So /pol/ kept talking about Pizzagate but i went to snopes and they said it's not real. Who do i believe, a professional site that does deep research or an anime imageboard?
Except the (((professional))) (((fact checkers)) were two nobodies who do it as a hobby.
Well when the people your trying to exspose can influence and control the checks and balances like snoops meant to keep them from crazy amount of power, providing an actual smoking gun can only get you so far.
>>136015716
>Who do I believe?
>The people who lie to me for a living?
>Or people who tell you what they think for free?
well here is the world's largest pizzagate picture database: alanowhere.imgur.com
not that you can click on it (there are rules against clicking on links) we know who you are and who you work for.
>>136015716
There might be something true about PG, but /pol/ was mostly circlejerking about some non-evidence
Probably a psy-op to discredit us
>>136016313
you must be new here.
http://www.missingkids.org/missingkids/servlet/PubCaseSearchServlet?act=usMapSearch&missState=VA&searchLang=en_US&casedata=latest
>>136015716
oh boi...
>>136015856
>>136016059
>>136016195
Name one (1) instance when a Snopes article has been (undeniably) proven wrong. I'll wait.
>>136015716
Snopes fact-checking:
>Snopes investigator checks the same public/internet sources we do.
>Only difference is it's just one investigator.
>Investigator calls police/media/political source who says it's nothing.
>Snopes investigator says "Ok!"
>Writes up article debunking any conspiracy.
>Spends two hours tops working on any one story.
>Gets shekels.
/pol/ investigators:
>thousands of diggers dedicating dozens, if not hundreds of hours each looking for truth.
>are not paid.
>rightfully distrust people in power.
>>136016782
I will be nice, since you are being paid to do this. I will debunk PizzaGate. First off in the snopes article there is no actually debunking or investigation that occurs. They simply link to this article (headline was edited later) from the New York Times.
In the original NYT article that snopes cites:
>they make the absurd accusation (strawman) that: Conspiracy Theorists claim Hillary Clinton molests children in the Bathroom at comet pingpong
I have to say this is incredibly stupid. Their "Investigation" only did one thing: Interviewed james alefantis the owner of Comet PingPong.
>James People are saying you are a pedophile who rapes children.
>No I don't rape children.
I'm not joking, that is the only investigation they did. Here is the article if you don't believe me.
http://archive.is/Kl5KL
>>136017799
>>136015856
>>136016782
>(((snopes)))
>>136016782
Here is the link once again to STORY the New York Times posted:
http://archive.is/Kl5KL
AND here is the proof that the original title was in fact
FACT CHECK: THIS PIZZERIA IS NOT A CHILD TRAFFICKING SITE
>>136016416
>have you seen this child?
>pic of grownup nigger
maybe he just got someone pregnant
>>136015716
lol snopes rhymes with dopes
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
>>136016782
sure. here's one that Snopes said was unproven (and used strawman arguments with) that is clearly proven.
http://www.snopes.com/clinton-hired-child-actor/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEqU71k0zAc
and if Snopes had kept digging, they would have found this as corroboration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPmVUxacYuw