I understand that the biggest red pill of all is perhaps too

File: thanksigiving-childfree.jpg (45KB, 680x433px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 680x433px

I understand that the biggest red pill of all is perhaps too much for the intellectually challenged, but lets talk about children and why having them is bad for both the individual and society at large.

All the greatest people in history were without children, the most prolific creators and inventors were able to pursue their greatness in part because they weren't beholden to the whims of a child.
Even today, amongst scientists, authors etc etc, all those at the peak of their field are without children. To have a child is to admit defeat, to throw in the towel, it is the death of the individual and individualism. The death of careers, hobbies, self-enrichment, self-improvement. The ultimate selfish act in which the individual says "I'm not strong enough to carry on, and to fill the void I will have a child, and convince myself that doing so is somehow just as meaningful".

How about society and the species at large? Each first world child will produce about 10,000 tons of CO2 in their lifetime. Science has shown us that global warming, caused by human production of CO2, is harming the environment, we also know the pollutants we each produce leads to the early deaths of many tens of millions of people a year. Of course children must be born to continue the human race, but there are far too many people and far too many children being born.

Only the most selfless of people can shed their base instincts and opt for a childfree life. Any arguments that don't invoke the Jews, globalists, etc are welcome