Why doesn't Twitter ban them?

>>135909807
It'd cause too much outrage, you fucking idiot

>>135909900
Doubt it.

WHY DOESNT 4CHAN BAN YOU?

drives traffic

>>135909942
That's because you live in blind ignorance.
If CNN said it'd cause outrage, you'd suck that shit up instantly

>>135909900
Kinda agree. It's a lot easier to smear Trump with lies, but an organization that just leaks data? I think the powers that be know that there are too many people that are awake for them to get away with that.

At the same time, some former intelligence professionals have said that WikiLeaks does, in some ways, behave like an intelligence "op" or front, but as long as they are giving us legit info, there's no reason to rail against them.

>>135909807
Not a threat to the ZOG because the sheeple don't even care anymore.

>>135910237
Doubt that, too.
For the record I support Wikileaks. I just don't think people care about its Twitter platform.

>>135910520
isn't the Twitter just Assange?

>>135909807

Because they'd leak the internal files they are probably sitting on in case such a thing happens.

>>135910791
He advertises there from time to time.

>>135911084
He's also a master troll.

>>135911560
I'm okay with that.

i dont know why. wikileaks is a terrorist organization. i hope youtube/adl bans all videos that mention them