New gay animation on YouTube, what's your thoughts on this /pol/?
>>135739592
link?
>>135739592
fgts exist, some make cgi, one decides to make gay cgi video regarding relationships, it is a total none issue for anyone who is not gay
I fail to see the reason for the collective spazzing out about it.
>>135739772
https://youtu.be/2REkk9SCRn0
>>135739592
And as a follow up thought.
>>135739843
that shit looks pretty gay even by faggot standards
>>135739592
Degenerate.
>>135739793
It matter's because all I see are a bunch of retards liking an animation just because it's gay? Imagine every movie gets a awards for having the most diversity points.
>>135739592
STOP SHILLING THIS FAGGOT SHIT ALL OVER /POL/
NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR YAOI WETDREAM YOU SICK FUCK
>>135739592
Rule 34 when
>>135739592
>another thread
Sage
>>135739592
Aside from the gay plot, which isn't even that original these days, his short has zero going for it. Seriously, why do these shorts always have the most predictable, formulaic laid-out plots? I know it's a short but really? It always starts with some comedic quirky behavior which, turns into muh lols, then suddenly said quirky behavior becomes quickly problematic and then everybody starts to go to shit on the main character. Then the character loses something important, has a sad cast down look, and then something comes over him, the problem is solved and everyone is happy again. It's literally the same plot for every generic Disney imitation short.