Does LBRY have what it takes to replace YouTube after the recent round of political censorship?
>LBRY in 100 Seconds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjouYBEkQPY
I just want something to take out YouTube/Google.
>>135851511
ironically on youtube.
>>135851511
Completely decentralised, anonymous video sharing
What could possibly go wrong
>>135852767
Pretty much this
Any video sharing platform without moderation will turn into porn.
>>135851150
just downloaded it its really buggy but it has potential.
>>135851511
is this eth token? if it is thats just plain retarded.
>>135853058
yeah, it's currently in development. the last commit was about 2 days ago. how's it work. I don't have free space to try it out on this exact PC just yet.
>>135851150
lbry://virtuesignalnation#b41deac24c4509d1849651386b223b9b33610d53
I posted a vid talking shit about Canada. LBRY has real potential, could give us the edge we need. I'd re-upload the murdoch-murdoch episodes there, but I don't want to steal it from them.
>>135851150
Doesn't have ads, hosts copyrighted content (will inevitably lead to legal issues in the future that will be far worse than the ones YouTube faced during the infancy. The only solution they offered so far is to delist them from search forms), the idea of an application rather than a webpage is too convoluted to ever get off the ground, the interface isn't as sleek as YouTube/Facebook/tumblr etc.
Looks like shit. It's minds.com but in app form with a gimmick. They'll ultimately be responsible for offering a medium for people to host pirated content and their gimmick will disappear.
>lbry
>LBRY
It's going to die a million deaths via it's name alone.
>>135851150
no
see:
https://zeronet.io/
https://ipfs.io/
these are p2p decentralized as well, only a small amount of users use it.
and even it being 'decentralized' like >>135852767
it's not secure enough to start hosting cp as you still know who you're downloading from, unless it's tor integrated.
it's a step in the right direction, though. but won't be mainstream for a long time, even then it won't take over WWW
>>135858062
ok so i guess the question for this post is:
can a chan be hosted and function on either of the 2 platforms you mentioned? because IIFC the chan software is free and I could host my own in my bedroom NOW excpet it's limited by bandwith. so instead of getting a cloud account and paying for someone else's computer to host "mychan" can i utilize either of these and migrate/treat them like a personal server? of is it just for static type html pages?