Political alignment chart acceptable/unacceptable meme thread

File: blankchart.jpg (77KB, 958x871px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 958x871px

>>135858956
Template.

File: compass.png (9KB, 383x350px)

9KB, 383x350px

>>135858956

No way am I filling in 400 squares

File: 1499387996008m.jpg (65KB, 951x1024px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 951x1024px

>>135859372
I got you, senpai.

File: Compass 2017.png (32KB, 843x771px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 843x771px

Rate desu

File: 143412245124152.png (8KB, 214x236px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 214x236px

>>135859557
It's this

File: d03c9e07915da48f9e70096408f170160e981c8ab117aaa522a167ec1538a893.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>135859969
That one isn't on my phone.

Do you ever feels silly that you discovered your political ideology from memes?

Me either.

File: youdoodle-2017-08-02T02-16-29Z.jpg (453KB, 958x871px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 958x871px

>>135858956

File: pol compass NatSoc2.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

EIN VOLK

>>135860232
>good ideas don't require roads
ftfy

>>135858956
>>135859086
fucking commie leaves

>>135860495

>2015
>Americans still don't know how to properly treat their workers

File: burnthemout.jpg (180KB, 958x871px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 958x871px

1 million hours in gimp2 and also a shitty paint bucket

File: psaac.jpg (36KB, 872x960px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 872x960px

>>135859969
>thumbnail
both of you are retards

File: 1491768149815.png (6KB, 420x366px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 420x366px

As a last resort, Pinochet can save us from leftist menace and socialist scum.

File: F04.png (752KB, 4724x2699px) Image search: [Google]

752KB, 4724x2699px

>>135860707
>nazis acceptable
we don't accept you

File: remove-socialism.png (98KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 960x960px

>>135858956

>>135860726
Buffalo Gap Texas?

File: image.jpg (41KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x400px

>>135858956

>>135860905
Inadvertently so.

>>135860851
>I tread where I please
Sure you do, buddyo, your government doesn't have a say in where you're treading at all. It's not like you'd give up your rights for the good of muh race.

>>135860956
Basically anything to the right of the center line is a-ok, anything left is degenerate commie/neo-socialist liberals

File: Libertarian Problems.png (1MB, 1262x2094px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1262x2094px

>>135861059
>It's not like you'd give up your rights for the good of muh race.
It's not like you'd defend them.

>>135861059
In their fantasy they are the fuhrer and others have to follow their orders.

Ironically they would be the first one to get gassed. :)

>>135861241
>In their fantasy they are the fuhrer and others have to follow their orders.
No, see, unlike you Libertarians and AnCaps, we can all agree on stuff. You guys can't even agree what's covered under the NAP or how you'd defend yourself when outnumbered.

File: 1499632575501.jpg (25KB, 540x454px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 540x454px

>>135861838
With MY bullets and guns?

With MY loved ones?

You act like the collective has answers that aren't "Be ants! For the hill!"

>>135862144
>With MY bullets and guns?
Against an army? Good luck.

>>135861838
Who ever said we need to agree, the whole point of polycentric law is to have separate but harmonious legal systems for people's different dispositions.

And yes, there is good theory as to what ancap communities would do in defense. For example, rights enforcement agencies would focus more on assassinations of leaders and corresponding r&d.

>>135862144
I hope ancapistan happens that way Genghis Khan 2.0 can bring his army to your house and rape your entire bloodline.

File: 1488918754994.jpg (7KB, 262x192px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 262x192px

>>135862233
Rights enforcement agencies which insure areas adjacent to states which could possibly pose a threat are likely to maintain their own standing armies, and yes people will pay for that service.

>>135862593
>maintain their own standing armies
Why are there so many mercenaries? Where are they all coming from?
>and yes people will pay for that service.
How much? Also, you have to take into account they probably won't fight odds that are too unfavorable. You have to train and equip the men after all.
>>135862415
>rights enforcement agencies would focus more on assassinations of leaders and corresponding r&d.
Sounds like these "rights enforcement agencies" would be used quite a lot to kill heads of rival companies and to bully smaller ones.