Holy shit pol

The (((organization)))

>>135863733
>Jewgle is a CIA operation now
no shit

>>135863733

Look at the kind of stuff youtube puts on their official twitter account, just by the by... Utter degeneration.

http://twitter.com/youtube

>>135863733
and you're surprised? they've been that way for a good few years now. its just now the deepstate is going in full force corporate wise because they are losing politically.

>>135863877
>>135863733
also checked. Kek approves.

File: fuckme.png (60KB, 591x419px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 591x419px

>>135864213
>it can't be that bad
literally first tweet

So we radicalize harder

>>135863733
I'm reading the turners diary and I'm actually shocked to see that in 1971 they would predict all things that are happening now. They were right more than 40 years ago.

jewtube was shit anyway

>>135864365
im scared daddy

>>135864363
Going to be a problem if Jewtube is redirecting normies towards leftist propoganda videos whenever people search on (((who))) owns the media and the like.

>>135864365
This shit happened in Weimar Germany. History repeats itself.

File: IMG_4074.jpg (274KB, 672x1126px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 672x1126px

YouTube is disgusting
It allows filth like pic related, but bans videos talking about wrong think politics.

>>135864499
You see this black man? Doesnt his cock look big? Dont you want to have mixed babies? oh yes you do young white girl, yes you do.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ8RIAHx5TI

>>135863733
Youtube is a privately owned company by ABC Inc. It can do whatever it wants.

Fuck off with your commie shit! If you don't like it then use other sites.

File: j (2).jpg (70KB, 548x548px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 548x548px

>>135863733
>NGOs
>blue checkmarks
>grandiose self-awarded titles

youtube isn't a public space, what is the problem here? if they don't want hate speech on their website, it's well within their rights to delete it.

upload your shit to liveleak or whatever, there are other alternatives to youtube, and stop fucking whining.

>>135864527
That's very interesting, definitely will show my kids.

>>135864946
Social media is the new public square, and the companies that own them are communication utilities like telephone companies. Utilities are not allowed to discriminate based on politics.

If republicans and Trump weren't useless retards it'd be pretty high on their priority list. It's nowhere on their list.

File: 1485763378957.jpg (64KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 500x376px

>>135864521
>Weimar Germany.

Does that mean the Fourth Reich is coming soon then?

>>135863733
>Shooting themselves in the foot allowing for other business to fill that gap to provide services that have free speech

I see no problem with this
We need something else besides youtube

File: 1499236596369.jpg (16KB, 320x520px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 320x520px

>>135864946
>Site which has been receiving negagive criticism for not listening to it's userbase, warping the recommend videos, sucking content creators dry is now enforcing even more alienating draconian level censorship

>it's their business! Somehow freedom of speech and action invalidates any negative criticism to a service which is growing awful

>>135864946
Meanwhile, in reality, this is still being used to brainwash millions of people as they just openly fucking admitted in the article. "Muh private internet property stop complaining" what a shit argument.

>>135864814
Indeed
Feed the beast, watch it grow
Only way to deal with monopolies
Is to stop using them

>>135863733
Recently haven't you guys seen those threads asking about what's the best alt right music on YouTube going up around here?

And then all the content linked by anons disappeared.

Now you know why.

During the later part of the election, at least on my devices, and YT search for DNC-sensitive subjects such as "Seth Rich" returned playlists for porn, often with full nudity on the preview images.

Sounds related.

>>135864814
>>135864946
>(((the free market)))

kikes are shameless

>>135864527
That's a psy-op meant to generate positive sentiment towards censorship. It won't actually be canned until it begins somehow generating negative sentiment towards censorship. Try playing with the memes and you'll see what I mean. It's meant to force people into a satanic choice: either they can support something degenerate as artistic freedom, or they can acquiesce to actual freedoms being snuffed first in exchange for that trash being pulled eventually.

Except there's actually no incentive to snuff freedoms, since giving in won't stop the parts of the program that generate propaganda value. That means there's no good option here but to embrace chaos, hail Eris, and make it spread in the name of freedom. That will kill it FAST. It isn't supposed to generate freedom sentiment at all.

>>135863733

luckily, tesla was wrong here. which is also unfortunate for them.

>>135863733
Time to upload videos on minds.com

File: abs01.jpg (91KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 400x400px

>>135864213
>>135864347

jesus christ

it's so bad

>>135863733
I'm saving all of my YouTube playlists offline. My channel is getting deleted soon.

