The whole NatSoc-movement, which can be split up in many section like the alt-lite, alt-right or others, got a lot of attention due to the US-election. It got very popular, but the great influx of normies in our movement does waterdown the message on one hand and on the other make us less popular due to some faggots sperging out (Kekistan and t_d etc.).
What happened? Did anybody notice grwoing resistance?
>>135996970
>The whole NatSoc-movement, which can be split up in many section like the alt-lite, alt-right or others
For the gorillionth time, the alt-right is NOT natsoc. It hardly has anything in common with natsoc, even though its "leaders" pretend to be "implicitly natsoc", they are actually AGAINST natsoc beliefs in many ways (if not, in all ways). They want you to think they are some kind of new, stylish, smart, sophisticated natsoc -- but they're lying. Read Mein Kampf, read Feder's books. Learn what its really about.
https://pastebin.com/vPZPyDhK
>>135996970
Natsoc is a nice idea but I don't agree with the whole white supremacy thing and anti-Jewish shit.
>>135996970
Subtle redpilled and memeing does not hurt a movement that is basically non existent
Planting the seeds in normies through redpilled satire is not a bad thing.
Pol natsocs are like the antifa of the right, you are why Leftypol is growing.
But at least you have reddit now!
>>136000829
this. fascism and nazism have no influence, so anything is a plus