Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
Anonymous
Women are Poorly Suited to Modern Society 2017-08-02 11:49:07 Post No. 135876436
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Women are Poorly Suited to Modern Society 2017-08-02 11:49:07 Post No. 135876436
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1409559327540.jpg (128KB, 724x390px) Image search:
[Google]
128KB, 724x390px
For every man that reproduced historically, at least 1 woman has reproduced. Going back further throughout history, it has been much worse. 8,000 years ago, 17 women reproduced for every 1 man.
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
The Y chromosome is "degenerate", which is to say that it has rapidly shrunk in humans, shedding the vast majority of its chromosomes to leave only a small number behind. This means that human males have undergone radical genetic changes throughout the evolution of our species.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1692900/
Despite gains in women's freedoms, financial success, self-determination, independence, and control over their own lives, women are more miserable now than they've ever been since we started recording their subjective well-being. Women are, by and large, quite miserable by historical standards. This is not just a factor of social problems across all of society(which have lowered happiness across all groups), but also in relation to men, who have experienced much lower effects.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w14969
Women who are conservative are significantly happier than women who are liberal. Liberal women are more often in egalitarian relationships, and more likely to focus on their careers. Conservative women tend to focus on family, raising children, and tend to be more likely to take on a relatively submissive role in the family.
http://nypost.com/2013/12/27/conservative-women-hold-secret-to-happiness/
>>
File: 1407539543880.jpg (112KB, 755x552px) Image search:
[Google]
112KB, 755x552px
>>135876436
As far as I'm aware, no one seems to want to make the connection between these data points. The degeneracy of the Y chromosome is *directly* linked to the degree to which female reproductive success outclasses male reproductive success. The addition of new chromosomes and variations is a slow process, occurring due to random chance. Most variations are detrimental, and disappear as quickly as they appeared. However, rapidly changing circumstances can cause a sudden narrowing of genetic variation in a species. This most often comes from cataclysmic changes or ecological disasters, but can also happen due to conflict with another species, or exposure to a disease or famine.
Everything about the sexual histories of men and women paints a picture wherein men were under *extreme* selective pressure throughout recent history. The VAST majority of men were unfit for reproduction, and were removed from the gene pool. The Y chromosome rapidly degenerated because of this intense selective pressure, resulting in the small and highly focused Y chromosome of today.
Moreso than any event in our biological history, the advances in technology, social progress, and larger governments and institutions have resulted in extreme environmental shifts, to which our base instincts are incredibly poorly suited. Even now, rising mental illness and depression are merely symptoms of a species thrust into a situation it had not evolved for.
And this comes to the crux of our issue. Even in the last few hundred years, men have remained under extreme selective pressure. The genes unfit for a modern society have been rapidly removed, and the fluctuations have focused men towards the needs of the present. Men are not perfectly adapted. None of us are. But the intense selective pressures mean that the Y chromosome is subject to more rapid changes and adaptations.
>>
File: 1407051977818.jpg (717KB, 1404x1722px) Image search:
[Google]
717KB, 1404x1722px
>>135876436
>>135876473
Meanwhile, the X chromosome changes much more slowly, as a women is always useful for her reproductive capabilities without actually needing to produce anything of value, or even be adapted to her current situation.
Everything in our society shows this. Give women equality and freedom, and they become miserable. Offer them independence, and they become lonely. Give them a career, and they become despondent and seek fleeting pleasures to give their life meaning.
Women evolve significantly slower than men. In time, we'll all adapt to society, but for right now the data shows that women are unfit for the progress that they have achieved. In truth, the reason we had such incredible scientific advancement in the last thousand years has been because of the repression of sexuality, both male AND female. Female sexuality is focused on acquiring the strongest male, even if it destroys group cohesion. This hyperfocus on the top ultimately leads to women drifting alone,(despite being surrounded by suitable males) acting contrary to their own interests, and failing to self-actualize in any meaningful sense.
Until our society can stop placing value upon a women's mere existence, and begin to hold men and women to the same standards, the selection gap and delayed evolution will persist. Our species is not fit for what we have created, and our failure to recognize this will ultimately destroy any progress we have made.
>>
>>135876519
>both is good in its own way
Post-modernist degenerate scum!
>>
>>135877356
Wrong pic kek
>>
>>135877356
Hardly. We'd be better off reverting, but if they want to push for equality they won't succeed unless they close the selection pressure gap.
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4