I need a redpill.

coming right up: your not accounting for population, nor where the wealthy that control a majority of the capital live.

Most of California's GDP are failing silicon valley companies succumbing to diversity and media that's about to be socially patronized instead of funded by billionaires with political intentions.

Similar with new York, just because lots of companies have HQs there doesn't mean they have a real economy. With that being said, if Texas went republic it'd be the greatest troll against California ever.

File: redpillpt2.png (57KB, 529x863px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 529x863px

>>135707820
I didn't post with population because it looks... worse.

>>135707492
where is this from? Oregon aint red.

File: redpillme.png (87KB, 697x962px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 697x962px

>>135708385
Tried to disprove democratic "economics". Data's from wikipedia.

>>135708214
So it's basically the California of Jesusland? Sounds dope.

File: 20170620_202008.jpg (10KB, 115x111px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 115x111px

>>135707492
Someone post the one where it breaks it up by taxpayer. Pic unrelated. Also (((Republicans)))

File: Futurama-Fry.jpg (16KB, 552x414px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 552x414px

>>135707492
>>135708940
>same image
>same dimensions
>one is a few kb smaller

>>135707492
>>135708282
>>135708940
"If you measure by consumption patterns then it's the blue states that are poor, the red states that are rich."
In other words, those blue states that have a higher GDP just have a higher concentration of modern "slave owners" i.e. the super rich and an "oppressed" underclass held back by welfare.
http://archive.is/f56z4