What´s /pol/´s take on the Incas, Mayans, and Aztec civilizations?
they were good boys and dindu nuffin
Read the book 1491. For being backwards savages by Europeon standards, they actually did some impressive shit. The Inca's would conquer an area, ship off every male, then repopulate the area with enslaved males from other regions, who would inevitably rape the local females. Worked very well for them. The Aztec's were in the beginnings of their own cultural revolution involving poetry and art, right around the time they were decimated by Europeon microbes. The Maya built beautiful structures and had an interesting pantheon.
Just trying to dilute the ocean of replies to follow which will all read some variation of "dumb Mexicans, fuck you brown monkeys". Just a bit sad to think that a second genesis of civilization, outside of Summaria, had a chance to do new things. Too bad about the measles, influenza and other illnesses born from domesticating animals.
>>135931197
Civilization doesn't wait for no one. They had a chance, but other people was more fast.
>>135929423
>Incas
A good and decent civilization that was mistreated by the Spanish.
>Maya
Uncivilized masochists.
>Aztec
Uncivilized sadists. Spanish did nothing wrong in destroying them.
>>135931702
>Mayans
>Uncivilized
Sweetie... Just no.. (-_-')
>>135929423
they did pretty well having in mind the isolation they had from the rest of the civilised world
too bad they got the label of jewish stigmatisation syndrome POOR AMERINDIANS KILLED BY THE EVIL WHITE GALLEGO