liberal hypocrites amirite. they just don't stick to anything

>>135932449
>probably two completely different writers
Good job OP.

>>135932449
I don't know what the federalist is.

>>135932449

The Federalist is a conservative site. Which is funny in itself since a federalist is the opposite of what the republican party values

>>135932663
>b-b-b-b-but different authors
Not an argument

>>135933000
*woosh*

>>135933100
>these two completely different people have two completely different articles with two completely different opinions

woah jeez that's really making me think thoughts

horseshoe theory lives on

>>135932449
Lmao like the leaf said probably different writers. The Federalist is not left wing, they're centrist fags/right leaning as they are proponents of the Federalist party - like the name suggests.

Ever heard of two sides to a story?

File: #1.png (146KB, 199x427px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 199x427px

>>135932449

>somebody writes an opinion piece about person
>said person gets fired
>somebody else writes a new opinion piece about potential silver linings to the situation

This is normal in journalism, OP. What is abnormal is when either

a) The same author writes two hypocritical pieces in a short time-frame with no self-awareness of their hypocrisy

b) A magazine makes an asinine and misleading headline only to """retract"""" it or """correct""" it at a later time.

>>135932449
I don't even understand the whole Scaramucci thing. Some Goldman Sachs dropout gets a job as Communications Director (because I guess bankers are qualified to do that), goes on a temper tantrum on the news and then quits after two weeks. What was even the point?

>>135933799
he got reince fired, who was replaced with a military chief of staff
that was all scaramucci's destiny ever was