Be a Man

File: JFKVector.jpg (74KB, 970x1213px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 970x1213px

Why is it that when youre told to "Be a Man" its fitted with all these commonly known, preconceived, societal standards for what qualifies males to be respectable men?
Its only under the eye of the public mind I might add- that when someone says the above phrase, an average thought would come to mind the image of a strong chin, a wide chest, and perhaps financial status coupled with personal responsibility which can be represented by owning a home or a car. By being morally right and sacrificing personal interests to pursue realistic skills one can only hope they satisfy the public image presented in their conscious.
But one cannot say "Be a woman", because loosely, there is no defining factor it takes to make women fit societies expectations of the female status. You simply have to exist and you are hitting the bar, while the other half of the population must produce objective results. Only in the west and only as recent as the early 19th century were women given the "keys" to civilization via right to associate their opinions in our political forebearings both foreign and domestic. Women dont have to produce loyalty to the ingroup or tribe because its in their nature to mate with the top 20% of successful males regardless of who said males hold loyalties too. The idea of absolute equality is absurd and akin to nothing. The only thing thats truly equal is the number zero, with the collective response that zero is better than any negative while any advance toward the positive is leaving behind the perfect zero that does oh so well not to step on anyones toes. I dont want to hear anyone bitching that women are objectified, sexualized, or mistreated more than anyone else when the sole contribution our communities expect them to produce are narrowed down to two occupations : Mother and housewife . Something that has been organically introduced throughout centuries of evolution.