It might be a weird topic, that is somehow still political. Some of you guys might have seen it already, but right now the guy who "shot" the picture related gets sued by Peta.
The man named David Slater has been fighting for years over who has the copyright to photos taken by monkeys using his camera, and says he’s struggling as a result.
So basicly Peta is trying to ruin a mans life, just because the fucking 6 year old Ape that is called Naruto should recive the money.
Should or even can we help this guy in this case? What is your opinion on that topic?
Would it be better if we just gas all Peta activists?
>>135748891
Also the sources:
https://www.peta.org/blog/monkey-selfie-case-animal-rights-focus/
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/23/world/monkey-selfie-peta-lawsuit/index.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3245807/PETA-sues-nature-photographer-hopes-giving-MONKEY-copyright-ownership-selfie.html
>>135748891
They just decide to fuck over a poorfag with their billion dollar lawyer team cuz virtue signal? Thats fucked
>>135748940
Please archive those
>http://edition cnn com/2015/09/23/world/monkey-selfie-peta-lawsuit/index.html
https://archive.is/fbf07
I should also mention, that he stopped taking photos and is literally at the edge of poverty. He can't even buy his little daughter a bike.
All that just because Peta wants that Ape to recive the money he could have earned from the pictures.
Sure in theory the Ape "took" that selfie, but he used his gear + the preperations that were made before. As stated in the article, he earned enough to finance his trip to indonesia.