So, American politics, as I'm understanding now:
>Obama gets elected
>majority everywhere
>he brings more socialist acts, like that 800 billion bill at the start, and Obamacare
>Republicans oppose
>Teaparty happens
>lose majority in 2010
>discussion turns into shouting battles and nothing gets done
>2012 election
>Teaparty gets worse
>Teaparty are criticizing Republicans for not being effective enough, meanwhile the teaparty itself gets even more radical
>government shutdown for 16 days
>more partitioning, no discussion, nothing gets done,
>most ineffective government ever, least amount of new laws
>meanwhile other problems, like illegals and terrorist
>media gets radical too, huffington post/fox news/msnbc/hell even /pol/
>no "central" people
>radical right and left gets bigger
>Trump gets elected, as he is an "outsider", who convinces people that he can make deals in the Parlament
>full majority eveywhere
>still nothing gets done
>left is radical, they won't make deals with Trump because "he is Hitler"
>rigth won't make deals with Trump because the Teaparty leftovers and more traditional conservatives don't like him
>Obamacare not repealled
>2018 is closer and closer
So did I get everything right?
>>135868793
No, you've got it all wrong.
Let me give you a better summary.
>ultra high IQ city people elect Bill Clinton
>he brings upon a new golden age of high technological innovation and economic prosperity and philosophical enlightenment
>rural and suburban retards vote for Bush
>Bush fucks everything up
>rural and suburban retards vote for Obama instead of Hillary
>Obama fucks everything up even more
>rural and suburban retards vote for Trump
>Trump shits all over America
That's it.
>>135868991
Well I tried to be objective, but is the rural vs city people thing is so big? I mean, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pensylvania, even New Hempshire was right leaning - these are not the deep South.