What went wrong?
>>135891318
they got paid and didn't give a fuck, they probably got some summer houses, nice juicy bonus in the bank account or a big charity donation from a wealthy source
John McCain
Fewer laws = less govt. this a huge victory.
>>135891318
>>135891673
retard alert class
>>135891318
John McBraincancer
>>135892095
Baner was more competent than Ryan. They didnt like him because he was one of the last defenders of tobacco which the Jews hate.
>>135893511
Why is tobacco a good thing?
>>135895076
People can make whatever choices they can. They shouldn't be subject to excessive taxation and demonization by the government.
Look at that pic related. The risks of tobacco are overblown first of all and it does confer beneficial effects. It enhances cognition which is why they hate it so much. We cant have a smart population, can we!
>>135895641
But doesn't the shitty smell of tobacco affect other people? Or addiction which can affect friends and family? Second hand smoke? The time and cost of doctors that have to deal with any potential consequences of smokers? And there's dozens more studies that prove tobacco is carcinogenic.
Sounds like you might be one of those tobacco company shills.
>>135897224
>But doesn't the shitty smell of tobacco affect other people?
They are free to avoid it; most smoking is done outside nowadays so it really isn't an issue.
>Or addiction which can affect friends and family?
Usually if someone is consuming tobacco that much, they are trying to self-medicate for some other underlying health issue.
>Second hand smoke?
Largely a sham science. I feel it is not good to light up around very young children but that aside,second hand smoke is virtually harmless.
>The time and cost of doctors that have to deal with any potential consequences of smokers?
The attributions of these so called health detriments of smoking arise strictly from epidemiological associations. Smoking does not really cause significant health problems with the exception of COPD, which will only occur with filtered cigarettes.
>And there's dozens more studies that prove tobacco is carcinogenic.
There are dozens of studies showing individual components in tobacco in greatly larger concentrations are carcinogenic.
There has yet to be a single experimental study where tobacco smoke itself induced cancer. Even a recent study from the 2000s failed to induce cancer.
Fuck. I feel completely BTFO by that picture. Too bad I'm not a basic bitch normie and know the inside baseball of the whole deep state bullshit
>>135900037
1998 but still
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9608635
Redpill me quickly on tobacco. I'm a smoker and will continue to smoke no matter what but I feel like even tho it is harmful (any smoke of that volume going in and out of your lungs will be) the Jews have blown it out of proportion.
>>135891318
They fought the law and the law won.