Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Hey /pol/, this idea that diversity is strength comes up a lot on the left. A diverse gene pool is good, that is undoubted. But why is diverse races in a country innately something good? From all I personally see is that it causes problems. Race relations are high in America, that seems like a big weakness to have our population split. It is not as if black people can have certain great ideas whites cant and thats why we need them. In fact one might argue black culture is a step backward. Most countries have a homogeneous ethnic group, but they are never attacked as being racist.
So /pol/, what are your thoughts on strength in diversity? Is it wrong or is it right? Examples are more than welcome.
>>
Miscegenation is bad
>>
>>135983305
Diverse gene pool doesn't keen different subspecies you fucking idiot. It means that everyone in a town shouldn't be closely related on some way for example, not that you need Somalian niggers I'm your nice white town.
Strength can NEVER, EVER come from diversity. DIVERSITY BRINGS DIVISION.
>>
>>135983835
Like, legit, double check your work before submitting it, its hard to understand you with your errors. I know inbreeding is a whole different thing than races. I was just saying weaknesses can come from an un-diverse gene pool. So its good to have a diverse gene pool. BUT diversity in race does not make a country strong. You can have a diverse gene pool with one race.
>>
>>135984257
A diverse gene pool DOES NOT MEAN A RACIALLY DIVERSE GENE POOL
>>
File: diversity.jpg (72KB, 720x685px) Image search:
[Google]
72KB, 720x685px
>>135983305
>>
>>135984629
I never said it did, I in fact said a diverse gene pool does NOT mean a racially diverse one in the comment you are replying to. Can you not read? You started this conversation at 100 for no reason, tone it down a notch.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2