Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
Environment under communism and capitalism 2017-08-02 08:31:19 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Environment under communism and capitalism 2017-08-02 08:31:19 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Ria_de_Bilbao_con_basura.jpg (272KB, 1280x960px) Image search:
[Google]
272KB, 1280x960px
Which system is better when it comes to protecting the environment (soil, water, air, plants and animals): capitalism or communism?
In capitalism, private property would be an inviolable right of every person and polluting one's property would lower its value, and polluting someone else's property would be violation of the NAP.
In communism, where the notion of private property is abolished, people would see the public property as a common good of all people, and as a result they wouldn't try to harm others, as it would harm them.
>>
>>135865003
In both situations, the population would increase as arrogant faggots continue traipsing about in their sjw shithole, spewing ineffective shit to try and fix the environment they heard on some milquetoast opinion news show.
>>
>>135865003
>>135865192
Communism because everyone is fucking dead
>>
File: BasedMook.png (165KB, 1324x422px) Image search:
[Google]
165KB, 1324x422px
>>135865395
But don't you see? That was the old communism, the dreary communism. This new communism, where workers own the means to production, will allow our world to flourish, because currency will be abolished, and people will just get whatever they desire. How dare you insinuate that communism has ever been tried? To the gulag with you.
>>
In California they have made it so inconvenient and expensive to drop off trash that people just leave it in the freeway.
Mattress in lane!
>>
>>135865003
In Communism, public property means everyone owns it in theory. In practice the GOVERNMENT owns it.
And government officials can be brought and lobbied to allow business to pollute.
China is prime example.
>>
>>135866570
>the year is 2019
>it is now cheaper to be caught littering than it is to throw trash away legitimately
>>
>>135865395
This
>>
>>135866710
What about anarcho-communism? Seems like it works only in theory, though... because it's communism.
>>
>>135865003
Sage option field for slide threads. /pol/ is a NatSco board (Christian and Pagan).
The Third position is the best position.
>>
>>135866884
There's no such thing as anarcho anything. Anarchy automatically erases whatever follows it.
Communism can only happen with a centralized state planning and enforcing wealth redistribution.
Without enforced redistribution, it'll just be free-market Capitalism.
And without a centralized State, you get decentralized local warlords.
Walking Dead is what Anarchy looks like. Instead of Stalin you'll get Negan.
>>
>>135867246
Third position, lol
NatSoc is a type of socialism (hell, the word socialism is in the name)
Only thing that makes it stand out among the haystack is that it takes race/culture into account. Mono Ethical instead of Multi Cultural.
>>
The problem with communism is the flaws of human nature. Marx and Lennin were nieve and believed that overall humans are good.
Whereas the truth is if they saw all land as communal and no their own they wouldn't give two shits about it. "Not mine, I don'y care/Not my problem"
>>
>>135865003
Communism, because not much is ever get done.
>>
>>135872711
*gotten done
Thread posts: 15
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2