>Half of university students in Australia had been sexually

i promise you that none of those """women""" were sexually assaulted

File: 1494034056008.jpg (70KB, 870x960px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 870x960px

>>135768372

>three hideous "women" share their rape fantasies with the world in a brave display of femininity

Why is my government full of these filthy commie rat retards?

File: 1407680797787.jpg (701KB, 1151x2134px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 1151x2134px

>>135768372
Women were a mistake.

>>135768372
>harassed
They probably just got cat called or maybe someone they weren't attracted to tried to hit on them.
They are real victims

>>135768691

>they weren't attracted to someone who tried to hit on them

Mate, more like they tried to hit on someone who wasn't attracted to them. Now they've been rejection-raped.

Cunts shouldn't be in schools anyway.
>>135768372
Why are they using AT&T's logo?

source:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/31/world/australia/shocking-levels-of-sexual-violence-found-on-australian-campuses-report-says.html

So giving girls compliments for their looks is considered harassment now? Or are they trying to say men randomly told them how they want to ravage their vaginas? And if it's considered somewhere in between the two, how am I supposed to measure that? Am I better off not talking to girls? But if I do that, they'll call me a beta loser. If I act like their friend, I'll be called a beta loser. So how do I win?

>>135769112
Archived it
https://archive.is/9N1uX

>>135768556
They consider being triggered as rape. So, yeah, likely not.