Sweden Bans Mandatory Vaccinations Over ‘Serious Health Concerns’

File: 1496179710123.gif (287KB, 482x286px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 482x286px

>>135912668
>healthnutnews

>>135912885
this
In all honesty though the actual (((news))) never reports on anything remotely against the narratives they are told to report on. ill see if i can find any other sources

update:

"Well kinda of false, the government did not impose a forced vaccination (so you HAVE to vaccinate your child or you got fines etc) but that motion seemed to been a lot bigger than just about vaccinations so political agendas... And the reason why government said no was that "there's a lot of work in the points of the motion going on" (whatever that means)
And whilst there's no mandatory vaccination program almost everyone gets vaccinated according to the national program...
Here's some info about the Swedish vaccination program from The Swedish health authority and some statistic on vaccinated children (in Swedish, but it's the percentage to the right that's important, 97% vaccinated for the common stuff like tetanus and whooping cough.)"

found a translated article
https://translate.google.com/translate?depth=1&nv=1&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=http://www.thenhf.se/riksdagen-rostade-nej-till-alla-vaccinmotioner/

OP get fucked

Today, the Riksdag decided on the Social Committee's report 2016/17: SoU7, which contained a number of measures for public health. What prompted a large proportion of the population to monitor this particular case was that it contained several motions that would pave the way for both more vaccinations and forced vaccination. This was something that involved many, not just those who have opted for vaccine but also people who are vaccinated but who absolutely do not want to see any compulsion.

NHF Sweden sent a letter to the Social Committee , declaring that it would violate our grounds if forced vaccination, or mandatory vaccination as stated in Arkelsten's exercise. Many others have also sent in letters and many have called Social Affairs and Parliamentary Policy. Riksdag politicians have certainly noticed that there is a massive resistance to all forms of coercion in terms of vaccination.

The Social Affairs Committee prepared the questions on March 23 and arrived at its proposal on April 28, and the committee's proposal was that the parliament should reject the motions. Here you can access the Social Committee report: Report 2016/17: SoU7 (pdf, 812 kB)

vaccination motions

>Compulsory childhood vaccination program In motion 2015/16: 430 by Sofia Arkelsten (M), a notice is requested that the general vaccination program be compulsory. A similar announcement is requested in motion 2016/17: 304 by Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M).

>In motion 2015/16: 563 by Hillevi Larsson (S), a notice is requested to consider in the future offering all children in Sweden the same vaccination protection.

>In committee motion 2015/16: 958 by Karin Rågsjö et al. (V) in claim 3, a notice is requested that the government should provide an appropriate authority to design an information campaign on the benefits and necessity of the childhood vaccination program.

>In claim 4, a notice is requested that the government should investigate how the childhood vaccination program can be secured across the country.

>In motion 2016/17: 320 by Ann-Britt Åsebol (M), a notice is requested to review the possibility of introducing influenza vaccination against influenza and pneumococcal infection as a national special vaccination program for all over 65 years.

>In committee motion 2016/17: 3222 by Cecilia Widegren et al. (M) claim 23, a notice is requested on the importance of continuously evaluating and reviewing vaccination programs.
In motion 2015/16: 472 by Åsa Westlund and others. (S) is requested to announce that it will allow more people to vaccinate TBE.

>In motion 2015/16: 1459 by Erik Bengtzboe (M), a notice is requested to review the possibility of offering HPV vaccine to young men on the same terms as young women in the context of high-cost protection. Similar announcements are requested in motion

>2015/16: 1499 by Désirée Pethrus (KD), exercise 2016/17: 319 by Annicka Engblom (M), exercise 2016/17: 645 by Birgitta Ohlsson and Maria Weimer (both L), exercise 2016 / 17: 2698 by Jonas Gunnarsson (S) and committee motion 2016/17: 3000 by Barbro Westerholm and others. (L) claim 11.

those were the motions and they were all voted no.

>>135914478
well you really expanded on this one, thx very much fellow anon

Slavery for consumerism

>>135917619
best slaves are slaves that think they are free- persian model and the current model we are living in:)