What does /pol/ think of Distributism?

>>135977616
Mutualism is a far better system to strive for

I actually do wonder what the hell would happen if the entire population of the US were self-sufficient

Everyone has a home, grows their own food, has a steady supply of water and solar power; what would it look like?

>>135977616
It's basicly catholic theocracy in disguise. We will get a little bit of land and a cow to feed yourself of/be allowed to have a small, home based workshop. But what about things like factories, mines and so on? Well the church will own all that shit.

>>135977616
>Christian principles

Christcucks need to kys

>>135977850
Who would produce the solar panels? Who would keep the roads? Who would produce the cars?

>>135977909
>what about things like factories, mines and so on
They would all be either employee-owned or coops.

>>135977850
>I actually do wonder what the hell would happen if the entire population of the US were self-sufficient
Dk you not understand certain crops dont grow ijn certain places and that certain resources arent found in certain places and so on and so forth? This is why there is nok state that is an autarchy in current day, as well as why this is an impossible ideal to strive for
Trade or organization is necessary

>>135977911
t. pagan savage

>>135977996
>employee-owned
Oh yeah, because that is not a recipe for a fucking disaster. Let's spit means of production among countless people who neither know how to menage them nor really care.

>>135978286
employee owned does not mean employee operated

>>135977850
I'd post a pic but I don't want to get banned for violating GR-15.

>>135977616
The best economic system by far: traditional, Catholic, agrarian, dignified, minimal government, disciplined, etc.

>>135978634
so the employees collectively pay a manager?
Isn't that just a publicly traded corporation minus the stock?

>>135979731
>agrarian
X century pls go.

File: planksmanifesto.jpg (83KB, 590x720px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 590x720px

>>135977616
>Capitalism is for the rich
>Socialism is for bureaucrats

NO YOU FUCKING DUMB MOTHERFUCKER.

I have my bank account - you have yours. They are seperate - not collective. THATS "CAPITALISM".

"Bureaucrats" are all on the public payroll leeching off it by way of provoking the state to create new currency to pay them wich affects all currency in circulation. THATS "SOCIALISM".

Our currency supplies are COLLECTIVE but we as individuals have our own currency amounts. Its the complete opposite of your little gay pic there.

Our nations are socialist - but not National. They are international. Each nation is extended credit (which is debt) by the IMF and/or world bank. We are international-socialists. Thats the end game of the new world order.

This is the new world order.

We are there.