File: 1499923596773.jpg (16KB, 208x236px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 208x236px

>>135863733

The ADL is involved.

Just fucking great.

>>135864213
>http://twitter.com/youtube

It is depressing that the public has to rely on a service that pushes such an obvious agenda.

9 out of 10 of their featured videos are cancer and the remaining 1 is garbage.

File: 1485227126571.jpg (12KB, 555x505px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 555x505px

>>135865476

>>135867525
How do you do that?

>>135867703
Dunno. I'm saving everything of value individually like a pleb.

Hmmm... i wonder who... hmmm?????

>>135865132
"refugee camps"

>>135867703
You can download programs that rip youtube videos in various formats.

File: 1499937977080.png (221KB, 374x376px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 374x376px

There were a bunch of stories in the media about 3 years ago saying that youtube was Google's loss leader. They stated that the enormous amount of server space needed, as well as the power requirements, far exceeded the profit yourtube was making. This was way before the elections. If anything, I would say start thinking about alternative forms of dissemination NOW. Even if (((they))) were not interested in clamping down on free speech, the sheer size of youtube and the resources required to make it work make the site to huge of a liability. If I remember correctly, they were even talking about making it a nonprofit to shield themselves from the financial liability.

>>135868471
This is what's worrying about a potential alternative- if Google is willing to operate Youtube at a loss, it can effectively snuff out any attempt at a competitor replacing it by undercutting them at every turn.

>>135868690
That's why the competitor will have to be either nonprofit or work in some sort of public capacity. Public servers protected by the first amendment. It's not too much of a stretch these days, and can't be that hard to implement.

Or some other way. . . but yeah, they are going to clamp down the moment they feel even the slightest financial strain. Perhaps that moment is now?

>>135867703
>>135867525

youtube-dl if you're comfortable with the command line
youtube-dlg is the same but has a GUI
lets you download playlists

>>135868690
That's anticompetitive and monopolistic. They would lose any lawsuit, and may even be forced to fund the competitor.

Could you imagine it? A right wing racist nazi version of YouTube that Google has to pay for because they were being monopolists? Is 2017 still the best timeline?

>>135864946
>>135865112

While it's true that they're completely within their rights as a private organization, there's something to be said about the social responsibility of maintaining neutrality if you're a monolithic service provider operating in a market with such a substantial barrier to entry.

Regardless of the outcome I feel a public dialogue on this issue needs to happen. Society as a whole should set precedents like this moving forward instead of unthinkingly slipping into the policies of small number of influential elites, whomever they may truly be.

I'm hoping this sort of censorship leads to more websites popping up and splitting userbases, these types of hosts honestly don't deserve a dime at this rate and if freedom to view/express or even learn counter opinions history is "extremist" just shoot me already.
Though it would seem that with the left rapidly becoming more authoritarian and controlling, atleast its eye opening to the average lot, typically when society becomes so laden with propaganda it creates a very strong opposition as it did in a lot of commie bloc's.

Nows the time to start up alternatives for shekels FYI.

File: alex_jones.jpg (53KB, 800x480px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 800x480px

>>135863733
The answer to 1984 is 1488

File: based richard spencer.png (197KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 700x700px

>>135863733
I don't post on the fourchannels often. But this bread needs a bump.

Google has now transitioned from its covert censorship model to an overt one. SJWs always double-down indeed. This is only going to end badly.

Are there any alternative video hosting platforms that have the capacity to help /ourguys/ keep getting their message out?

>>135866456
We don't support censorship fool, we want the people who are making this shit to stop abusing children.

File: refugees-stage-protest-on-nauru-data.jpg (535KB, 2992x2000px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 2992x2000px

>>135868206
>australia
>austria
um, hans?

>>135869048
Perhaps we can get the Trump admin to """advise""" YT that if they wish to retain their loss-leading monopoly they will have to give every voice equal footing. YT is all about equality, no?

>>135873800

>Are there any alternative video hosting platforms that have the capacity to help /ourguys/ keep getting their message out?

LBRY

>>135874480
Current events seem to show conclusively the answer is no.

File: interesting choice of picture wikipedia.png (55KB, 834x488px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 834x488px

>>135874607
The sixty second intro video to LBRY shows several of /ourguys/, including the notorious Mr Hyde. Looks promising.

How about opening thousands of sock accounts and putting up saved videos that youtube finds most offensive (merchant minute?). Basically shill the shit out of youtube.