Why do liberals believe that if the federal government did away with the US Department of Education that all schools would magically disappear? States have been running public school systems for a much longer time than the federal government's education department has existed. Why does the federal government need to be involved in local schools?
>>135660649
Manlet here.
Just a reminder that we are taking over. The fact is women have NEVER been attracted to tall men: they needed them for protection, economic support and procreation, and sex is what they traded for those things (or the lanklets just raped them).
But now? First-world men have been totally domesticated, so no need to worry about violence. We're taking over the work force too, so we can provide for ourselves. And shoe science has made being tall totally unnecessary; we can just buy the shboes (with our superior earnings) and have it clearly appear that we are within the range of six feet.
Women are naturally more attracted to 5'5-5'8 men. Who wouldn't be? We can be buff as fuck with minimal effort in the gym, while lanklets struggle to gain muscle and are forced to shrink their balls and destroy their fertility with roidz. We're more aesthetic for film and TV work because our proportions work better on screen. And we know how to please women like no tall man ever could. Manlet sex can last for hours.
Every day more and more "heightist" girls are being turned. The world of the future is where a small number of tall men act as our designated CEOs and lightbulb changers, and the rest of you lanklet losers are eunuchs designated for homosexual fashion modelling exclusively. Deal with it.
>>135660649
Big if true