in all sexually reproducing species? (i.e., competition for the chance at reproduction that increases natural selection within all groups of animals capable of reproduction)

If you recognize all of these FACTS, how can it ever be asserted that capitalism is less effective than socialism?

It is, after all, competition for scare resources that kills off those unfit to produce that creates the bountiful Western civilization full of productivity.

Only as a byproduct of the bounty produced by the free market is any amount of social welfare possible.

How can you not see that cutting competition out of production divorces theory from harsh painful reality which kills off unsustainable models paradoxically allowing life and free, prosperous societies to exist?