The Seth Rich investigatro lawsuit doesn't make sense

>>135806605

but he appeared on hannity's show a long time ago with the story..

>>135806829
It doesn't make sense. Either he was lying then, or he's lying now. If he was part of some great conspiracy to make a fake news story, why is he coming out now?

>>135806605
no sense

just

>>135806605
Trump did it to implicate perfectly innocent Hillary. The courts will prove as much.

IMPEACH NAO!

Justice is coming

Someone has dirt on him. He's definitely getting blackmailed or threatened to bury this

Don't let it die, this means they're hiding something

>>135807168

he actually changed his story after the first interview with the local DC fox affiliate, then went on Hannity to "clarify" what he meant, then not 24 hours later he was singing a different tune. Then he was interviewed by George Webb a week later and suggested his original comments were correct.

at some point fox put out an article on it and then the DNC lawyers got involved. I'm unsure of the exact time frame of all of this, but it seems like Wheeler's comments to people actually interviewing him have been somewhat consistent. whereas the "official" statements by him and his attorney and the Rich family's DNC fixer are what is contradicting those earlier statements.

Now we have a grand conspiracy alleged in a civil lawsuit. Which if you read the document it's almost entirely fabricated nonsense.